http://vital.seals.ac.za:8080/vital/access/manager/Index en-us 5 http://vital.seals.ac.za:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:28655 Wed 12 May 2021 20:20:21 SAST ]]> http://vital.seals.ac.za:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:29033 Wed 10 Aug 2022 07:08:59 SAST ]]> http://vital.seals.ac.za:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:42195 Thu 29 Aug 2024 11:09:07 SAST ]]> http://vital.seals.ac.za:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:31075 Thu 13 May 2021 08:45:50 SAST ]]> http://vital.seals.ac.za:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5166 185cm). All subjects were habituated to treadmill locomotion prior to exposure to three walking treatments (0.83, 1.39 and 1.94m.s⁻¹) and three running treatments (2.50, 3.06 and 3.61m.s⁻¹). During each of these five-minute locomotor conditions, energetic (V02), kinematic (cadence and stride length) and psychophysical (central and local RPE) data were captured. From these data, lines of best fit were calculated for each subject, allowing for a prediction of the abovementioned locomotor variables from known absolute rates of progression. Using suitable regression equations, subject responses to morphology-normalised speeds of walking and running were effectively extrapolated. When the rate of progression was expressed in absolute terms (m.s⁻¹), significant differences (P <0.05) were found between the stature-related groups with respect to both energetic and kinematic locomotor responses. Such differences were successfully eliminated when use was made of locomotor speeds relativised on the basis of morphology. This study concludes that the use of appropriately prescribed morphology-normalised rates of progression are effective in reducing the variability in locomotor responses between subjects differing significantly in stature.]]> Thu 13 May 2021 06:06:01 SAST ]]>