The politics of erasure: thinking critically about anonymity and confidentiality

Marx, Jacqueline; Macleod, Catriona I

Title: The politics of erasure: thinking critically about anonymity and confidentiality
Creator: Marx, Jacqueline
Creator: Macleod, Catriona I
Date Issued: 2015
Date: 2015
Type: text
Type: article
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/143827
Identifier: vital:38286
Identifier: https://ischp.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/ischp_2015_abstract_booklet.pdf
Description: Anonymity and confidentiality are prominent features in research ethics codes. In this paper we critically examine the ethical imperative to change or eradicate research participant’s names and the distinctive, individually identifying characteristics of their lives. Drawing on examples from a research ethics application for a project involving women who had extricated themselves from relationships in which they had experienced intimate partner violence, and an ethnographic case study of cross-dressing and drag, consideration is given to the multiple ways in which anonymity and confidentiality can be put to work, both promoting and undermining what it means to do ethical research. We argue that the requirement for anonymity and confidentiality cannot be assessed without taking into account historicity and the socio-political contexts in which a study and its participants are located. The paper concludes with some consideration of the implications of a situated ethics approach for institutional review board protocols.
Format: pdf
Language: English
Relation: International Society of Critical Health Psychology (ISCHP)
Relation: Marx, J. and Macleod, C., 2015. The politics of erasure: Thinking critically about anonymity and confidentiality. International Society of Critical Health Psychology (ISCHP). 9th Biennial Conference, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
Relation: International Society of Critical Health Psychology (ISCHP) volume 2015 number 0 2015
Rights: Publisher
Rights: Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Rhodes University Proatia Statement (https://www.ru.ac.za//governance/proatia/)

Hits: 716
Visitors: 810
Downloads: 116

Collections

Marx, Jacqueline (Ms)

Macleod, Catriona Ida (Distinguished Professor)

SDG 05. Gender Equality

RU Department of Psychology

SDG 10. Reduced Inequalities

RU DST/NRF SARChI for Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproductions Research (CSSR) Programme

SDG 03. Good Health and Well-Being

		Thumbnail	File	Description	Size	Format
View Details Download			SOURCE1	2015 International Society of Critical Health Psychology (ISCHP).pdf	765 KB	Adobe Acrobat PDF	View Details Download