- Title
- Transcription factor motif quality assessment requires systematic comparative analysis
- Creator
- Kibet, Cabel K
- Creator
- Machanick, Philip
- Subject
- To be catalogued
- Date Issued
- 2016
- Date
- 2016
- Type
- text
- Type
- article
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10962/439366
- Identifier
- vital:73570
- Identifier
- https://f1000research.com/articles/4-1429
- Description
- Transcription factor (TF) binding site prediction remains a challenge in gene regulatory research due to degeneracy and potential variability in binding sites in the genome. Dozens of algorithms designed to learn binding models (motifs) have generated many motifs available in research papers with a subset making it to databases like JASPAR, UniPROBE and Transfac. The presence of many versions of motifs from the various databases for a single TF and the lack of a standardized assessment technique makes it difficult for biologists to make an appropriate choice of binding model and for algorithm developers to benchmark, test and improve on their models. In this study, we review and evaluate the approaches in use, highlight differences and demonstrate the difficulty of defining a standardized motif assessment approach. We review scoring functions, motif length, test data and the type of performance metrics used in prior studies as some of the factors that influence the outcome of a motif assessment. We show that the scoring functions and statistics used in motif assessment influence ranking of motifs in a TF-specific manner. We also show that TF binding specificity can vary by source of genomic binding data. We also demonstrate that information content of a motif is not in isolation a measure of motif quality but is influenced by TF binding behaviour. We conclude that there is a need for an easy-to-use tool that presents all available evidence for a comparative analysis.
- Format
- 35 pages
- Format
- Language
- English
- Relation
- F1000Research
- Relation
- Kibet, C.K. and Machanick, P., 2016. Transcription factor motif quality assessment requires systematic comparative analysis. F1000Research, 4, pp.ISCB-Comm
- Relation
- F1000Research volume 2016 number 1 1 35 2016
- Rights
- Publisher
- Rights
- Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the F1000Research Policy Statement (https://f1000research.com/about/policies#licenses)
- Hits: 3
- Visitors: 4
- Downloads: 1
Collections
Machanick, Philip (Assoc Prof)
RU Research Unit in Bioinformatics (RUBi)
RU Department of Computer Science
RU Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Bioinformatics
SDG 09. Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | SOURCE1 | Transcription factor motif quality assessment requires systematic comparative analysis.pdf | 5 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |