Essential services in light of the 2014 Labour Law amendments
- Authors: Seshoka, Lesiba Job
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47427 , vital:39990
- Description: The topic of the treatise is “Essential Services in light of the 2014 Labour Law amendments”. It aims to investigate the state of essential services in the wake of the 2014 changes to the Labour Relations Act. As Pillay1 puts it, Furthermore, 15 years under our new essential services regime, it is time for reflection to preserve and improve what works and to fix what does not. The treatment of essential services is not playing as planned. In the meantime, notwithstanding the prohibition of strikes in essential services, they occur with disconcerting frequency, duration and intensity”. From these, one can deduce that prior to the changes effected in 2014, there have been serious challenges facing essential service personnel and employers which necessitated a change in legislation. The question, which this treatise tries to answer, is whether such change in legislation would in all likelihood addresses the challenges, which faced essential service employers and employees before it was enacted.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Seshoka, Lesiba Job
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47427 , vital:39990
- Description: The topic of the treatise is “Essential Services in light of the 2014 Labour Law amendments”. It aims to investigate the state of essential services in the wake of the 2014 changes to the Labour Relations Act. As Pillay1 puts it, Furthermore, 15 years under our new essential services regime, it is time for reflection to preserve and improve what works and to fix what does not. The treatment of essential services is not playing as planned. In the meantime, notwithstanding the prohibition of strikes in essential services, they occur with disconcerting frequency, duration and intensity”. From these, one can deduce that prior to the changes effected in 2014, there have been serious challenges facing essential service personnel and employers which necessitated a change in legislation. The question, which this treatise tries to answer, is whether such change in legislation would in all likelihood addresses the challenges, which faced essential service employers and employees before it was enacted.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Evaluating the exclusion of certain categories of workers from the coverage of the unemployment insurance act 63 of 2001 and the consequences thereof
- Authors: Ncamane, Ntando
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Social security
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/18347 , vital:42254
- Description: The South African Unemployment Insurance system esteems from Social Insurance as a stream of Social Security, which consist of various elements, such as private savings, social assistance and social relief as well as social insurance. The Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001 together with its sister Act, which is the Unemployment Insurance Contribution Act 4 of 2002 regulate South Africa’s unemployment insurance system. The Unemployment Insurance Act made provision for the establishment of the Unemployment Insurance Fund, which will pay unemployment benefits to certain categories of employees for unemployment, illness, maternity, adoption and dependents benefits. The UIA further makes provision for the establishment of the Unemployment Insurance Board and the appointment of the Unemployment Insurance Commissioner. The UIA applies to all employers and employees including domestic workers and seasonal workers, except to employees who work for less than 24 hours a month, employees who are employed on a leanership registered under the Skills Development Act 97 of 1998 and employees employed by the national or provincial government. Although the new Unemployment Insurance Amendment Bill makes provision for workers who were previously excluded from the coverage to be covered under the Amendment Act, these workers includes, workers on learnership, government workers and migrant workers. However, there are still some workers who do not enjoy the scope and application of the UIA those workers are workers working in the informal sector and employees who work less than 24 hours a month and workers who voluntary resign. Apart from the challenge of coverage, the study also examines other challenges faced by the UIA such as non-compliance with international standards, failure to minimise unemployment, discrimination of women against unemployment benefits, the short financial intervention provided by the UIF and the lack of proper dispute resolution mechanism. It is therefore the aim of this study to evaluate the exclusionary practice of the UIA and its repercussions on these certain categories of workers mentioned above. To achieve this abovementioned aim, the study embarks on a journey in which the background is outlined; the historical background of both social security and unemployment insurance including both the constitutional and legislative background (vi) is examined. The study scrutinises the unemployment insurance legal framework this include the structure of the UIF, benefits paid by the UIF, requirements for qualifying for benefits stipulated by the UIA. It goes further in scrutinising these certain categories of workers and other notable challenges of the UIA and UIF. Lastly but not least, an International Perspective and Comparative study is engaged on, so to outline relevant international instrument to the study and to get a better understanding of other countries unemployment insurance system and to enable South Africa to learn from these countries to enhance its unemployment insurance. Finally, recommendations are made to provide solutions to the UIA shortcomings identified in this study.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Ncamane, Ntando
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Social security
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/18347 , vital:42254
- Description: The South African Unemployment Insurance system esteems from Social Insurance as a stream of Social Security, which consist of various elements, such as private savings, social assistance and social relief as well as social insurance. The Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001 together with its sister Act, which is the Unemployment Insurance Contribution Act 4 of 2002 regulate South Africa’s unemployment insurance system. The Unemployment Insurance Act made provision for the establishment of the Unemployment Insurance Fund, which will pay unemployment benefits to certain categories of employees for unemployment, illness, maternity, adoption and dependents benefits. The UIA further makes provision for the establishment of the Unemployment Insurance Board and the appointment of the Unemployment Insurance Commissioner. The UIA applies to all employers and employees including domestic workers and seasonal workers, except to employees who work for less than 24 hours a month, employees who are employed on a leanership registered under the Skills Development Act 97 of 1998 and employees employed by the national or provincial government. Although the new Unemployment Insurance Amendment Bill makes provision for workers who were previously excluded from the coverage to be covered under the Amendment Act, these workers includes, workers on learnership, government workers and migrant workers. However, there are still some workers who do not enjoy the scope and application of the UIA those workers are workers working in the informal sector and employees who work less than 24 hours a month and workers who voluntary resign. Apart from the challenge of coverage, the study also examines other challenges faced by the UIA such as non-compliance with international standards, failure to minimise unemployment, discrimination of women against unemployment benefits, the short financial intervention provided by the UIF and the lack of proper dispute resolution mechanism. It is therefore the aim of this study to evaluate the exclusionary practice of the UIA and its repercussions on these certain categories of workers mentioned above. To achieve this abovementioned aim, the study embarks on a journey in which the background is outlined; the historical background of both social security and unemployment insurance including both the constitutional and legislative background (vi) is examined. The study scrutinises the unemployment insurance legal framework this include the structure of the UIF, benefits paid by the UIF, requirements for qualifying for benefits stipulated by the UIA. It goes further in scrutinising these certain categories of workers and other notable challenges of the UIA and UIF. Lastly but not least, an International Perspective and Comparative study is engaged on, so to outline relevant international instrument to the study and to get a better understanding of other countries unemployment insurance system and to enable South Africa to learn from these countries to enhance its unemployment insurance. Finally, recommendations are made to provide solutions to the UIA shortcomings identified in this study.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Labour dispute resolution in Uganda
- Chabo, Godsent, Ndimurwimo, Leah A
- Authors: Chabo, Godsent , Ndimurwimo, Leah A
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) -- Uganda , Labor disputes -- Uganda Arbitration, Industrial -- Uganda Industrial relations -- Uganda
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48960 , vital:41566
- Description: The dissertation examines the Ugandan labour dispute resolution system by undertaking an analysis of international labour standards and a case study of South Africa’s labour dispute system. The study pronounces the legislative provisions of the Employment Act and Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act that exist for the effective and efficient resolution of labour disputes through an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system. The study contends for the provision of a proactive and expeditious dispute resolution system that helps to resolve labour disputes in the most effective and efficient manner, without necessarily having to resort to the courts. The dissertation further examines the provisions of relevant international labour standards on labour dispute resolution to ascertain their adequacy as part frameworks that apply to Uganda’s obligation to provide ADR systems that respond to the needs of the labour relations community. The study contends that ratifying particular ILO conventions creates obligations upon a country to comply and apply provisions of these conventions in national legislation. It is further argued that by having ratified those international labour standards that provide for ADR, Uganda assumes specific obligations under international law, enjoining the country to provide the required ADR system of conciliation and arbitration, which is reliable and trusted by the countries citizens. A case study of South Africa is adopted with the primary focus on whether Uganda can learn from South African’s ADR system which is arguably more effective and efficient. South Africa has a labour dispute resolution system that has influenced majority of the Southern African Development Community (SADAC) law, hence prompting this study to borrow its ADR system predominantly the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). Despite the differences between Uganda and South Africa, the study also indicates fundamental similarities. Preferably, disputes should be resolved at conciliation level, resulting in the minority of disputes being referred to arbitration or the Industrial Court. This is far from the reality of the situation in Uganda. The study acknowledges that the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act and Employment Act have put up provisions to establish a fast and effective labour dispute system, however, the gap exists at implementing these effective provisions in the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act and the Employment Act. These lacunae in implementation make the attainment of an effective and efficient labour dispute resolution difficult. For this reason, the author proposes several remedial interventions in line with international labour standards and lessons from South Africa’s system that look to the future and the continued provision of fast, effective, and user-friendly ADR services. For Uganda to solve successfully apply these remedies, a strong political will as well as concerted efforts from all role players in the labour relations community is required.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Chabo, Godsent , Ndimurwimo, Leah A
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) -- Uganda , Labor disputes -- Uganda Arbitration, Industrial -- Uganda Industrial relations -- Uganda
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48960 , vital:41566
- Description: The dissertation examines the Ugandan labour dispute resolution system by undertaking an analysis of international labour standards and a case study of South Africa’s labour dispute system. The study pronounces the legislative provisions of the Employment Act and Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act that exist for the effective and efficient resolution of labour disputes through an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system. The study contends for the provision of a proactive and expeditious dispute resolution system that helps to resolve labour disputes in the most effective and efficient manner, without necessarily having to resort to the courts. The dissertation further examines the provisions of relevant international labour standards on labour dispute resolution to ascertain their adequacy as part frameworks that apply to Uganda’s obligation to provide ADR systems that respond to the needs of the labour relations community. The study contends that ratifying particular ILO conventions creates obligations upon a country to comply and apply provisions of these conventions in national legislation. It is further argued that by having ratified those international labour standards that provide for ADR, Uganda assumes specific obligations under international law, enjoining the country to provide the required ADR system of conciliation and arbitration, which is reliable and trusted by the countries citizens. A case study of South Africa is adopted with the primary focus on whether Uganda can learn from South African’s ADR system which is arguably more effective and efficient. South Africa has a labour dispute resolution system that has influenced majority of the Southern African Development Community (SADAC) law, hence prompting this study to borrow its ADR system predominantly the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). Despite the differences between Uganda and South Africa, the study also indicates fundamental similarities. Preferably, disputes should be resolved at conciliation level, resulting in the minority of disputes being referred to arbitration or the Industrial Court. This is far from the reality of the situation in Uganda. The study acknowledges that the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act and Employment Act have put up provisions to establish a fast and effective labour dispute system, however, the gap exists at implementing these effective provisions in the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act and the Employment Act. These lacunae in implementation make the attainment of an effective and efficient labour dispute resolution difficult. For this reason, the author proposes several remedial interventions in line with international labour standards and lessons from South Africa’s system that look to the future and the continued provision of fast, effective, and user-friendly ADR services. For Uganda to solve successfully apply these remedies, a strong political will as well as concerted efforts from all role players in the labour relations community is required.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Noise pollution at sea
- Authors: Karomo, Adelaide Aquiline
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Marine pollution
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48091 , vital:40470
- Description: Marine species heavily rely on sound to perform day to day functions and, since the advent of industrialisation, anthropogenic noise in the marine environment has been on the increase and is expected to increase further as countries continue to develop. The impacts of anthropogenic noise on marine species have been deeply scrutinised especially by the international community and it has been established that this humaninduced noise at sea must be reduced to conserve marine biodiversity. A background of the major contributors to anthropogenic noise is discussed, as well as the international instruments regulating them. For instance the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (hereinafter referred to as “the UNCLOS”),1 is discussed because it is the primary instrument regulating activities at sea and the protection of the marine environment and the species therein. South Africa has ratified the UNCLOS and is under a legal obligation to comply with its provisions by implementing them into domestic rules and regulations. Furthermore, the applicable global and regional instruments dealing with marine environmental protection from anthropogenic noise are weighed against the national South African legislation and this assessment serves the purpose of ascertaining the extent to which South Africa has complied with its international law obligation. The dissertation goes a step further by identifying and assessing the efforts made by foreign jurisdictions, specifically Australia, Greenland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. This determination is meant to determine whether there are lessons South Africa can learn, if any, from these jurisdictions in order to improve its current marine environmental protection legislation in fulfilment of international law. The dissertation also shows that there is need to improve the South African environmental protection legislation by taking into account some of the developments made by international organisations, such as the International Maritime Organisation (hereinafter referred to as “the IMO”) and by foreign jurisdictions. These improvements to South African legislation would comprise of adopting activity-specific regulations, such as the IMO’s guidelines on minimising noise emitted by commercial shipping vessels and the United Kingdom’s Joint Nature Conservation Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “JNCC”) guidelines on seismic surveys. The regulations adopted by the international community are especially essential to fill the gap as far as the South African regulation of noise emitted by offshore renewable energy processes and naval operations are concerned.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Karomo, Adelaide Aquiline
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Marine pollution
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48091 , vital:40470
- Description: Marine species heavily rely on sound to perform day to day functions and, since the advent of industrialisation, anthropogenic noise in the marine environment has been on the increase and is expected to increase further as countries continue to develop. The impacts of anthropogenic noise on marine species have been deeply scrutinised especially by the international community and it has been established that this humaninduced noise at sea must be reduced to conserve marine biodiversity. A background of the major contributors to anthropogenic noise is discussed, as well as the international instruments regulating them. For instance the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (hereinafter referred to as “the UNCLOS”),1 is discussed because it is the primary instrument regulating activities at sea and the protection of the marine environment and the species therein. South Africa has ratified the UNCLOS and is under a legal obligation to comply with its provisions by implementing them into domestic rules and regulations. Furthermore, the applicable global and regional instruments dealing with marine environmental protection from anthropogenic noise are weighed against the national South African legislation and this assessment serves the purpose of ascertaining the extent to which South Africa has complied with its international law obligation. The dissertation goes a step further by identifying and assessing the efforts made by foreign jurisdictions, specifically Australia, Greenland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. This determination is meant to determine whether there are lessons South Africa can learn, if any, from these jurisdictions in order to improve its current marine environmental protection legislation in fulfilment of international law. The dissertation also shows that there is need to improve the South African environmental protection legislation by taking into account some of the developments made by international organisations, such as the International Maritime Organisation (hereinafter referred to as “the IMO”) and by foreign jurisdictions. These improvements to South African legislation would comprise of adopting activity-specific regulations, such as the IMO’s guidelines on minimising noise emitted by commercial shipping vessels and the United Kingdom’s Joint Nature Conservation Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “JNCC”) guidelines on seismic surveys. The regulations adopted by the international community are especially essential to fill the gap as far as the South African regulation of noise emitted by offshore renewable energy processes and naval operations are concerned.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Non-standard employment in terms of the labour relations act
- Authors: Tatchell, Veronique
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , South Africa -- Labour Relations Act, 1995 , Flexible work arrangements -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49027 , vital:41594
- Description: Historically, employers utilised non-standard or atypical forms of employment in order to avoid statutory obligations in respect of these employees, and in turn justify differential treatment of said employees.1 As a result, non-standard employees were not on the same footing as their permanent counterparts. They were not remunerated on the same level, were not privy to advancement and training opportunities, and did not enjoy a sense of job security due to the ease at which their employment could be terminated, rendering them a vulnerable class of workers.2 There was pandemonium in the employment sphere of society due to the abusive practices faced by employees employed in terms of Temporary Employment Services, this was accompanied by a call to ban labour broking. The legislature, while acknowledging the important role that this form of employment plays in the labour market and broader economy, opted for increased regulation of this and other types of non-standard employment; instead of an outright ban. As a result thereof, the Labour Relations Act3 was amended by the Labour Relations Amendment Act,4 with a view of improving the regulation and protection of employees engaged in these forms of non-standard or atypical employment. This study seeks to determine whether the amendments have achieved the purpose of enhancing the job security of these employees.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Tatchell, Veronique
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , South Africa -- Labour Relations Act, 1995 , Flexible work arrangements -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49027 , vital:41594
- Description: Historically, employers utilised non-standard or atypical forms of employment in order to avoid statutory obligations in respect of these employees, and in turn justify differential treatment of said employees.1 As a result, non-standard employees were not on the same footing as their permanent counterparts. They were not remunerated on the same level, were not privy to advancement and training opportunities, and did not enjoy a sense of job security due to the ease at which their employment could be terminated, rendering them a vulnerable class of workers.2 There was pandemonium in the employment sphere of society due to the abusive practices faced by employees employed in terms of Temporary Employment Services, this was accompanied by a call to ban labour broking. The legislature, while acknowledging the important role that this form of employment plays in the labour market and broader economy, opted for increased regulation of this and other types of non-standard employment; instead of an outright ban. As a result thereof, the Labour Relations Act3 was amended by the Labour Relations Amendment Act,4 with a view of improving the regulation and protection of employees engaged in these forms of non-standard or atypical employment. This study seeks to determine whether the amendments have achieved the purpose of enhancing the job security of these employees.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Rethinking minimum sentence Legislation
- Authors: Goliath, Alphonso Augustine
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Sentences (Criminal procedure) -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47370 , vital:39851
- Description: The harsh mandatory minimum sentences, introduced by the Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997, seemed like a good idea to politicians, as a means of countering the escalating crime rate experienced when South Africa transitioned to its new democracy, and to appease the public that something is being done about the issue. The plan was that everyone who committed the same crime would receive the same guaranteed sentence. Judges and Magistrates can only deviate from the predetermined sentences if they are satisfied that substantial and compelling circumstances exist, which would justify the imposition of a lesser sentence, limiting their flexibility. By doing so sentences would always be fair, politicians could be seen to be tough on crime and everyone would be satisfied. Unfortunately, this is not how minimum sentencing legislation turned out to be, as research has shown that it is not a deterrent for crime in South Africa or anywhere else. Instead of achieving consistency in sentencing, it worsens inconsistencies and disparities. With minimum sentencing legislation, the sentence for drug trafficking and murder is the same. Instinctively, human beings want to be safe and secure, but to lock up non-violent people for years will not make people feel safer. Due to the increased number of people serving life sentences and because non-violent offences are incorporated in the minimum sentencing legislation, our prison population has increased rapidly. Minimum sentencing legislation has several negative consequences, at a huge cost to South Africans, of which overcrowding of prisons is the most significant. Courts were tolerant with the poor language of the minimum sentencing legislation, as it was only supposed to be a temporary emergency measure against the high escalating violent crime experienced in South Africa post-1994. Since this Legislation became permanent in 2007, it is considerably different from the one considered in S v Dodo and a constitutional challenge is justifiable. With reference to the above, this research will reveal that minimum sentencing legislation did not deliver the desired results South Africa was hoping for and it is a vii major contributor to South Africa’s social retrograde. The rethinking of minimum sentencing legislation becomes imperative, bearing in mind that South Africa has previously researched sentencing alternatives at its disposal.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Goliath, Alphonso Augustine
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Sentences (Criminal procedure) -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47370 , vital:39851
- Description: The harsh mandatory minimum sentences, introduced by the Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997, seemed like a good idea to politicians, as a means of countering the escalating crime rate experienced when South Africa transitioned to its new democracy, and to appease the public that something is being done about the issue. The plan was that everyone who committed the same crime would receive the same guaranteed sentence. Judges and Magistrates can only deviate from the predetermined sentences if they are satisfied that substantial and compelling circumstances exist, which would justify the imposition of a lesser sentence, limiting their flexibility. By doing so sentences would always be fair, politicians could be seen to be tough on crime and everyone would be satisfied. Unfortunately, this is not how minimum sentencing legislation turned out to be, as research has shown that it is not a deterrent for crime in South Africa or anywhere else. Instead of achieving consistency in sentencing, it worsens inconsistencies and disparities. With minimum sentencing legislation, the sentence for drug trafficking and murder is the same. Instinctively, human beings want to be safe and secure, but to lock up non-violent people for years will not make people feel safer. Due to the increased number of people serving life sentences and because non-violent offences are incorporated in the minimum sentencing legislation, our prison population has increased rapidly. Minimum sentencing legislation has several negative consequences, at a huge cost to South Africans, of which overcrowding of prisons is the most significant. Courts were tolerant with the poor language of the minimum sentencing legislation, as it was only supposed to be a temporary emergency measure against the high escalating violent crime experienced in South Africa post-1994. Since this Legislation became permanent in 2007, it is considerably different from the one considered in S v Dodo and a constitutional challenge is justifiable. With reference to the above, this research will reveal that minimum sentencing legislation did not deliver the desired results South Africa was hoping for and it is a vii major contributor to South Africa’s social retrograde. The rethinking of minimum sentencing legislation becomes imperative, bearing in mind that South Africa has previously researched sentencing alternatives at its disposal.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
The African Continental Free Trade Agreement in Context
- Authors: Conjwa, Siviwe
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Customs unions -- Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47347 , vital:39849
- Description: The economic integration of the African continent has been an ideal pursued by most African states for a considerable number of years. This has been due to the notion that regional integration offers greater opportunities for developing states participating in global trade. Regional integration is regarded by some states as crucial to the alleviation of poverty on the African continent and, to this end, several African states have formed part of several regional blocs on the continent. The African Continental Free Trade Agreement (hereafter the AfCFTA) was signed in 2018, with the intention of removing barriers to the free movement of goods and services on the continent. The rationale behind the AfCFTA is that greater opportunities for the development of the African continent can be unlocked if the economies of the continent can be amalgamated into a single market. The AfCFTA is set to be the world’s largest free trade area, bringing together 55 states with a combined population of more than 1 billion people. This research contextualises the establishment of the AfCFTA within the greater context of the integration agenda of the African continent. Of particular significance is the role of the already existing Regional Economic Communities in the formulation of the AfCFTA, as well as the question as to whether global trade provisions regulating the creation of free trade areas have been complied with by the AfCFTA. The manner in which regional agreements are implemented by member states is also an important discussion that forms a part of this research. This is to ensure that some of the potential challenges in the implementation of the AfCFTA are laid bare, so as to ensure that the objectives thereof are attained as envisaged.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Conjwa, Siviwe
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Customs unions -- Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47347 , vital:39849
- Description: The economic integration of the African continent has been an ideal pursued by most African states for a considerable number of years. This has been due to the notion that regional integration offers greater opportunities for developing states participating in global trade. Regional integration is regarded by some states as crucial to the alleviation of poverty on the African continent and, to this end, several African states have formed part of several regional blocs on the continent. The African Continental Free Trade Agreement (hereafter the AfCFTA) was signed in 2018, with the intention of removing barriers to the free movement of goods and services on the continent. The rationale behind the AfCFTA is that greater opportunities for the development of the African continent can be unlocked if the economies of the continent can be amalgamated into a single market. The AfCFTA is set to be the world’s largest free trade area, bringing together 55 states with a combined population of more than 1 billion people. This research contextualises the establishment of the AfCFTA within the greater context of the integration agenda of the African continent. Of particular significance is the role of the already existing Regional Economic Communities in the formulation of the AfCFTA, as well as the question as to whether global trade provisions regulating the creation of free trade areas have been complied with by the AfCFTA. The manner in which regional agreements are implemented by member states is also an important discussion that forms a part of this research. This is to ensure that some of the potential challenges in the implementation of the AfCFTA are laid bare, so as to ensure that the objectives thereof are attained as envisaged.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
The ground of discrimination in equal pay for work of equal value disputes
- Authors: Coetzee, Mandy Nadine
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Equal pay for equal work -- Law and Legislation -- South Africa , Pay equity -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48971 , vital:41569
- Description: The Employment Equity Act places a positive obligation on employers to promote workplaces free from unfair discrimination. This obligation is reinforced by section 6 of the Employment Equity Act, commonly referred to as the prohibition clause. The 2014 amendments to the Employment Equity Act specifically introduced provisions relating to Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value which prior to 2014, had no specific provisions to guide employees and employers in relation to claims of discrimination, relating to remuneration and terms and conditions of employment. As such employees had to rely directly on section 6(1) to bring such claims which presented significant problems and challenges with the onus. The second key amendment for our purposes relates to the inclusion of the arbitrary ground under section 6(1) as a ground on which discrimination is also prohibited. In addition to the insertion and specific inclusion into law, the burden of proof in section 11 was also amended and must be read with the prohibition clause. It is this aspect which now confronts us with challenges and divergent approaches by the Courts and the development of the broad versus narrow approach in dealing with the ground of discrimination.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Coetzee, Mandy Nadine
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Equal pay for equal work -- Law and Legislation -- South Africa , Pay equity -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48971 , vital:41569
- Description: The Employment Equity Act places a positive obligation on employers to promote workplaces free from unfair discrimination. This obligation is reinforced by section 6 of the Employment Equity Act, commonly referred to as the prohibition clause. The 2014 amendments to the Employment Equity Act specifically introduced provisions relating to Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value which prior to 2014, had no specific provisions to guide employees and employers in relation to claims of discrimination, relating to remuneration and terms and conditions of employment. As such employees had to rely directly on section 6(1) to bring such claims which presented significant problems and challenges with the onus. The second key amendment for our purposes relates to the inclusion of the arbitrary ground under section 6(1) as a ground on which discrimination is also prohibited. In addition to the insertion and specific inclusion into law, the burden of proof in section 11 was also amended and must be read with the prohibition clause. It is this aspect which now confronts us with challenges and divergent approaches by the Courts and the development of the broad versus narrow approach in dealing with the ground of discrimination.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
The international arbitration act and dispute resolution
- Authors: Mkorongo, Michelle
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) -- Africa , International commercial arbitration
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49005 , vital:41592
- Description: Worldwide, states that had incorporated international standards of arbitration or drew influence from them, thrived in providing effective and efficient resolution of international commercial disputes. However, since 1965, there had been little to no increase in resolving international commercial disputes between private parties in South Africa, either through the court or arbitration. As a result, private parties were drawn to arbitrating in states that had incorporated these international standards and conformed to the aim of unifying arbitral regulation. This study aims to determine what South Africa’s response was in dealing with international commercial disputes and the development of arbitration as an appropriate dispute resolution mechanism. Based on the premise that arbitration is regarded as a popular dispute resolution mechanism when it comes to international trade transactions globally, this study will unpack why arbitration in South Africa did not reflect this premise. A thorough analysis of how international arbitration and its regulation developed globally will be conducted to show at what point uniform regulation came about. The results will indicate in what ways South Africa’s regulatory framework was insufficient to deal with international arbitration and will show how it took a considerable amount of time to regulate arbitration appropriately. Upon regulating international arbitration in 2017, the study will show other ways that South Africa can enhance itself in terms of providing a comprehensive regulatory framework and position itself as an ideal seat of arbitration in Africa.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Mkorongo, Michelle
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) -- Africa , International commercial arbitration
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49005 , vital:41592
- Description: Worldwide, states that had incorporated international standards of arbitration or drew influence from them, thrived in providing effective and efficient resolution of international commercial disputes. However, since 1965, there had been little to no increase in resolving international commercial disputes between private parties in South Africa, either through the court or arbitration. As a result, private parties were drawn to arbitrating in states that had incorporated these international standards and conformed to the aim of unifying arbitral regulation. This study aims to determine what South Africa’s response was in dealing with international commercial disputes and the development of arbitration as an appropriate dispute resolution mechanism. Based on the premise that arbitration is regarded as a popular dispute resolution mechanism when it comes to international trade transactions globally, this study will unpack why arbitration in South Africa did not reflect this premise. A thorough analysis of how international arbitration and its regulation developed globally will be conducted to show at what point uniform regulation came about. The results will indicate in what ways South Africa’s regulatory framework was insufficient to deal with international arbitration and will show how it took a considerable amount of time to regulate arbitration appropriately. Upon regulating international arbitration in 2017, the study will show other ways that South Africa can enhance itself in terms of providing a comprehensive regulatory framework and position itself as an ideal seat of arbitration in Africa.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
The legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in the contract of employment
- Authors: Mbewana, Ntsikelelo Elliot
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor contract -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48993 , vital:41575
- Description: This study seeks to determine the legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in a contract of employment. Our law seems to have two different procedures in dealing with this issue. The first aspect is to determine whether the automatic termination clause is inserted in a contract of employment merely to circumvent the provisions of the Labour Relations Act (LRA), in particular section 5(2)(b) of the LRA. If the intention is found to be to circumvent the purpose of the said provisions of the Act, then an automatic termination clause is not allowed and any termination of the contract resulting therefrom becomes a dismissal challengeable at the CCMA, Bargaining Council or Labour Court depending on the issue at hand. In the alternative, there is no dismissal for the purposes of section 186(1) of the Act in circumstances where the end of an agreed fixed term is defined by the occurrence of a particular event. Put differently, there is no dismissal when the agreed and anticipated event materialises. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that everyone has the right to fair labour practices. This provision guarantees the right not to be unfairly dismissed and is in line with Article 4 of Convention 158 of the International Labour Organisation which provides that the employment of a worker shall not be terminated unless there is a valid reason for such termination connected with the capacity or conduct of the worker or based on operational requirements of the undertaking, establishment or service. This study aims to investigate the question of the legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in a contract of employment by analysing inter alia, the Constitution, LRA, ILO recommendations and the authorities in order to determine the extent of protection afforded to employees against employers.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Mbewana, Ntsikelelo Elliot
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor contract -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48993 , vital:41575
- Description: This study seeks to determine the legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in a contract of employment. Our law seems to have two different procedures in dealing with this issue. The first aspect is to determine whether the automatic termination clause is inserted in a contract of employment merely to circumvent the provisions of the Labour Relations Act (LRA), in particular section 5(2)(b) of the LRA. If the intention is found to be to circumvent the purpose of the said provisions of the Act, then an automatic termination clause is not allowed and any termination of the contract resulting therefrom becomes a dismissal challengeable at the CCMA, Bargaining Council or Labour Court depending on the issue at hand. In the alternative, there is no dismissal for the purposes of section 186(1) of the Act in circumstances where the end of an agreed fixed term is defined by the occurrence of a particular event. Put differently, there is no dismissal when the agreed and anticipated event materialises. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that everyone has the right to fair labour practices. This provision guarantees the right not to be unfairly dismissed and is in line with Article 4 of Convention 158 of the International Labour Organisation which provides that the employment of a worker shall not be terminated unless there is a valid reason for such termination connected with the capacity or conduct of the worker or based on operational requirements of the undertaking, establishment or service. This study aims to investigate the question of the legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in a contract of employment by analysing inter alia, the Constitution, LRA, ILO recommendations and the authorities in order to determine the extent of protection afforded to employees against employers.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
The national health insurance bill: a measure to realise the right to access health care services
- Authors: Moyo, Priscilla Tariro
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Medical laws and legislation -- South Africa , Health insurance -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49016 , vital:41593
- Description: The right to access health care services is enshrined in section 27 of the Constitution. It is a right afforded to everyone. The state is required to adopt legislative and other measures for the progressive realisation of this right. To that effect, the state has passed various pieces of legislation aimed at realising the right to access health care services. The key legislative measures regulating the health system are the National Health Act, the Medical Schemes Act and the Medicines Act. Despite the various legislative measures in place, not everyone has access to health care services and there is a need for reform in the health system. To remedy the problem of inaccessibility, the government introduced the NHI Bill in 2018 which was amended in 2019. The NHI Bill purports to amend the way in which health services are financed. The purpose of this research is to determine the constitutionality of selected aspects of the NHI Bill. Section 27(2) of the Constitution requires that any measure adopted by the state in realising the right to access health care services must be reasonable. This research, therefore, assesses whether the NHI Bill is a reasonable measure that meets the requirements of section 27(2). The NHI Bill will be assessed in light of the reasonableness review used to assess state compliance with the obligation in terms of section 27. In assessing the reasonableness of the NHI Bill, reference is made to the domestic obligations of the state to realise the right to access health care services, the context in which the NHI Bill was published, the provisions of international law, and the impact the NHI Bill will have on other rights specifically the right to equality. The findings of this research are that the NHI Bill is likely to be found unconstitutional insofar as it unfairly discriminates against asylum seekers and undocumented migrants and lacks clarity with respect to important issues such as the role of medical schemes. Based on this analysis, recommendations are made to ensure that the NHI Bill is constitutionally sound.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Moyo, Priscilla Tariro
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Medical laws and legislation -- South Africa , Health insurance -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49016 , vital:41593
- Description: The right to access health care services is enshrined in section 27 of the Constitution. It is a right afforded to everyone. The state is required to adopt legislative and other measures for the progressive realisation of this right. To that effect, the state has passed various pieces of legislation aimed at realising the right to access health care services. The key legislative measures regulating the health system are the National Health Act, the Medical Schemes Act and the Medicines Act. Despite the various legislative measures in place, not everyone has access to health care services and there is a need for reform in the health system. To remedy the problem of inaccessibility, the government introduced the NHI Bill in 2018 which was amended in 2019. The NHI Bill purports to amend the way in which health services are financed. The purpose of this research is to determine the constitutionality of selected aspects of the NHI Bill. Section 27(2) of the Constitution requires that any measure adopted by the state in realising the right to access health care services must be reasonable. This research, therefore, assesses whether the NHI Bill is a reasonable measure that meets the requirements of section 27(2). The NHI Bill will be assessed in light of the reasonableness review used to assess state compliance with the obligation in terms of section 27. In assessing the reasonableness of the NHI Bill, reference is made to the domestic obligations of the state to realise the right to access health care services, the context in which the NHI Bill was published, the provisions of international law, and the impact the NHI Bill will have on other rights specifically the right to equality. The findings of this research are that the NHI Bill is likely to be found unconstitutional insofar as it unfairly discriminates against asylum seekers and undocumented migrants and lacks clarity with respect to important issues such as the role of medical schemes. Based on this analysis, recommendations are made to ensure that the NHI Bill is constitutionally sound.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
The regulation of the use of cannibis in the workplace
- Authors: Oberem, stacy Lee
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Cannabis -- Law and legislation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47403 , vital:39978
- Description: This treatise considers the implications of the judgment in Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Prince (2018) ZACC 30 in the workplace. It includes a critical study of cases prior and post the judgment and identifies the gaps within those judgments. It will consider various legislation pertaining to the topic and the critical differences when it comes to testing for intoxication of alcohol versus cannabis. To conclude, it will consider the challenges of having a zero-tolerance policy in the workplace and provide recommendations to employer’s substance abuse policies specifically relating to the use of cannabis and its effects within the workplace.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Oberem, stacy Lee
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Cannabis -- Law and legislation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47403 , vital:39978
- Description: This treatise considers the implications of the judgment in Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Prince (2018) ZACC 30 in the workplace. It includes a critical study of cases prior and post the judgment and identifies the gaps within those judgments. It will consider various legislation pertaining to the topic and the critical differences when it comes to testing for intoxication of alcohol versus cannabis. To conclude, it will consider the challenges of having a zero-tolerance policy in the workplace and provide recommendations to employer’s substance abuse policies specifically relating to the use of cannabis and its effects within the workplace.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
The validity of dismissals for refusing to accept changes to terms and conditions of employment
- Authors: Bosch, Lauren
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47336 , vital:39848
- Description: Operational circumstances often create the need for employers to change the employment conditions of employees. Such conditions can include difficulty in obtaining raw materials which may require employees to do different work, a takeover or a merger, market shifts, orders from clients, an increase or reduction in work volumes, new technology, or even in some instances skill shortages. Regardless of the reason, in order to allow the business to remain operational, employers are often obligated to change terms and conditions of employment. Section 187 of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 deals with automatically unfair dismissals and lists a number of reasons for dismissal that, if it complies with the requirements listed, the dismissal will be found to be automatically unfair. The definition was amended by the Labour Relations Amendment Act 6 of 2014 as a result of the courts incorrectly interpreting this section in Chemical Workers Industrial Union (CWIU) v Algorax (Pty) Limited (2003 11 BLLR 1081) (Algorax) and Fry's Metals (Pty) Limited v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa and Others (JA9/01) [2002] ZALAC 25 (Fry’s Metals). Section 187(1)(c) of the LRA has always been contentious due to the fact that the definition of automatically unfair dismissals, employers’ rights to terminate contracts of employment on the basis of operational requirements and the institution of collective bargaining are intertwined. The Labour Relations Amendment Act of 2014 brought about significant changes to how section 187(1)(c) should be interpreted and fundamentally changed the enquiry that should be adopted when determining cases of this nature. The main aim of this study is to provide clarity to the question of when will it be valid and fair for an employer, in the course of restructuring his business, to dismiss any of his employees who refuse to accept the proposed changes to the terms and conditions of their employment.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Bosch, Lauren
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47336 , vital:39848
- Description: Operational circumstances often create the need for employers to change the employment conditions of employees. Such conditions can include difficulty in obtaining raw materials which may require employees to do different work, a takeover or a merger, market shifts, orders from clients, an increase or reduction in work volumes, new technology, or even in some instances skill shortages. Regardless of the reason, in order to allow the business to remain operational, employers are often obligated to change terms and conditions of employment. Section 187 of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 deals with automatically unfair dismissals and lists a number of reasons for dismissal that, if it complies with the requirements listed, the dismissal will be found to be automatically unfair. The definition was amended by the Labour Relations Amendment Act 6 of 2014 as a result of the courts incorrectly interpreting this section in Chemical Workers Industrial Union (CWIU) v Algorax (Pty) Limited (2003 11 BLLR 1081) (Algorax) and Fry's Metals (Pty) Limited v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa and Others (JA9/01) [2002] ZALAC 25 (Fry’s Metals). Section 187(1)(c) of the LRA has always been contentious due to the fact that the definition of automatically unfair dismissals, employers’ rights to terminate contracts of employment on the basis of operational requirements and the institution of collective bargaining are intertwined. The Labour Relations Amendment Act of 2014 brought about significant changes to how section 187(1)(c) should be interpreted and fundamentally changed the enquiry that should be adopted when determining cases of this nature. The main aim of this study is to provide clarity to the question of when will it be valid and fair for an employer, in the course of restructuring his business, to dismiss any of his employees who refuse to accept the proposed changes to the terms and conditions of their employment.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Unfair discrimination relating to mental illness
- Authors: Skosana, Hlengiwe
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Discrimination -- Mental health
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47443 , vital:39991
- Description: Section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 provides that everyone has the right to equality. The Employment Equity Act, the Promotion and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act and the Labour Relations Act were promulgated to fulfil the Constitution’s goals of promoting equality and prohibiting unfair discrimination. Section 6(1) of The Employment Equity Act promotes equality in the workplace and prohibits unfair discrimination; section 187 of the Labour Relations Act provides that dismissals on the grounds listed in the section are automatically unfair; and section 6 of the Promotion and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act prohibits unfair discrimination in general. International law prohibits unfair discrimination. Article 1 of the International Labour Organisation’s Convention concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation provides that discrimination in the workplace that has the effect of impairing or nullifying equal opportunity or treatment is prohibited; Article 7 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights provides that all are equal before the law and are entitled to protection against any discrimination; and the United Nations Charter and the African United Charter on Human and People’s Rights both promote the right to equality. South Africa has signed and/or ratified these international anti-discrimination laws, and is, accordingly, bound by them. The South African anti-discrimination legislation and international anti-discrimination laws prohibit unfair discrimination, whether it is direct or indirect, or on a listed (that is, a specified ground such as race or disability) or unlisted ground, on a policy, rule or practice. Discrimination based on a listed ground is presumed to be unfair. If discrimination is based on an unlisted ground, the complainant must prove that the discrimination is unfair by applying the Harksen v Lane NO 1997 (11) BCLR 1489 (CC) test. The Harksen v Lane NO test asks whether the discrimination has the attributes and characteristics which have the potential to impair the fundamental human dignity of persons as human beings or to affect them adversely in a comparably serious manner. If the answer is yes, the discrimination is unfair. Mental illness is not a listed ground, meaning it is unlisted. The Labour Appeal Court and Labour Court have, therefore, had to consider whether discriminating against an employee on the basis of their mental illness is unfair, or dismissing them because of their mental illness constituted an automatically unfair dismissal. In the leading case of New Way Motor & Diesel Engineering (Pty)Ltd v Marsland [2009] 12 BLLR 1181 (LAC), the Labour Appeal Court applied the Harksen v Lane NO test and held that the employee’s dismissal was automatically unfair in terms of section 187(1)(f) of the Labour Relations Act. In the recent case of Jansen v Legal Aid South Africa (JA121/2014) [2018] ZALCCT 17, the Labour Court agreed with the Labour Appeal Court decision in New Way Motor & Diesel Engineering (Pty) Ltd v Marsland that dismissing an employee because of their mental illness is automatically unfair in terms of section 187(1)(f) of the LRA, and unfair discrimination in terms of section 6(1) of the EEA. Despite the consistency in case law, the anti-discrimination legislation does not list mental illness as an unfair ground, which means unfairness cannot be presumed. The complainant must, accordingly, prove the dismissal is automatically unfair in terms of section 187(1)(f) of the LRA or that it is unfair discrimination in terms of section 6(1) of the EEA.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Skosana, Hlengiwe
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Discrimination -- Mental health
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47443 , vital:39991
- Description: Section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 provides that everyone has the right to equality. The Employment Equity Act, the Promotion and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act and the Labour Relations Act were promulgated to fulfil the Constitution’s goals of promoting equality and prohibiting unfair discrimination. Section 6(1) of The Employment Equity Act promotes equality in the workplace and prohibits unfair discrimination; section 187 of the Labour Relations Act provides that dismissals on the grounds listed in the section are automatically unfair; and section 6 of the Promotion and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act prohibits unfair discrimination in general. International law prohibits unfair discrimination. Article 1 of the International Labour Organisation’s Convention concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation provides that discrimination in the workplace that has the effect of impairing or nullifying equal opportunity or treatment is prohibited; Article 7 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights provides that all are equal before the law and are entitled to protection against any discrimination; and the United Nations Charter and the African United Charter on Human and People’s Rights both promote the right to equality. South Africa has signed and/or ratified these international anti-discrimination laws, and is, accordingly, bound by them. The South African anti-discrimination legislation and international anti-discrimination laws prohibit unfair discrimination, whether it is direct or indirect, or on a listed (that is, a specified ground such as race or disability) or unlisted ground, on a policy, rule or practice. Discrimination based on a listed ground is presumed to be unfair. If discrimination is based on an unlisted ground, the complainant must prove that the discrimination is unfair by applying the Harksen v Lane NO 1997 (11) BCLR 1489 (CC) test. The Harksen v Lane NO test asks whether the discrimination has the attributes and characteristics which have the potential to impair the fundamental human dignity of persons as human beings or to affect them adversely in a comparably serious manner. If the answer is yes, the discrimination is unfair. Mental illness is not a listed ground, meaning it is unlisted. The Labour Appeal Court and Labour Court have, therefore, had to consider whether discriminating against an employee on the basis of their mental illness is unfair, or dismissing them because of their mental illness constituted an automatically unfair dismissal. In the leading case of New Way Motor & Diesel Engineering (Pty)Ltd v Marsland [2009] 12 BLLR 1181 (LAC), the Labour Appeal Court applied the Harksen v Lane NO test and held that the employee’s dismissal was automatically unfair in terms of section 187(1)(f) of the Labour Relations Act. In the recent case of Jansen v Legal Aid South Africa (JA121/2014) [2018] ZALCCT 17, the Labour Court agreed with the Labour Appeal Court decision in New Way Motor & Diesel Engineering (Pty) Ltd v Marsland that dismissing an employee because of their mental illness is automatically unfair in terms of section 187(1)(f) of the LRA, and unfair discrimination in terms of section 6(1) of the EEA. Despite the consistency in case law, the anti-discrimination legislation does not list mental illness as an unfair ground, which means unfairness cannot be presumed. The complainant must, accordingly, prove the dismissal is automatically unfair in terms of section 187(1)(f) of the LRA or that it is unfair discrimination in terms of section 6(1) of the EEA.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
A critical analysis of South African anti-money laundering legislation regarding cryptocurrency
- Authors: Bowden, Susan
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Money laundering -- South Africa , Money -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Electronic funds transfers Money -- Technological innovations
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/42107 , vital:36626
- Description: Cryptocurrencies are decentralised virtual currencies, using blockchain technology to process peer-to-peer electronic payments. In 2009, the first successful cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, was established. As a result of the Internet, cryptocurrencies had soon made their way into South Africa. As such, cryptocurrencies are currently not included under the definition of a legal tender and therefore remain unregulated by the legal framework. This issue is examined within this research project. The objectives were to understand the concepts of cryptocurrency, the relevance in the financial sector, the associated risks and to establish whether regulatory interference is necessary for the operation of cryptocurrency. The legal and regulatory framework of cryptocurrencies within Canada, the United States of America and the European Union were compared to that of South Africa. The research explained that cryptocurrencies are decentralised convertible currencies which are secured by cryptography. It highlighted the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, some of which are detrimental due to the wide use of cryptocurrencies. One of the risks included using cryptocurrencies to launder money. In order to mitigate these risks, jurisdictions such as Canada, the United States of America and the European Union have begun to regulate cryptocurrencies by establishing a legal framework for its operation. However, no such legal framework existed in South Africa for the regulation of cryptocurrencies. As a result, the South African Reserve Bank and National Treasury released position papers, which warn consumers of the associated risks. Therefore, the conclusion was made that regulatory intervention is necessary in South Africa. Following this, the recommendation was made to integrate cryptocurrencies into relevant existing legislation. It was recommended that regulation is the most effective method of combatting money laundering using cryptocurrencies.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Bowden, Susan
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Money laundering -- South Africa , Money -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Electronic funds transfers Money -- Technological innovations
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/42107 , vital:36626
- Description: Cryptocurrencies are decentralised virtual currencies, using blockchain technology to process peer-to-peer electronic payments. In 2009, the first successful cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, was established. As a result of the Internet, cryptocurrencies had soon made their way into South Africa. As such, cryptocurrencies are currently not included under the definition of a legal tender and therefore remain unregulated by the legal framework. This issue is examined within this research project. The objectives were to understand the concepts of cryptocurrency, the relevance in the financial sector, the associated risks and to establish whether regulatory interference is necessary for the operation of cryptocurrency. The legal and regulatory framework of cryptocurrencies within Canada, the United States of America and the European Union were compared to that of South Africa. The research explained that cryptocurrencies are decentralised convertible currencies which are secured by cryptography. It highlighted the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, some of which are detrimental due to the wide use of cryptocurrencies. One of the risks included using cryptocurrencies to launder money. In order to mitigate these risks, jurisdictions such as Canada, the United States of America and the European Union have begun to regulate cryptocurrencies by establishing a legal framework for its operation. However, no such legal framework existed in South Africa for the regulation of cryptocurrencies. As a result, the South African Reserve Bank and National Treasury released position papers, which warn consumers of the associated risks. Therefore, the conclusion was made that regulatory intervention is necessary in South Africa. Following this, the recommendation was made to integrate cryptocurrencies into relevant existing legislation. It was recommended that regulation is the most effective method of combatting money laundering using cryptocurrencies.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Accountability of United Nations peacekeepers for sexual violence
- Authors: Maseka, Ntemesha Mwila
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: United Nations -- Peacekeeping forces , Sex crimes Women (International law) Women -- Crimes against Women (International law)
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/${Handle} , vital:36279
- Description: Over the last three decades reports of sexual exploitation and abuse by UN peacekeepers while on mission have emerged with predictable regularity. What is particularly disturbing is that peacekeepers, who are viewed as representatives of the international community in the arduous environments in which they operate, commit these crimes against the local population with apparent impunity. This impunity is rooted in the perception that peacekeepers are immune from prosecution for crimes they commit while deployed – which in most cases has not been far from the truth. This dissertation considers whether a lacuna in the existing law causes the impunity and thus lack of accountability of peacekeepers who commit sexual violence. The study considers this question from three main angles: the legal status of peacekeepers, the lex specialis prohibition of sexual violence and the domestic application of the law using South Africa as an example. The determination of the legal status of peacekeepers is the first port of call to establish the applicable framework when crimes are committed and the source of their immunity. To achieve this, a framework of UN peacekeeping operations is outlined which considers the origin, constitutional basis and legal principles governing such operations culminating in a definition of peacekeeping. The study relies on the definition of peacekeeping advanced by the Capstone Doctrine which besides sitting at the top of the doctrinal framework governing UN operations, identifies three categories of peacekeepers - military, police and civilian personnel. This distinction is important because each category is subject to different rules. The study concentrates only on the military personnel who form the largest contingent of peacekeepers, who are the most likely offenders and who are immune from host state jurisdiction. It is submitted that while peacekeepers’ immunity is based on the status-of-forces agreement concluded between the UN and a troop-contributing country, the doctrine of sovereign immunity confirms that one State cannot exercise jurisdiction over another State’s armed forces. This does not mean such forces exist in a legal vacuum, but rather the troop-contributing country is obliged to exercise criminal and disciplinary jurisdiction over them. Due to the operational environment of UN peacekeeping operations, IHL is identified as the lex specialis. A synopsis of this densely codified body of law reveals sexual violence is prohibited both expressly and implicitly in treaty and customary law. The study contends with the applicability of IHL to UN peacekeeping operations, drawing the conclusion that while it can be applied, the obligation for enforcement ultimately lies with individual States. South Africa’s legislative framework is examined, specifically the Implementation of the Geneva Conventions Act to determine whether the State complies with its IHL obligations which includes the exercise of criminal jurisdiction over peacekeepers deployed on a UN mission. The study concludes that while there is a complex relationship between international and national law applicable to peacekeepers when they commit a crime, the law – at least in the South African case - is not deficient. Based on the analysis, recommendations are proposed to ensure the accountability of peacekeepers who commit sexual violence.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Maseka, Ntemesha Mwila
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: United Nations -- Peacekeeping forces , Sex crimes Women (International law) Women -- Crimes against Women (International law)
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/${Handle} , vital:36279
- Description: Over the last three decades reports of sexual exploitation and abuse by UN peacekeepers while on mission have emerged with predictable regularity. What is particularly disturbing is that peacekeepers, who are viewed as representatives of the international community in the arduous environments in which they operate, commit these crimes against the local population with apparent impunity. This impunity is rooted in the perception that peacekeepers are immune from prosecution for crimes they commit while deployed – which in most cases has not been far from the truth. This dissertation considers whether a lacuna in the existing law causes the impunity and thus lack of accountability of peacekeepers who commit sexual violence. The study considers this question from three main angles: the legal status of peacekeepers, the lex specialis prohibition of sexual violence and the domestic application of the law using South Africa as an example. The determination of the legal status of peacekeepers is the first port of call to establish the applicable framework when crimes are committed and the source of their immunity. To achieve this, a framework of UN peacekeeping operations is outlined which considers the origin, constitutional basis and legal principles governing such operations culminating in a definition of peacekeeping. The study relies on the definition of peacekeeping advanced by the Capstone Doctrine which besides sitting at the top of the doctrinal framework governing UN operations, identifies three categories of peacekeepers - military, police and civilian personnel. This distinction is important because each category is subject to different rules. The study concentrates only on the military personnel who form the largest contingent of peacekeepers, who are the most likely offenders and who are immune from host state jurisdiction. It is submitted that while peacekeepers’ immunity is based on the status-of-forces agreement concluded between the UN and a troop-contributing country, the doctrine of sovereign immunity confirms that one State cannot exercise jurisdiction over another State’s armed forces. This does not mean such forces exist in a legal vacuum, but rather the troop-contributing country is obliged to exercise criminal and disciplinary jurisdiction over them. Due to the operational environment of UN peacekeeping operations, IHL is identified as the lex specialis. A synopsis of this densely codified body of law reveals sexual violence is prohibited both expressly and implicitly in treaty and customary law. The study contends with the applicability of IHL to UN peacekeeping operations, drawing the conclusion that while it can be applied, the obligation for enforcement ultimately lies with individual States. South Africa’s legislative framework is examined, specifically the Implementation of the Geneva Conventions Act to determine whether the State complies with its IHL obligations which includes the exercise of criminal jurisdiction over peacekeepers deployed on a UN mission. The study concludes that while there is a complex relationship between international and national law applicable to peacekeepers when they commit a crime, the law – at least in the South African case - is not deficient. Based on the analysis, recommendations are proposed to ensure the accountability of peacekeepers who commit sexual violence.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
An investigation of the extent, effects and impact of Gender-based Violence in Duncan Village, East London
- Authors: Peter, Noma-Afrika
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Violence -- Sex differences Human rights
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , M.Phil (Human rights)
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/16851 , vital:40779
- Description: This research seeks to investigate GBV against women in Duncan Village in the East London area to find out the extent of the prevalence, its effect, and remedial solutions. The study adopted a qualitative method. The data was collected through semi-structured one-to one interviews from 16 participants using systematic random sampling. The findings revealed that GBV is prevalent in Duncan Village. Most of the women residing in Duncan Village are dependent on child support grant and raise their children alone without the support of their biological fathers. The study further revealed that GBV against women often happens during day time and the victims are either married or single women. One of the contributing factors of GBV is unemployment. Therefore, this study recommends that awareness of GBV should be made continuously in communities by the government and stakeholders. In addition, the Commission for Gender Equality and NGOs that deal with GBV should be visible in all wards so that their services are known and utilised. The Department of Women Affairs should be the main driver in ensuring that women from previously disadvantaged communities are economically empowered, for example, by initiating income generating projects. However, they too should first be capacitated on business and financial management skills.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Peter, Noma-Afrika
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Violence -- Sex differences Human rights
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , M.Phil (Human rights)
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/16851 , vital:40779
- Description: This research seeks to investigate GBV against women in Duncan Village in the East London area to find out the extent of the prevalence, its effect, and remedial solutions. The study adopted a qualitative method. The data was collected through semi-structured one-to one interviews from 16 participants using systematic random sampling. The findings revealed that GBV is prevalent in Duncan Village. Most of the women residing in Duncan Village are dependent on child support grant and raise their children alone without the support of their biological fathers. The study further revealed that GBV against women often happens during day time and the victims are either married or single women. One of the contributing factors of GBV is unemployment. Therefore, this study recommends that awareness of GBV should be made continuously in communities by the government and stakeholders. In addition, the Commission for Gender Equality and NGOs that deal with GBV should be visible in all wards so that their services are known and utilised. The Department of Women Affairs should be the main driver in ensuring that women from previously disadvantaged communities are economically empowered, for example, by initiating income generating projects. However, they too should first be capacitated on business and financial management skills.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Automatic termination clauses in employment contracts
- Authors: Ndzendze, Kutala
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Labor contract -- South Africa , Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/41808 , vital:36594
- Description: This study aims to establish Automatic Termination Clauses in Employment contracts by analyzing the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Labour Relations Act and the precedents. The automatic termination of employment contract means that the contract is terminated without giving an employee the opportunity to state his or her version as per the audi alteram partem principle. In essence, the employee is deprived of his or her right to a fair dismissal as outlined in the Labour Relations Act. The automatic termination clauses in employment contract means that the employment contract will come to an end when the employee’s services are no longer required or when the employer simply does no longer want to keep the employee at work. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that “everyone has the right to fair labour practices”.1 In terms of the Labour Relations Act (hereinafter referred to as “the LRA”),2 every employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed. An employment contract between an employee and employer arises out of a contract to perform services. This is so whether the contract is in writing or not. Dismissal is defined in the LRA3 as where the employer has terminated employment with or without a notice. The thesis is composed of five chapters, each of them dealing with different aspects of automatic termination clauses in employment contracts.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Ndzendze, Kutala
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Labor contract -- South Africa , Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/41808 , vital:36594
- Description: This study aims to establish Automatic Termination Clauses in Employment contracts by analyzing the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Labour Relations Act and the precedents. The automatic termination of employment contract means that the contract is terminated without giving an employee the opportunity to state his or her version as per the audi alteram partem principle. In essence, the employee is deprived of his or her right to a fair dismissal as outlined in the Labour Relations Act. The automatic termination clauses in employment contract means that the employment contract will come to an end when the employee’s services are no longer required or when the employer simply does no longer want to keep the employee at work. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that “everyone has the right to fair labour practices”.1 In terms of the Labour Relations Act (hereinafter referred to as “the LRA”),2 every employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed. An employment contract between an employee and employer arises out of a contract to perform services. This is so whether the contract is in writing or not. Dismissal is defined in the LRA3 as where the employer has terminated employment with or without a notice. The thesis is composed of five chapters, each of them dealing with different aspects of automatic termination clauses in employment contracts.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Dismissal for ill health or injury and reasonable accommodation for disabled employees
- Authors: Mabenge, Mfundiso Samson
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Discrimination in employment -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/34755 , vital:33437
- Description: This treatise examines the challenges faced by people with disabilities, in particular, dismissal and discrimination at the workplace. The study employed a qualitative approach to explore and address the research questions. It highlights that the Constitution provides protection against discrimination on the ground of disability. This right not to be discriminated against or unfairly dismissed is further given effect by the Codes of Good Practice in both the EEA and the LRA. Dismissal on a prohibited ground of discrimination, such as disability, is not merely unfair, but automatically unfair. Despite the above legislative protection, the findings in this study indicate that South Africa still faces huge challenges of disability discrimination and dismissal. Notwithstanding the increased sensitivity of this subject across the country, applicants for work and employees generally find themselves to be the victims of employment discrimination as well as dismissal due to their disability. Those who are in the working sector are not reasonably accommodated. The study submits that people with disabilities should be reasonably accommodated and be retained in the working sector as they have a positive role to play in the economy. In terms of legislation, the study found that although well written in theory, they are practically ineffective given that they are fragmented. This study observes that single legislation dealing comprehensively with disability management, like in other jurisdictions does not exist in South Africa. The lack of such single legislation is a significant weakness in the South African disability management framework. Therefore, this has resulted in a fragmented approach to implementation. The study suggests that trade union representatives and employers should be well trained, particularly on issues relating to dismissal for incapacity in general. From a global perspective, international organisations through ratifying Conventions have also heeded to the plight of disabled persons. This is proof that disability can no longer be confined to the borders of one nation. Many disability organisations have emerged over the years and are representing the interests of the disabled. The findings of this study may help companies, organisations and institutions improve their policy practices regarding the dismissal of employees associated with ill health or injury.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Mabenge, Mfundiso Samson
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Discrimination in employment -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/34755 , vital:33437
- Description: This treatise examines the challenges faced by people with disabilities, in particular, dismissal and discrimination at the workplace. The study employed a qualitative approach to explore and address the research questions. It highlights that the Constitution provides protection against discrimination on the ground of disability. This right not to be discriminated against or unfairly dismissed is further given effect by the Codes of Good Practice in both the EEA and the LRA. Dismissal on a prohibited ground of discrimination, such as disability, is not merely unfair, but automatically unfair. Despite the above legislative protection, the findings in this study indicate that South Africa still faces huge challenges of disability discrimination and dismissal. Notwithstanding the increased sensitivity of this subject across the country, applicants for work and employees generally find themselves to be the victims of employment discrimination as well as dismissal due to their disability. Those who are in the working sector are not reasonably accommodated. The study submits that people with disabilities should be reasonably accommodated and be retained in the working sector as they have a positive role to play in the economy. In terms of legislation, the study found that although well written in theory, they are practically ineffective given that they are fragmented. This study observes that single legislation dealing comprehensively with disability management, like in other jurisdictions does not exist in South Africa. The lack of such single legislation is a significant weakness in the South African disability management framework. Therefore, this has resulted in a fragmented approach to implementation. The study suggests that trade union representatives and employers should be well trained, particularly on issues relating to dismissal for incapacity in general. From a global perspective, international organisations through ratifying Conventions have also heeded to the plight of disabled persons. This is proof that disability can no longer be confined to the borders of one nation. Many disability organisations have emerged over the years and are representing the interests of the disabled. The findings of this study may help companies, organisations and institutions improve their policy practices regarding the dismissal of employees associated with ill health or injury.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Equal pay for work of equal value
- Authors: Leo, Aloshea Doreen
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Equal pay for equal work -- Law and Legislation -- South Africa , Pay equity -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/40445 , vital:36166
- Description: Since the end of the Apartheid Regime, various labour legislation has been enacted over the years to eliminate discrimination and grant everyone in South Africa the right to fair labour practices, including the prohibition of unfair payment practices in terms of item 2(1)(a) of Schedule 7 of the Labour Relations Act.1 The above item was repealed and replaced with an express provision strictly prohibiting unfair discrimination in any employment practice or policy.2 However, even though this express provision strictly prohibited unfair discrimination in employment, the International Labour Organisation criticised South Africa for the failure to include an express provision dealing specifically with equal remuneration in terms of the Employment Equity Act.3 Because of this criticism, sections 6(4) and (5)4 were introduced. Section 6(4) amendments were obviously not been successful as intended, as numerous employees still are facing unfair discrimination based on the wages. Looking at Case law in the United Kingdom, there are clearly principles and successes that South Africa can learn from and incorporate in South African labour law. Some successes include the proactivity of employers who identify groups of employees, which are performing work that is of equal value, comparing their salaries, and by investigating and removing pay gap causes. Another success is the use of reports of independent experts who can assess the value of different occupations. If South Africa does this, it will alleviate the pressure placed upon courts that do not have the necessary expertise to decide on the value.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Leo, Aloshea Doreen
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Equal pay for equal work -- Law and Legislation -- South Africa , Pay equity -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/40445 , vital:36166
- Description: Since the end of the Apartheid Regime, various labour legislation has been enacted over the years to eliminate discrimination and grant everyone in South Africa the right to fair labour practices, including the prohibition of unfair payment practices in terms of item 2(1)(a) of Schedule 7 of the Labour Relations Act.1 The above item was repealed and replaced with an express provision strictly prohibiting unfair discrimination in any employment practice or policy.2 However, even though this express provision strictly prohibited unfair discrimination in employment, the International Labour Organisation criticised South Africa for the failure to include an express provision dealing specifically with equal remuneration in terms of the Employment Equity Act.3 Because of this criticism, sections 6(4) and (5)4 were introduced. Section 6(4) amendments were obviously not been successful as intended, as numerous employees still are facing unfair discrimination based on the wages. Looking at Case law in the United Kingdom, there are clearly principles and successes that South Africa can learn from and incorporate in South African labour law. Some successes include the proactivity of employers who identify groups of employees, which are performing work that is of equal value, comparing their salaries, and by investigating and removing pay gap causes. Another success is the use of reports of independent experts who can assess the value of different occupations. If South Africa does this, it will alleviate the pressure placed upon courts that do not have the necessary expertise to decide on the value.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019