- Title
- The implementation of foundational provision programmes in a rural based University in South Africa: implications for student academic development practices
- Creator
- Marhaya, Luyanda
- Subject
- Education, Higher -- South Africa
- Subject
- College student development programs
- Date Issued
- 2016-05
- Date
- 2016-05
- Type
- Doctoral theses
- Type
- text
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10353/24706
- Identifier
- vital:63529
- Description
- The purpose was to establish how foundational provision programmes were implemented in a rural based university in South Africa and implications to student development practices. The study was located in the- post- positivism research paradigm, followed a mixed methods research approach and utilised a concurrent triangulation research design. For the qualitative component of the research, participants (academics and Coordinators of the foundation programmes and senior students who had enrolled through foundational provision programmes) were purposively sampled. The sample for the quantitative data comprised all the students who enrolled in foundation provision programmes between the years 2008 to 2011 and mainstream students who had enrolled between the years 2009 and 2012. For qualitative approach, focus group discussions were conducted, semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Quantitative data was sought from university institutional data storage warehouse, HIGHER EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (HEMIS). For qualitative approach, the data analysis for all data collection methods was done through thematic analysis. For quantitative approach, a longitudinal analysis was conducted to track and compare two cohorts of mainstream and foundation students in terms of retention, attrition and graduation rates. Quantitative data were analysed statistically by use of descriptive and some inferential statistics. Main findings were that: there was inadequate capacity institutionally for developed systems of admission for students entering foundation programmes, lack of curriculum compliance by different lecturers and lack of knowledge of curriculum reforms by lecturers who teach in foundation level, funding for foundation provision programmes was not adequate and lacked transparency. However, there were adequate recruitment processes in the university for lecturers that teach in foundational foundation provision programme and there was no government interference into how foundation programmes are governed. The study also found that students had experienced the student development practices positively, however, these practices were not enough, and equally most responsive student development practice did not exist at the institution under study. The study also found that there had been consistent funding from government but there was no proper expenditure systems in the institution. The study found that, in terms of graduation rates, the two groups compared relatively the same as there was no significant differences in patterns and trends that were observed. However, retention rates suggest that, in the first year, the two groups perform relatively the same, thereafter, there is a significant difference into how the two groups perform as they proceed to other years, especially the second year, where the mainstream cohort showed better performance than their foundation provision programme counterparts. Consequently, high attrition rates were experienced by foundation provision students than mainstream students, this was also experienced a lot more during the second year and third year transition. The implication of these findings was that due to institutional factors that affect the implementation of foundation programmes, these had notable impact on the attrition and dropout rates on foundation provision students. In addition, due to a lack of responsive student development practices, foundation programmes compared relatively low to their mainstream counterparts in retention. The study has recommended a model that can be implemented in the institution. The first component of the model is to put an admission system in place. Institution has to establish a platform where faculties present development plans for foundation provision programmes. In addition, there should be a dedicated Accountant managing finances of the foundation programme. The institution should establish the Tracking and Monitoring student development practice, establish Writing Centres and Learning Communities and employ more people in the Centre for Higher Education, Teaching and Learning department to ensure full implementation of existing student development practices and those that will be established.
- Description
- Thesis (PhD) -- Faculty of Education, 2016
- Format
- computer
- Format
- online resource
- Format
- application/pdf
- Format
- 1 online resource (251 leaves)
- Format
- Publisher
- University of Fort Hare
- Publisher
- Faculty of Education
- Language
- English
- Rights
- University of Fort Hare
- Rights
- All Rights Reserved
- Rights
- Open Access
- Hits: 330
- Visitors: 357
- Downloads: 35
Collections
UFH School of Education
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | SOURCE1 | Final thesis Marhaya 27 May for QA final.pdf | 4 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |