- Title
- Dancing with the devil: formative peer assessment and academic performance
- Creator
- Mostert, Markus
- Creator
- Snowball, Jeanette D
- Date Issued
- 2013
- Date
- 2013
- Type
- text
- Type
- article
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10962/69301
- Identifier
- vital:29483
- Identifier
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.705262
- Description
- Peer assessment can be important in developing active and independent learners, as well as providing more and faster feedback in large classes, compared to marking done by tutors. In addition, the evaluative, critical stance required by students in order to assess their peers' work encourages the development of higher-order cognitive skills. Changing roles from being assessed to being an assessor can also improve students' ability to judge and improve on their own work. However, peer assessment does have potential problems and there is some debate as to the appropriate academic level at which to implement it, the kinds of feedback that are given and the ways in which students respond. In addition, there is little evidence that peer assessment has an impact on academic performance. This research reports the results of an online peer assessment exercise for a macroeconomics essay conducted in a large Economics 1 class at Rhodes University. Of the 800 students, about half participated in the peer assessment exercise. Data were collected from students via a formal course evaluation. In addition, a sample of 50 essays was evaluated in terms of the relationship between peer marks and final (tutor) marks received and the impact that peer assessment had on the quality of the final essay submitted. An Ordinary Least Squares regression was used to investigate the impact of peer assessment participation on marks. Results showed that peer marks tended to ‘bunch’ in the 60–68% range, indicating the reluctance of peers to give very high or low marks. In general, peers gave more useful feedback on technical aspects, such as presentation and referencing (which were also the categories in which students most often made improvements), than on content. Regression analysis showed that peer assessment participation was not a significant determinant of final essay mark, but that economics ability and English language proficiency were.
- Format
- 14 pages
- Format
- Language
- English
- Relation
- Higher Education Research and Development
- Relation
- Snowball, J.D. and Mostert, M., 2013. Dancing with the devil: formative peer assessment and academic performance. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(4), pp.646-659.
- Relation
- Higher Education Research and Development volume 32 number 4 646 659 June 2013 1469-8366
- Rights
- Taylor and Francis
- Rights
- Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Taylor and Francis Online Open Select Journals statement (https://www.tandfonline.com/openaccess/openselect)
- Hits: 1118
- Visitors: 1214
- Downloads: 121
Collections
Snowball, Jeanette D (Prof)
Mostert, Markus (Mr)
RU Department of Economics and Economic History
RU Centre for Higher Education Research, Teaching and Learning (CHERTL)
RU Department of Education
SDG 04. Quality Education
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | SOURCE1 | JPEG Image | 123 KB | JPEG Image | View Details Download |