Soil biota in a megadiverse country current knowledge and future research directions in South Africa
- Janion-Scheepers, Charlene, Measey, John, Braschler, Brigitte, Chown, Steven L, Coetzee, Louisee, Colville, Jonathan F, Dames, Joanna F, Davies, Andrew B, Davies, Sarah J, Davis, Adrian L V, Dippenaar-Schoeman, Ansi S, Duffy, Grant A, Fouries, Driekie, Griffiths, Charles, Haddad, Charles R, Hamer, Michelle, Herbert, David G, Hugo-Coetzee, Elizabeth A, Jacobs, Adriaanas, Jacobs, Karin, Jansen van Rensburg, Candice, Lamani, Siviwe, Lotz, Leon N, vdm Louw, Schalk, Lyle, Robin, Malan, Antoinette P, Marais, Mariette, Neethling, Jan-Andries, Nxele, Thembeka, Plisko, Danuta J, Prendini, Lorenzo, Rink, Ariella N, Swart, Antionette, Theron, Pieter, Truter, Mariette, Ueckermnn, Eddie, Uys, Vivienne M, Villet, Martin H, Willows-Munro, Sandy, Wilson, R U
- Authors: Janion-Scheepers, Charlene , Measey, John , Braschler, Brigitte , Chown, Steven L , Coetzee, Louisee , Colville, Jonathan F , Dames, Joanna F , Davies, Andrew B , Davies, Sarah J , Davis, Adrian L V , Dippenaar-Schoeman, Ansi S , Duffy, Grant A , Fouries, Driekie , Griffiths, Charles , Haddad, Charles R , Hamer, Michelle , Herbert, David G , Hugo-Coetzee, Elizabeth A , Jacobs, Adriaanas , Jacobs, Karin , Jansen van Rensburg, Candice , Lamani, Siviwe , Lotz, Leon N , vdm Louw, Schalk , Lyle, Robin , Malan, Antoinette P , Marais, Mariette , Neethling, Jan-Andries , Nxele, Thembeka , Plisko, Danuta J , Prendini, Lorenzo , Rink, Ariella N , Swart, Antionette , Theron, Pieter , Truter, Mariette , Ueckermnn, Eddie , Uys, Vivienne M , Villet, Martin H , Willows-Munro, Sandy , Wilson, R U
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/448682 , vital:74751 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.03.004
- Description: Soils are integral to agricultural productivity, biodiversity, and the maintenance of ecosystem services. However, soil ecosystem research depends on foundational biological knowledge that is often missing. In this review, we present a comprehensive, cross-taxa overview of the soil biota of South Africa. We discuss the literature and sampling methods used to assess soil biota, the available taxonomic expertise and main collections within South Africa, the availability of identification guides and online resources, and the status and distribution of described species. We include species lists for all South African soil biota and, for groups with sufficient distribution records, species richness maps. Despite South Africa being only 0.8% of the earth’s terrestrial area, it contains nearly 1.8% of the world’s described soil species (mean per taxon 3.64%, range 0.17–15%; n = 36 groups), with nematodes and earthworms showing a remarkable (6.4 and 7.7%) proportion of globally described diversity. Endemism is high for most groups, ranging from 33–92%. However, major knowledge gaps exist for most soil biota groups. While sampling has been relatively comprehensive in some areas for a few groups (particularly those with direct socioeconomic impacts), the Nama-Karoo, Northern Cape and Eastern Cape are poorly sampled. Natural soils in biodiversity hotspots, such as the Fynbos Biome, are also understudied. We argue that a more integrative approach to acquiring foundational knowledge in soil biodiversity is needed if applied soil research is to be effective in ensuring sustainable soil health. Considerable investment will be required to bring our understanding of the soil biodiversity in this megadiverse region to a level where the Millennium Development Goals can be reached.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
Soil biota in a megadiverse country current knowledge and future research directions in South Africa
- Authors: Janion-Scheepers, Charlene , Measey, John , Braschler, Brigitte , Chown, Steven L , Coetzee, Louisee , Colville, Jonathan F , Dames, Joanna F , Davies, Andrew B , Davies, Sarah J , Davis, Adrian L V , Dippenaar-Schoeman, Ansi S , Duffy, Grant A , Fouries, Driekie , Griffiths, Charles , Haddad, Charles R , Hamer, Michelle , Herbert, David G , Hugo-Coetzee, Elizabeth A , Jacobs, Adriaanas , Jacobs, Karin , Jansen van Rensburg, Candice , Lamani, Siviwe , Lotz, Leon N , vdm Louw, Schalk , Lyle, Robin , Malan, Antoinette P , Marais, Mariette , Neethling, Jan-Andries , Nxele, Thembeka , Plisko, Danuta J , Prendini, Lorenzo , Rink, Ariella N , Swart, Antionette , Theron, Pieter , Truter, Mariette , Ueckermnn, Eddie , Uys, Vivienne M , Villet, Martin H , Willows-Munro, Sandy , Wilson, R U
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/448682 , vital:74751 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.03.004
- Description: Soils are integral to agricultural productivity, biodiversity, and the maintenance of ecosystem services. However, soil ecosystem research depends on foundational biological knowledge that is often missing. In this review, we present a comprehensive, cross-taxa overview of the soil biota of South Africa. We discuss the literature and sampling methods used to assess soil biota, the available taxonomic expertise and main collections within South Africa, the availability of identification guides and online resources, and the status and distribution of described species. We include species lists for all South African soil biota and, for groups with sufficient distribution records, species richness maps. Despite South Africa being only 0.8% of the earth’s terrestrial area, it contains nearly 1.8% of the world’s described soil species (mean per taxon 3.64%, range 0.17–15%; n = 36 groups), with nematodes and earthworms showing a remarkable (6.4 and 7.7%) proportion of globally described diversity. Endemism is high for most groups, ranging from 33–92%. However, major knowledge gaps exist for most soil biota groups. While sampling has been relatively comprehensive in some areas for a few groups (particularly those with direct socioeconomic impacts), the Nama-Karoo, Northern Cape and Eastern Cape are poorly sampled. Natural soils in biodiversity hotspots, such as the Fynbos Biome, are also understudied. We argue that a more integrative approach to acquiring foundational knowledge in soil biodiversity is needed if applied soil research is to be effective in ensuring sustainable soil health. Considerable investment will be required to bring our understanding of the soil biodiversity in this megadiverse region to a level where the Millennium Development Goals can be reached.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
South African research in the Southern Ocean: New opportunities but serious challenges
- Treasure, Anne M, Moloney, Coleen, Bester, Marthán N, Findlay, Ken P, Best, Peter B, Cowan, Don A, De Bruyn, P J Nico, Dorrington, Rosemary A, Fagereng, Ake, Froneman, P William, Grantham, Geoff H, Hunt, Brian P V, Meiklejohn, Ian, Pakhomov, Evgeny A, Roychoudhury, Alakendra N, Ryan, Peter G, Smith, Valdon R, Chown, Steven L, Ansorge, Isabelle J
- Authors: Treasure, Anne M , Moloney, Coleen , Bester, Marthán N , Findlay, Ken P , Best, Peter B , Cowan, Don A , De Bruyn, P J Nico , Dorrington, Rosemary A , Fagereng, Ake , Froneman, P William , Grantham, Geoff H , Hunt, Brian P V , Meiklejohn, Ian , Pakhomov, Evgeny A , Roychoudhury, Alakendra N , Ryan, Peter G , Smith, Valdon R , Chown, Steven L , Ansorge, Isabelle J
- Date: 2013
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/480584 , vital:78457 , https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC133146
- Description: South Africa has a long track record in Southern Ocean and Antarctic research and has recently invested considerable funds in acquiring new infrastructure for ongoing support of this research. This infrastructure includes a new base at Marion Island and a purpose-built ice capable research vessel, which greatly expand research opportunities. Despite this investment, South Africa's standing as a participant in this critical field is threatened by confusion, lack of funding, lack of consultation and lack of transparency. The research endeavour is presently bedevilled by political manoeuvring among groups with divergent interests that too often have little to do with science, while past and present contributors of research are excluded from discussions that aim to formulate research strategy. This state of affairs is detrimental to the country's aims of developing a leadership role in climate change and Antarctic research and squanders both financial and human capital.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
- Authors: Treasure, Anne M , Moloney, Coleen , Bester, Marthán N , Findlay, Ken P , Best, Peter B , Cowan, Don A , De Bruyn, P J Nico , Dorrington, Rosemary A , Fagereng, Ake , Froneman, P William , Grantham, Geoff H , Hunt, Brian P V , Meiklejohn, Ian , Pakhomov, Evgeny A , Roychoudhury, Alakendra N , Ryan, Peter G , Smith, Valdon R , Chown, Steven L , Ansorge, Isabelle J
- Date: 2013
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/480584 , vital:78457 , https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC133146
- Description: South Africa has a long track record in Southern Ocean and Antarctic research and has recently invested considerable funds in acquiring new infrastructure for ongoing support of this research. This infrastructure includes a new base at Marion Island and a purpose-built ice capable research vessel, which greatly expand research opportunities. Despite this investment, South Africa's standing as a participant in this critical field is threatened by confusion, lack of funding, lack of consultation and lack of transparency. The research endeavour is presently bedevilled by political manoeuvring among groups with divergent interests that too often have little to do with science, while past and present contributors of research are excluded from discussions that aim to formulate research strategy. This state of affairs is detrimental to the country's aims of developing a leadership role in climate change and Antarctic research and squanders both financial and human capital.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
Conserving pattern and process in the Southern Ocean: designing a Marine Protected Area for the Prince Edward Islands
- Lombard, Amanda T, Reyers, B, Schonegevel, L Y, Cooper, J, Smith-Adao, L B, Nel, D C, Froneman, P William, Ansorge, Isabelle J, Bester, Marthán N, Tosh, C A, Strauss, T, Akkers, T, Gon, Ofer, Leslie, Rob W, Chown, Steven L
- Authors: Lombard, Amanda T , Reyers, B , Schonegevel, L Y , Cooper, J , Smith-Adao, L B , Nel, D C , Froneman, P William , Ansorge, Isabelle J , Bester, Marthán N , Tosh, C A , Strauss, T , Akkers, T , Gon, Ofer , Leslie, Rob W , Chown, Steven L
- Date: 2007
- Language: English
- Type: Article
- Identifier: vital:6881 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1011637
- Description: South Africa is currently proclaiming a Marine Protected Area (MPA) in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of its sub-Antarctic Prince Edward Islands. The objectives of the MPA are to: 1) contribute to a national and global representative system of MPAs, 2) serve as a scientific reference point to inform future management, 3) contribute to the recovery of the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides), and 4) reduce the bird bycatch of the toothfish fishery, particularly of albatrosses and petrels. This study employs systematic conservation planning methods to delineate a MPA within the EEZ that will conserve biodiversity patterns and processes within sensible management boundaries, while minimizing conflict with the legal toothfish fishery. After collating all available distributional data on species, benthic habitats and ecosystem processes, we used C-Plan software to delineate a MPA with three management zones: four IUCN Category Ia reserves (13% of EEZ); two Conservation Zones (21% of EEZ); and three Category IV reserves (remainder of EEZ). Compromises between conservation target achievement and the area required by the MPA are apparent in the final reserve design. The proposed MPA boundaries are expected to change over time as new data become available and as impacts of climate change become more evident.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2007
- Authors: Lombard, Amanda T , Reyers, B , Schonegevel, L Y , Cooper, J , Smith-Adao, L B , Nel, D C , Froneman, P William , Ansorge, Isabelle J , Bester, Marthán N , Tosh, C A , Strauss, T , Akkers, T , Gon, Ofer , Leslie, Rob W , Chown, Steven L
- Date: 2007
- Language: English
- Type: Article
- Identifier: vital:6881 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1011637
- Description: South Africa is currently proclaiming a Marine Protected Area (MPA) in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of its sub-Antarctic Prince Edward Islands. The objectives of the MPA are to: 1) contribute to a national and global representative system of MPAs, 2) serve as a scientific reference point to inform future management, 3) contribute to the recovery of the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides), and 4) reduce the bird bycatch of the toothfish fishery, particularly of albatrosses and petrels. This study employs systematic conservation planning methods to delineate a MPA within the EEZ that will conserve biodiversity patterns and processes within sensible management boundaries, while minimizing conflict with the legal toothfish fishery. After collating all available distributional data on species, benthic habitats and ecosystem processes, we used C-Plan software to delineate a MPA with three management zones: four IUCN Category Ia reserves (13% of EEZ); two Conservation Zones (21% of EEZ); and three Category IV reserves (remainder of EEZ). Compromises between conservation target achievement and the area required by the MPA are apparent in the final reserve design. The proposed MPA boundaries are expected to change over time as new data become available and as impacts of climate change become more evident.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2007
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »