Justifications and limitations of affirmative action
- Authors: Weinand, Lorentia Leana
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Affirmative action programs -- South Africa , Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/44077 , vital:37105
- Description: The main aim of this thesis is to establish whether affirmative action is justified and to consider the limitations imposed thereon. Regard had to be made to the past position, as affirmative action emanated from the apartheid era. This paper provides for an extensive discussion of what affirmative action entails and compares the past position of unfair discrimination towards the current position of affirmative action. It is important to have regard to the Constitution, legislation and case law relating to the application of affirmative action. Within this paper reference to the Constitution, LRA, EEA, case law, academic writings and journal articles is made in order to evaluate on what basis affirmative action is founded, justified and limited. The approach used in terms of substantive equality based on the Van Heerden1 and Harksen v Lane2 judgments. Provision is made as to whom affirmative action applies to. The process of implementation of affirmative action is visited with a view to give guidance on how affirmative action should be implemented, what the short comings are in the public sector with the implementation process and to provide guidelines to achieve a positive and effective affirmative action in South Africa Because certain people regard affirmative action as reverse discrimination, the contrary had to be analysed by way of legislation and authority from case law in order to provide for the correct position. It would become apparent from this paper that affirmative action does not only apply to designated employees, after the Van Heerden Judgment the courts have developed their approach in a number of authorities for example in Alexandre v Provincial administration of the Western Cape Department of Health3. India makes use of affirmative action that is in some instances similar to the South African approach. For a distinct reason I have chosen a comparison between India and South Africa. The reason is that, each individual’s personal circumstances that are to benefit from affirmative action have to be assessed before affirmative action applies to them. Further that I do not agree with the fact that a group as a whole should benefit, therefore recommendations have been made.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Mechanisms for implementing affirmative action
- Authors: Nongogo, Nqabisa Thandazile
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Affirmative action programs -- South Africa , Minorities -- Employment -- South Africa , Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/33475 , vital:32878
- Description: The aim of this study was to analyse the effective implementation of affirmative action. In South Africa. Affirmative action is seen as a means of correcting historical injustices and levelling the playing fields to enable all South Africans to gain equal access to opportunities from which they were previously restricted. This study observed that even though South Africa is now governed by a new democratic order historical workplace inequalities exists which still need to be addressed. Further it was noted that not only compelled to redress inequalities by the Constitution, the South African government was motivated by the ILO to enact laws that would prohibit discrimination and promote the economic advancement of the majority. Therefore, in an effort to narrow the gap between previously advantaged and disadvantaged individuals, the government passed a series of employment laws mandating, amongst other things, affirmative action. By doing so the South African government sought to ensure that all employers are compelled to take positive steps to redress disadvantage and inequality. Be that as it may, the study revealed that affirmative action is theoretically justifiable and has an important role in the achievement of equal opportunities and equality of outcome but in practice, various problems exist. Generally, the study reveals that notwithstanding the legislative framework of affirmative action in South Africa, inequalities continues to exist in employment, a clear signal of inadequate implementation of affirmative action. The study reveals that black people, women and unable persons are identified as primary victims of workplace inequalities. Continuity of work inequalities are statistically portrayed graphically in this year’s (2017) Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS) conducted and published by Statistics South Africa on the Economically Active Population (EAP) still indicates no confidence to implementation of affirmative action measures nationwide. Reviews of implementation of affirmative action, recruitment strategies, retrenchment plans are strongly proposed to combat controversies and challenges surrounding the implementation of affirmative action. A sunset clause is highly recommended to projectize affirmative action. Similarly, with determined advocacy for affirmative action, the study anticipates progressive equality and sustainable justice in South African employment in the immediate future. Chapter five of this study recommends remedial measures to address the challenges and impediments for effective implementation of affirmative action.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
An evaluation of affirmative action in public sector
- Authors: Myoli, Vuyiseka Marly
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Human rights -- South Africa , Affirmative action programs -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/14190 , vital:27443
- Description: The South African public service has been undergoing fundamental transformation since 1994. The new government has had to build a democratic, inclusive and responsive public sector to the extent that the last two decades have witnessed the most dramatic shifts in public reform. After 1994, the public sector had to be transformed so that it could be representative of the nation’s racial composition, caters for the needs of all citizens irrespective of their racial, ethnic, gender, sexual persuasion and orientation. The government agenda of reconstructing and developing a democratic state depends on the willingness, capabilities and patriotism of the public service. As part of its transformation agenda, the government had to introduce policies that were focusing on promoting affirmative action and employment equity. Through this policy and other related employment equity measures, the South African public sector had to be transformed in terms of racial and gender representivity. This study assesses and evaluates whether the policies and legislation that were geared towards the transformation and democratization of public sector have yielded positive or negative results. By way of a literature review and comparative analysis, this study examines the objectives of affirmative action and analyses the approaches that have been taken since the adoption of this policy in the workplace. It looks at public sector and argues that there are still flaws relating to the implementation of affirmative action in public sector. The extent to which affirmative action programs attempt to implement affirmative action differs if South Africa and the United States of America can be taken as examples. The study considers some of the challenges faced by the new South African government in transforming public sector and interrogates the courts’ application and interpretation of affirmative action legislation. It concludes with recommendations that could be put in place in order to position affirmative action policies in line with the objectives of the South African Constitution, labour laws and American approach where the policy was adopted from.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Gender-based affirmative action in the appointment of High Court judges
- Authors: Van Heerden, Anneli
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Affirmative action programs -- South Africa , Women judges Sex discrimination against women -- Employment -- South Africa Women -- Employment -- Law and legislation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/21263 , vital:29468
- Description: The legitimacy of the judiciary is dependent on the racial and gender diversity of the courts. As a result of the oppressive policies imposed by the apartheid government, the High Court judiciary in 1994 was composed almost exclusively of white men. Judges were appointed at the behest of the executive arm of government and political considerations undoubtedly played a role in the selection process. As a result, the integrity of the judiciary was severely compromised in that the composition was entirely unrepresentative of the population it served, and they were appointed in order to further the strict racial policies of the apartheid government. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa came into being through multi-party negotiations and is to form the basis of a complete transformation of the South African society. In a clear move away from the judicial appointments procedure of the past, the Constitution specifies that judges are to be selected by the Judicial Services Commission which is an independent body composed of members from all three branches of the government. In its selection, the JSC is guided by section 174(2) of the Constitution which requires that the racial and gender demographics of the judiciary must be considered when judges are appointed so as to make the bench broadly reflective of the South Africa population. Systemic discrimination of the past denied women the opportunity to gain the necessary knowledge and experience to be eligible for appointment to the bench. Special measures are therefore needed to advance women’s career path to the judiciary. In 2010, the Judicial Services Commission adopted selection criteria to be considered when shortlisting and selecting candidates to be recommended to the President for judicial appointment. Included in these criteria is the consideration of symbolism and potential. Special measures to advance persons who were previously disadvantaged by discriminatory practices are permissible in terms of section 9(2) of the Constitution. It recognises that true substantive equality will not be achieved without special measures aimed at remedying to disadvantage still felt by many people in South Africa, including women. The imposition of such measures does, however, have limitations. In the judiciary, specifically, demographic considerations can not be the primary consideration when judges are appointed. This could lead to a judiciary that is incapable to dispense justice to the population it serves because it does not have the required skill, knowledge and experience. On the other hand, if judges are appointed solely on technical merit, the judiciary is likely to remain male-dominated. The JSC therefore has to carefully balance the need for demographic transformation of the judiciary with the need to appoint technically competent judges. In Minister of Finance v van Heerden, the Constitutional Court laid down three requirements which remedial measures must meet in order to pass constitutional muster. Firstly, the beneficiaries targeted by the remedial measure must be persons who have been discriminated against in the past. Secondly, it must be designed to protect or advance previously disadvantaged persons. Lastly, the remedial measures must promote the achievement of equality in the long term. Once a measures meets all three of these requirements, it is not considered to be unfair discrimination against previously advantaged persons who do not stand to benefit from the measure in question. To safeguard the independence of the judiciary, judges are not considered to be employees of the state. This means that the provisions contained in labour legislation which requires the adoption of a formal employment equity plan when imposing affirmative action measures is not directly applicable to the appointment of judges. The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act envisages the adoption of equality plans in all spheres not governed by labour legislation. These provisions are, however, not yet in force. As a result, there is no legislation that requires the Judicial Services Commission to adopt a formal affirmative action policy, and appointments made to address the gender imbalances on the judiciary are made on an ad hoc basis which runs counter to the test formulated in van Heerden. A related problem is that the Judicial Services Commission has not given sufficient content on the criteria needed for judicial appointment. For instance, even though the Judicial Services Commission does consider the technical competence, it has not published any guidance as to what is considered to be the minimum threshold of formal qualifications or experience needed to be appointed to judicial office. This has led many people to speculate that certain judges are appointed for ulterior purposes or, alternatively, that there exists some racial or gender bias within the Judicial Services Commission. This holds unfortunate consequences for the perceived legitimacy of the judiciary and strengthens the call for more structure and clarity in the appointment of judges.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The application of BEE legislation on employment
- Authors: Loock, Madelaine
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Business enterprises -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Affirmative action programs -- South Africa , Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/17990 , vital:28551
- Description: BBBEE is currently on everyone’s minds and the uncertainty surrounding the changes to the Codes of Good Practice as well as the Sector Codes leaves business owner’s with a feeling of uncomfortable anticipation. The changes to the Codes of Good Practice has set the tone and most of the Sector Codes are being modelled around the Codes. Business owners will have to adapt to the changes and plan in advance in order to avoid being without a compliant BEE certificate. This will entail a strategic analysis of the company’s financial position as well as a strategic BEE plan for the 12 months they will be rated on.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Inherent requirements of a job as a defence to unfair discrimination
- Authors: Le Roux, André
- Date: 2015
- Subjects: Unfair labor practices -- South Africa , Affirmative action programs -- South Africa , Discrimination in employment -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/8757 , vital:26427
- Description: Equality is a fundamental constitutional value in the Constitution. Formal equality presupposes that all persons are equal bearers of rights and that inequality can be eliminated by extending the same rights to all. Formal equality is blind to social and economic differences between groups and individuals. Substantive equality, on the other hand, is receptive to entrenched, structural inequality, meaning that the equality clause of the Constitution must be read as founded on a substantive concept of equality. An employer can utilise the defence of an inherent requirement of a job in the case of an unfair-discrimination claim since the defence is available in terms of both the Employment Equity Act, in respect of employment discrimination, and the Labour Relations Act in respect of discriminatory dismissals. The defence is narrow in that only essential duties of a particular job will be taken into account to determine inherent requirements of a particular job. Reported judgments where this defence is used are scant. What makes the defence more onerous is that an employer has to show that the particular employee could not be reasonably accommodated, before the inherent-requirement defence will succeed. It is integral to the determination of whether there was unfair discrimination and whether such discrimination was justifiable. An important debate in our discrimination law relates to the question of whether any significance should be attached to the fact that only unfair discrimination is outlawed. Neither of the aforementioned pieces of legislation clearly state that affirmative action or an inherent requirement of a job are the only defences available to employers. Where these two defences are found to be not applicable, may the fairness be decided in terms of a general fairness defence? This question is also addressed in the present treatise. It is submitted that foreign law is a valuable interpretive tool, provided it is used wisely, in that judgments originating from courts and tribunals in the United Kingdom and Canada may assist to provide an understanding of the issues central to employment discrimination law and the parameters of the defence of inherent requirements of the job. Thus, in developing employment discrimination law in South Africa, consideration of foreign jurisprudence may prove informative.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2015
Unfair discrimination and affirmative action in the South African Police Service
- Authors: Taylor, Nicola
- Date: 2012
- Subjects: Discrimination in employment -- South Africa , Affirmative action programs -- South Africa , South African Police
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/8693 , vital:26421
- Description: Affirmative action is the purposeful, planned placement and development of competent or potentially competent persons in or to positions from which they were debarred in the past. Affirmative action is an attempt to redress past population, on a local and national level. One of the requirements of affirmative action in South Africa is that it must target persons who have been discriminted by unfair discrimination in the past. the Emplyment Equity Act was brought into the South African government to bring equality to all. Unfair discrimination is a branch of affirmative action in which individuals are discriminated against not only on race, but includes colour, sex, religion, age, disability, language and the likes. Section 9 of the Constitution of South Africa prohibits unfair discrimination against any person on any of the listed grounds. Section 2 of the Employment Equity Act is in place to aim to achieve equity within the workplace by promoting equal opportunity and fair treatment as well as eliminating unfair discrimination. Section 6, like the Constitution, lists grounds against which an individual may not be discriminated. Historically, the South African Police Services were a deeply-routed racist organization, where only white males were afforded better opportunities. This however changed after South Africa became a democratic country and with the introduction of the SAPS Act. Transformation within the SAPS took place after South Africa moved towards a democratic society.
- Full Text: false
- Date Issued: 2012