Nectar feeding by weavers (Ploceidae) and their role as pollinators
- Authors: Craig, Adrian J F K
- Date: 2014
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/449445 , vital:74822 , https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2014.900828
- Description: Reviews of nectar-feeding by birds initially focused on specialist nectarivores and ignored the role that more generalist feeders may play in plant pollination. Recent work has emphasised the range of bird species, both specialist and opportunistic, that feed on nectar. In this review, I collate published information on nectar-feeding by weavers, highlight known weaver–plant relationships, and suggest areas for future research. There are published records of nectar feeding for Plocepasser superciliosus, Amblyospiza albifrons, Anaplectes rubriceps, two Quelea spp., four Euplectes spp., all six Foudia spp., two Malimbus spp. and 22 Ploceus spp. To date, there have been no unambiguous reports of other genera feeding on nectar. The role of Ploceus species as pollinators of Strelitzia reginae, proposed by ornithologists decades ago, has recently been confirmed by botanists. Current studies of Aloe species in South Africa suggest that opportunistic avian nectarivores such as ploceids may be the chief pollinators of bird-pollinated plants in this genus, whereas specialist nectar feeders (sunbirds) may be ‘nectar robbers’ in many cases. Particularly for winter-flowering plants, weaver species are potential pollinators, but exclusion experiments are needed to establish their role, while the dietary importance of nectar, and its impact on the birds’ physiology, has not been critically studied.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2014
- Authors: Craig, Adrian J F K
- Date: 2014
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/449445 , vital:74822 , https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2014.900828
- Description: Reviews of nectar-feeding by birds initially focused on specialist nectarivores and ignored the role that more generalist feeders may play in plant pollination. Recent work has emphasised the range of bird species, both specialist and opportunistic, that feed on nectar. In this review, I collate published information on nectar-feeding by weavers, highlight known weaver–plant relationships, and suggest areas for future research. There are published records of nectar feeding for Plocepasser superciliosus, Amblyospiza albifrons, Anaplectes rubriceps, two Quelea spp., four Euplectes spp., all six Foudia spp., two Malimbus spp. and 22 Ploceus spp. To date, there have been no unambiguous reports of other genera feeding on nectar. The role of Ploceus species as pollinators of Strelitzia reginae, proposed by ornithologists decades ago, has recently been confirmed by botanists. Current studies of Aloe species in South Africa suggest that opportunistic avian nectarivores such as ploceids may be the chief pollinators of bird-pollinated plants in this genus, whereas specialist nectar feeders (sunbirds) may be ‘nectar robbers’ in many cases. Particularly for winter-flowering plants, weaver species are potential pollinators, but exclusion experiments are needed to establish their role, while the dietary importance of nectar, and its impact on the birds’ physiology, has not been critically studied.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2014
Primary wing-moult and site fidelity in South African mousebirds (Coliidae)
- Craig, Adrian J F K, Bonnevie, Bo T, Hulley, Patrick E, Underhill, George D
- Authors: Craig, Adrian J F K , Bonnevie, Bo T , Hulley, Patrick E , Underhill, George D
- Date: 2014
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/449474 , vital:74824 , https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2014.931310
- Description: Based on large samples of birds mist-netted in the Eastern Cape and the Western Cape, moult of the primary remiges in both Speckled Mousebirds Colius striatus and Red-faced Mousebirds Urocolius indicus occurred throughout the year with no regional or seasonal patterns evident. The same picture emerged for the White-backed Mousebird Colius colius in the Western Cape. This aseasonality of wing-moult for all three species in South Africa was further supported by the full data set of moult records available in the Safring database. We were thus unable to use the Underhill–Zucchini model to estimate the moult parameters for these species, but an extended moult period seems likely. Recapture data for the Eastern Cape strongly suggest that Speckled Mousebirds are resident or revisit sites frequently, whereas this is not the case for Red-faced Mousebirds.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2014
- Authors: Craig, Adrian J F K , Bonnevie, Bo T , Hulley, Patrick E , Underhill, George D
- Date: 2014
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/449474 , vital:74824 , https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2014.931310
- Description: Based on large samples of birds mist-netted in the Eastern Cape and the Western Cape, moult of the primary remiges in both Speckled Mousebirds Colius striatus and Red-faced Mousebirds Urocolius indicus occurred throughout the year with no regional or seasonal patterns evident. The same picture emerged for the White-backed Mousebird Colius colius in the Western Cape. This aseasonality of wing-moult for all three species in South Africa was further supported by the full data set of moult records available in the Safring database. We were thus unable to use the Underhill–Zucchini model to estimate the moult parameters for these species, but an extended moult period seems likely. Recapture data for the Eastern Cape strongly suggest that Speckled Mousebirds are resident or revisit sites frequently, whereas this is not the case for Red-faced Mousebirds.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2014
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »