Comparing models for predicting species' potential distributions : a case study using correlative and mechanistic predictive modelling techniques

Robertson, Mark P; Peter, Craig I; Villet, Martin H; Ripley, Bradford S

Title: Comparing models for predicting species' potential distributions : a case study using correlative and mechanistic predictive modelling techniques
Creator: Robertson, Mark P
Creator: Peter, Craig I
Creator: Villet, Martin H
Creator: Ripley, Bradford S
Date Issued: 2003
Date: 2003
Type: Article
Identifier: vital:6539
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1005980
Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00028-0
Description: Models used to predict species’ potential distributions have been described as either correlative or mechanistic. We attempted to determine whether correlative models could perform as well as mechanistic models for predicting species potential distributions, using a case study. We compared potential distribution predictions made for a coastal dune plant (Scaevola plumieri) along the coast of South Africa, using a mechanistic model based on summer water balance (SWB), and two correlative models (a profile and a group discrimination technique). The profile technique was based on principal components analysis (PCA) and the group-discrimination technique was based on multiple logistic regression (LR). Kappa (κ) statistics were used to objectively assess model performance and model agreement. Model performance was calculated by measuring the levels of agreement (using κ) between a set of testing localities (distribution records not used for model building) and each of the model predictions. Using published interpretive guidelines for the kappa statistic, model performance was “excellent” for the SWB model (κ=0.852), perfect for the LR model (κ=1.000), and “very good” for the PCA model (κ=0.721). Model agreement was calculated by measuring the level of agreement between the mechanistic model and the two correlative models. There was “good” model agreement between the SWB and PCA models (κ=0.679) and “very good” agreement between the SWB and LR models (κ=0.786). The results suggest that correlative models can perform as well as or better than simple mechanistic models. The predictions generated from these three modelling designs are likely to generate different insights into the potential distribution and biology of the target organism and may be appropriate in different situations. The choice of model is likely to be influenced by the aims of the study, the biology of the target organism, the level of knowledge the target organism’s biology, and data quality.
Format: 24 pages
Format: pdf
Language: English
Relation: Robertson, M.P. and Peter, C.I. and Villet, M.H. and Ripley, B.S. (2003) Comparing models for predicting species’ potential distributions: a case study using correlative and mechanistic predictive modelling techniques. Ecological Modelling, 64 (2-3). pp. 153-167. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00028-0

Hits: 1067
Visitors: 1235
Downloads: 178

Collections

Peter, Craig (Assoc Prof)

Ripley, Bradford Sherman (Prof)

Villet, Martin Herrer (Prof)

RU Department of Botany

SDG 15. Life On Land

RU Department of Zoology and Entomology

		Thumbnail	File	Description	Size	Format
View Details Download			SOURCEPDF	PDF	946 KB	Adobe Acrobat PDF	View Details Download