The effect of a guided enquiry based learning approach on mechanical engineering students' understanding of thermodynamics
- Authors: Louw, Christoffel
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Thermodynamics -- Mechanical engineering -- Students
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , D Ed
- Identifier: vital:18474 , http://hdl.handle.net/11260/d1011523
- Description: Personal experiences of almost 17 years as an academic in engineering education in South Africa indicate that with the current teaching methods which are in use, course outcomes as required by the South African Qualification Authority (SAQA) are not achieved in learning Thermodynamics 2 (MTHE 2). The purpose of this research was to investigate alternative methods of teaching and learning MTHE 2 which would assist to improve the students’ academic performance. The population for this research was students registered for National Diploma Mechanical Engineering and the accessible population was 40 students registered for MTHE 2 from Walter Sisulu University, Chiselhurst campus. Out of these 40 students, 20 voluntarily agreed to be the sample. The theoretical framework for this study was social constructivism. Social constructivism states that learning is an active process and the process of knowledge construction occurs in a socio-cultural context where the student and environment actively interact. The student involves himself/herself and does neither remain nor be allowed to remain just as a passive observer. This was an action research where students were exposed to Guided Enquiry Based Learning (GEBL) in groups. From a social constructivists approach to learning, GEBL was used to engage students in social groups during the teaching-learning process with specific focus on selected academic discipline. All ethical considerations applicable to a study of the present nature were adhered to and in addition, signed informed consent forms were obtained from participants prior to the study. Students were given an introduction to the concepts and principles as per the pre-set syllabus for MTHE 2 and this was followed by problem solving sessions in which they were divided into four groups of five students each. The students were given a guided enquiry- and work-based example with an additional list of questions on each module of the syllabus. They had to select the most relevant questions from the list to analyse and develop a solution for each problem. The lecturers’ role was that of a facilitator who assisted each group with problems which the group encountered. This approach engaged students more actively in the learning process and placed more responsibility on them for their own progress in learning. This process also created an atmosphere for interaction with peers and assisted them to develop interpersonal and group communication skills. Key performance indicators were developed to measure the extent to which these outcomes were achieved. The researcher made use of an instrument structured in terms of Likert-type scale in order to objectively assess the extent of achievement. Data collected from the pilot study done in 2009 indicated that GEBL improved the students’ understanding of course content and problem analysis. Quantitative data were collected by means of standard assessment i.e. semester tests, an oral test, final examination and a KPI instrument. The KPIs were formulated to measure the extent to which the outcomes for MTHE 2 had been achieved. Qualitative data were collected through 30-minute interviews, using an open-ended interview schedule, with each member of the sample. The interviews were done by a person who qualified both as an ‘insider and outsider’ in order to minimize the risk of bias and to maintain rigour in the research. In order to qualify as an ‘insider and outsider’, one ought to be as an insider: (a) from the same ethnic group, (b) qualified in Mechanical Engineering with Thermodynamics as a major course, (c) had no power disposition e.g. a former student or a laboratory assistant (excluding staff members within the mechanical engineering department) and as an outsider, one who was not part of the GEBL process. The quantitative scores from the assessments were analysed with Predictive Analysis Software (PASW) to determine the extent to which interventions had assisted student performance. The qualitative data from the interviews were analysed with N-Vivo to reveal the impact of GEBL on student learning and understanding of MTHE 2. The results indicated that with GEBL, the students’ overall scores improved from the first assessment score of 46% written on half of the first module to the final assessment score of 55% written on all seven modules. Students could handle larger volumes of work and still obtain a higher percentage. GEBL assisted students’ in recalling factual MTHE 2 concepts, understanding of MTHE 2 concepts, principles and applications. GEBL also enhanced students’ ability to communicate procedures and processes related to MTHE 2. KPIs formulated to measure the extent to which the outcomes were met in terms of student achievement indicated a 57% achievement thereof. The KPIs developed gave a percentage achievement of the specified outcomes for MTHE 2 with GEBL. Theses KPIs can be used in future to measure the effectiveness of different teaching and learning methods in terms of achieving the outcomes. It is therefore recommended that GEBL be introduced into other engineering courses also to assist students in understanding course content and in achieving the course outcomes.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2012
- Authors: Louw, Christoffel
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Thermodynamics -- Mechanical engineering -- Students
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , D Ed
- Identifier: vital:18474 , http://hdl.handle.net/11260/d1011523
- Description: Personal experiences of almost 17 years as an academic in engineering education in South Africa indicate that with the current teaching methods which are in use, course outcomes as required by the South African Qualification Authority (SAQA) are not achieved in learning Thermodynamics 2 (MTHE 2). The purpose of this research was to investigate alternative methods of teaching and learning MTHE 2 which would assist to improve the students’ academic performance. The population for this research was students registered for National Diploma Mechanical Engineering and the accessible population was 40 students registered for MTHE 2 from Walter Sisulu University, Chiselhurst campus. Out of these 40 students, 20 voluntarily agreed to be the sample. The theoretical framework for this study was social constructivism. Social constructivism states that learning is an active process and the process of knowledge construction occurs in a socio-cultural context where the student and environment actively interact. The student involves himself/herself and does neither remain nor be allowed to remain just as a passive observer. This was an action research where students were exposed to Guided Enquiry Based Learning (GEBL) in groups. From a social constructivists approach to learning, GEBL was used to engage students in social groups during the teaching-learning process with specific focus on selected academic discipline. All ethical considerations applicable to a study of the present nature were adhered to and in addition, signed informed consent forms were obtained from participants prior to the study. Students were given an introduction to the concepts and principles as per the pre-set syllabus for MTHE 2 and this was followed by problem solving sessions in which they were divided into four groups of five students each. The students were given a guided enquiry- and work-based example with an additional list of questions on each module of the syllabus. They had to select the most relevant questions from the list to analyse and develop a solution for each problem. The lecturers’ role was that of a facilitator who assisted each group with problems which the group encountered. This approach engaged students more actively in the learning process and placed more responsibility on them for their own progress in learning. This process also created an atmosphere for interaction with peers and assisted them to develop interpersonal and group communication skills. Key performance indicators were developed to measure the extent to which these outcomes were achieved. The researcher made use of an instrument structured in terms of Likert-type scale in order to objectively assess the extent of achievement. Data collected from the pilot study done in 2009 indicated that GEBL improved the students’ understanding of course content and problem analysis. Quantitative data were collected by means of standard assessment i.e. semester tests, an oral test, final examination and a KPI instrument. The KPIs were formulated to measure the extent to which the outcomes for MTHE 2 had been achieved. Qualitative data were collected through 30-minute interviews, using an open-ended interview schedule, with each member of the sample. The interviews were done by a person who qualified both as an ‘insider and outsider’ in order to minimize the risk of bias and to maintain rigour in the research. In order to qualify as an ‘insider and outsider’, one ought to be as an insider: (a) from the same ethnic group, (b) qualified in Mechanical Engineering with Thermodynamics as a major course, (c) had no power disposition e.g. a former student or a laboratory assistant (excluding staff members within the mechanical engineering department) and as an outsider, one who was not part of the GEBL process. The quantitative scores from the assessments were analysed with Predictive Analysis Software (PASW) to determine the extent to which interventions had assisted student performance. The qualitative data from the interviews were analysed with N-Vivo to reveal the impact of GEBL on student learning and understanding of MTHE 2. The results indicated that with GEBL, the students’ overall scores improved from the first assessment score of 46% written on half of the first module to the final assessment score of 55% written on all seven modules. Students could handle larger volumes of work and still obtain a higher percentage. GEBL assisted students’ in recalling factual MTHE 2 concepts, understanding of MTHE 2 concepts, principles and applications. GEBL also enhanced students’ ability to communicate procedures and processes related to MTHE 2. KPIs formulated to measure the extent to which the outcomes were met in terms of student achievement indicated a 57% achievement thereof. The KPIs developed gave a percentage achievement of the specified outcomes for MTHE 2 with GEBL. Theses KPIs can be used in future to measure the effectiveness of different teaching and learning methods in terms of achieving the outcomes. It is therefore recommended that GEBL be introduced into other engineering courses also to assist students in understanding course content and in achieving the course outcomes.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2012
The evaluation of an instructional framework using the Van Hiele levels for learning and teaching geometry: a study in five rural senior secondary schools
- Alex, Jogymol Kalariparampil
- Authors: Alex, Jogymol Kalariparampil
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Teaching and learning -- Geometry -- Education (Secondary)
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , D Ed
- Identifier: vital:18470 , http://hdl.handle.net/11260/d1011278
- Description: The Constitution (1996) of the Republic of South Africa forms the basis for social transformation in our new society. The Constitution (Act 108 of 1996) and the amendments that followed provided a basis for curriculum transformation and development in South Africa. The Department of Education introduced the present curriculum known as the National Curriculum Statement, which is modern and internationally benchmarked, in grade 10 in 2006. It required the learners to do seven subjects in grades 10 to 12 of which mathematics or mathematical literacy was prescribed as compulsory subjects. To attain social transformation, the South African Government attached a great deal of importance to the learning and teaching of mathematics and sciences in the South African schools. This study was undertaken in an effort to improve the understanding of geometry and, consequently, the performance and achievement of senior secondary school learners in geometry. The study was inspired by the van Hiele theory. The study made use of the different levels of the van Hiele theory for the development of an instructional framework for geometry in senior secondary schools. The research was conducted in a previously disadvantaged area in South Africa. Given the setting of this study and the wider application of it, the use of ‘hands-on’ and practical approach to use manipulatives and worksheets to improve the geometric understanding was tried and tested in this study. The assumption was that such experiences would make the learning of geometry more relevant and enjoyable for learners from limited financial and underprivileged circumstances. A quasi-experimental design was chosen. A total of 359 learners from five purposively selected schools in Mthatha district in the Eastern Cape Province participated in this study. Qualitative data through interviews were gathered. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS Version 19 and Microsoft Excel. Findings indicated that there was a notable improvement in the performance of learners who were taught by the application of the van Hiele theory. The results revealed that most of the learners were not ready for the application of deductive principles of geometry in terms of formal proof in senior secondary school geometry. Based on the results, some recommendations are made to enhance the teaching and learning of geometry in senior secondary schools.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2012
- Authors: Alex, Jogymol Kalariparampil
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Teaching and learning -- Geometry -- Education (Secondary)
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , D Ed
- Identifier: vital:18470 , http://hdl.handle.net/11260/d1011278
- Description: The Constitution (1996) of the Republic of South Africa forms the basis for social transformation in our new society. The Constitution (Act 108 of 1996) and the amendments that followed provided a basis for curriculum transformation and development in South Africa. The Department of Education introduced the present curriculum known as the National Curriculum Statement, which is modern and internationally benchmarked, in grade 10 in 2006. It required the learners to do seven subjects in grades 10 to 12 of which mathematics or mathematical literacy was prescribed as compulsory subjects. To attain social transformation, the South African Government attached a great deal of importance to the learning and teaching of mathematics and sciences in the South African schools. This study was undertaken in an effort to improve the understanding of geometry and, consequently, the performance and achievement of senior secondary school learners in geometry. The study was inspired by the van Hiele theory. The study made use of the different levels of the van Hiele theory for the development of an instructional framework for geometry in senior secondary schools. The research was conducted in a previously disadvantaged area in South Africa. Given the setting of this study and the wider application of it, the use of ‘hands-on’ and practical approach to use manipulatives and worksheets to improve the geometric understanding was tried and tested in this study. The assumption was that such experiences would make the learning of geometry more relevant and enjoyable for learners from limited financial and underprivileged circumstances. A quasi-experimental design was chosen. A total of 359 learners from five purposively selected schools in Mthatha district in the Eastern Cape Province participated in this study. Qualitative data through interviews were gathered. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS Version 19 and Microsoft Excel. Findings indicated that there was a notable improvement in the performance of learners who were taught by the application of the van Hiele theory. The results revealed that most of the learners were not ready for the application of deductive principles of geometry in terms of formal proof in senior secondary school geometry. Based on the results, some recommendations are made to enhance the teaching and learning of geometry in senior secondary schools.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2012
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »