https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3037 Wed 12 May 2021 23:31:35 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3070 Wed 12 May 2021 23:28:26 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3038 Wed 12 May 2021 20:59:41 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:2984 Wed 12 May 2021 19:09:54 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3013 Wed 12 May 2021 18:37:06 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3025 40 years), which were then differentiated according to gender, reproductive status, and relationship status. Treating the interviews as jointly produced narratives, I analysed them by means of a performativity/performance lens. This dual analytic lens focuses on how particular narrative performances are simultaneously shaped by the interview setting and the broader discursive context. The lens was fashioned by synthesising Butler’s theory of performativity with Taylor’s narrative-discursive method. This synthesis (1) allows for Butler’s notion of “performativity” to be supplemented with that of “performance”; (2) provides a concrete analytical strategy in the form of positioning analysis; and (3) draws attention to both the micro politics of the interview conversation and the operation of power on the macro level, including the possibility of making “gender trouble”. The findings of the study suggest that the participants experienced difficulty narrating about male involvement in parenthood decision-making, owing to the taken for granted nature of parenthood for heterosexual adults. This was evident in participants’ sidelining of issues of “deciding” and “planning” and their alternate construal of childbearing as a non-choice, which, significantly served to bolster hetero-patriarchal norms. A central rhetorical tool for accomplishing these purposes was found in the construction of the “sacralised” child. In discursively manoeuvring around the central problematic, the participants ultimately produced a “silence” in the data that repeats the one in the research literature.]]> Tue 15 Aug 2023 16:06:17 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:2982 Thu 13 May 2021 07:26:50 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:2964 Thu 13 May 2021 06:56:39 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3035 Thu 13 May 2021 02:44:55 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3096 Thu 13 May 2021 00:30:15 SAST ]]> https://vital.seals.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3016 Mon 05 Jun 2023 08:49:17 SAST ]]>