Climate change, genetics or human choice: why were the shells of mankind’s earliest ornament larger in the Pleistocene than in the Holocene?

Teske, Peter R; Papadopoulos, Isabelle; McQuaid, Christopher D; Newman, Brent K; Barker, Nigel P

Title: Climate change, genetics or human choice: why were the shells of mankind’s earliest ornament larger in the Pleistocene than in the Holocene?
Creator: Teske, Peter R
Creator: Papadopoulos, Isabelle
Creator: McQuaid, Christopher D
Creator: Newman, Brent K
Creator: Barker, Nigel P
Date Issued: 2007
Date: 2007
Type: Article
Identifier: vital:6952
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1011984
Description: The southern African tick shell, Nassarius kraussianus (Dunker, 1846), has been identified as being the earliest known ornamental object used by human beings. Shell beads dated from ~75,000 years ago (Pleistocene era) were found in a cave located on South Africa's south coast. Beads made from N. kraussianus shells have also been found in deposits in this region dating from the beginning of the Holocene era (<10,000 years ago). These younger shells were significantly smaller, a phenomenon that has been attributed to a change in human preference. We investigated two alternative hypotheses explaining the difference in shell size: a) N. kraussianus comprises at least two genetic lineages that differ in size; b) the difference in shell size is due to phenotypic plasticity and is a function of environmental conditions. To test these hypotheses, we first reconstructed the species' phylogeographic history, and second, we measured the shell sizes of extant individuals throughout South Africa. Although two genetic lineages were identified, the sharing of haplotypes between these suggests that there is no genetic basis for the size differences. Extant individuals from the cool temperate west coast had significantly larger shells than populations in the remainder of the country, suggesting that N. kraussianus grows to a larger size in colder water. The decrease in fossil shell size from Pleistocene to Holocene was likely due to increased temperatures as a result of climate change at the beginning of the present interglacial period. We hypothesise that the sizes of N. kraussianus fossil shells can therefore serve as indicators of the climatic conditions that were prevalent in a particular region at the time when they were deposited. Moreover, N. kraussianus could serve as a biomonitor to study the impacts of future climate change on coastal biota in southern Africa.
Format: 5 pages
Format: pdf
Language: English
Relation: Teske, P.R. and Papadopoulos, I. and McQuaid, C.D. and Newman, B.K. and Barker, N.P. (2007) Climate change, genetics or human choice: why were the shells of mankind’s earliest ornament larger in the Pleistocene than in the Holocene? PLoS ONE, 2 (7). Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000614

Hits: 1054
Visitors: 1149
Downloads: 104

Collections

Teske, Peter R (Prof)

Barker, Nigel Paul (Dr)

SDG 13. Climate Action

McQuaid, Christopher D (Distinguished Professor)

RU Department of Botany

SDG 15. Life On Land

RU Department of Zoology and Entomology

SDG 14. Life Below Water

		Thumbnail	File	Description	Size	Format
View Details Download			SOURCEPDF	PDF	150 KB	Adobe Acrobat PDF	View Details Download