Normative and institutional approaches to the protection of property rights of IDPs in Kenya's Rift Valley Province
- Authors: Juma, Laurence
- Date: 2012
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/127464 , vital:36014 , https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2012.0033
- Description: The post-election violence of 2008 which displaced about 600,000 people in six out of the eight provinces of Kenya1 has brought the plight of the internally displaced persons (IDPs) to the forefront of the national debate on politics and law. Transcending this debate is the sobering reality that inasmuch as the events of 2008 were catastrophic, they were a mere replay of the ethnically engineered political violence that Kenyans have had to endure before and after every major election since 1990.2
- Full Text: false
- Date Issued: 2012
- Authors: Juma, Laurence
- Date: 2012
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/127464 , vital:36014 , https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2012.0033
- Description: The post-election violence of 2008 which displaced about 600,000 people in six out of the eight provinces of Kenya1 has brought the plight of the internally displaced persons (IDPs) to the forefront of the national debate on politics and law. Transcending this debate is the sobering reality that inasmuch as the events of 2008 were catastrophic, they were a mere replay of the ethnically engineered political violence that Kenyans have had to endure before and after every major election since 1990.2
- Full Text: false
- Date Issued: 2012
The problems of proving actual or apparent bias: an analysis of contemporary developments in South Africa
- Okpaluba, Chuks, Juma, Laurence
- Authors: Okpaluba, Chuks , Juma, Laurence
- Date: 2011
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/127498 , vital:36017 , https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i7a2616
- Description: This article takes a critical look at the divergent approaches of courts in constructing the meaning of actual and apparent bias in adjudicative contexts. It argues that while proving actual bias on the part of an adjudicator may not always be easy and parties often revert to apprehended bias, an allegation of bias in any adjudication process is a matter that courts take very seriously. This notwithstanding, the courts have failed to consistently demarcate the necessary elements and threshold of proof that complainants must overcome to secure a successful challenge of decisions based on adjudicative impartiality. Upon critical evaluation of the decisions on the subject so far rendered, this article suggests that the pattern which has seemingly emerged is that which weighs the allegations of bias against the presumption of impartiality and the requirements of the double reasonableness test.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2011
- Authors: Okpaluba, Chuks , Juma, Laurence
- Date: 2011
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/127498 , vital:36017 , https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i7a2616
- Description: This article takes a critical look at the divergent approaches of courts in constructing the meaning of actual and apparent bias in adjudicative contexts. It argues that while proving actual bias on the part of an adjudicator may not always be easy and parties often revert to apprehended bias, an allegation of bias in any adjudication process is a matter that courts take very seriously. This notwithstanding, the courts have failed to consistently demarcate the necessary elements and threshold of proof that complainants must overcome to secure a successful challenge of decisions based on adjudicative impartiality. Upon critical evaluation of the decisions on the subject so far rendered, this article suggests that the pattern which has seemingly emerged is that which weighs the allegations of bias against the presumption of impartiality and the requirements of the double reasonableness test.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2011
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »