- Title
- The impact of re-establishment practices on tree survival, growth and uniformity in South African eucalypt plantations
- Creator
- Hechter, Ullrich
- Subject
- Forests and forestry -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal
- Subject
- Forest nurseries -- South Africa -- KwaZulu Natal Forest management -- South Africa -- KwaZulu Natal
- Date Issued
- 2019
- Date
- 2019
- Type
- Thesis
- Type
- Masters
- Type
- MSc
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10948/40338
- Identifier
- vital:36142
- Description
- Commercial forestry plantations in South Africa play an important role in the economy of the country, contributing 1.2% towards the gross domestic product, as well as with job creation in rural communities. Currently plantation forests occupy 1.1% (1.2 million hectares) of the South African land surface, of which 75 000 hectares are re-established each year. Eucalypts are the preferred species in the commercial forestry industry as they have the ability to grow fast. In addition, desirable characteristics from different eucalypt species can be combined to develop hybrids that can be used to further improve productivity. In South Africa, eucalypt plantations are mostly found in the warm temperate and sub-tropical zones situated in the KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga Provinces. Various strategies are used to increase productivity and maximise site occupancy, including genetic tree improvement, site-species matching, optimising stand densities, management for risk (abiotic and biotic), as well as improved silviculture. Intensive silviculture is practiced by forest companies to maximise initial tree survival and reduce the time to canopy closure. This includes practices such as site preparation, slash management, tree protection, pruning and thinning, fertilisation and vegetation management treatments. Of the silvicultural aspects that are important during re-establishment, pitting, plant quality (plant size) and watering techniques/regimes have all been shown to influence short-term stand productivity. Despite research carried out on these individual components, recommendations as to best operating practices are varied and have changed over the years, with the application of these practices also varying across companies. Furthermore, there is limited published information related to the interaction between these practices, as well as any longer-term impacts of these factors on stand productivity. The objective of the present study was to gain an understanding of the impacts of pitting, plant quality (plant size), planting depth and watering on tree survival, growth and uniformity in South African Eucalyptus plantations. The study was carried out using three separate field trial series. In a first experiment, two field trials compared post-establishment performance of eucalypts planted using various pitting methods. The two trials were planted using Eucalyptus grandis and E. grandis x E. nitens on two contrasting sites, one at Greenhill in the KwaZulu-Natal Midlands and one at Vroegeveld in Mpumalanga. Four manual (notch, agricultural hoe, mattock, road pick) and three motor-manual heads (inverted A, Archimedes screw and Mondi-designed pitting head) were used to prepare and determine the effect of pit size/quality on tree survival, growth and uniformity. The notch pit implement created the smallest pit (1 L volume) compared to the other pitting implements (4 – 6 L volumes). For both trials, pitting method did not have a significant impact on the success of re-establishment or longer-term tree performance (6 yrs 7 mos at Greenhill and 3 yrs 7 mos at Vroegeveld). This indicates that for the sites and the species tested, all pitting implements could be considered viable alternatives. Other factors, such as operational costs, efficiency and ergonomics should be considered when selecting appropriate pitting methods together with tree performance. In a second experiment, three field trials were implemented to test three main factors: plant size (small and large); planting depth (standard and deep); and watering (dry and water planting). The eight treatments (2 x 2 x 2 factorial) were replicated four times and laid out in a randomised complete blocks design. The trials were established across a range of site types (Mt Home in Kwazulu-Natal, Vroegeveld in Mpumalanga and Trust in Zululand) in the summer rainfall region of South Africa using various eucalypt genera (E. dunnii, E. grandis x E. nitens and E. grandis x E. urophylla). Tree performance was assessed, with results up to four, six and seven years presented for the different sites. Results show that planting larger plants had the highest overall survival (x̄ = 81%) compared to smaller plants (x̄ = 58%), which also resulted in improved basal area and volume across all sites. Larger plants were able to tolerate a wider range of site conditions, thus providing an advantage for re-establishment. The cost-to-benefit of this however needs to be assessed, particularly in the context of current operational nursery standards. The benefits of deeper planting and applying water at planting are less clear, but appear to be beneficial under water stress conditions, such as on sandy sites when the weather is hot and dry. A third experiment tested the interaction between different methods of pit preparation (manual versus motor-manual), dry versus water planting, and re-watering at periodic intervals. The experiment consisted of one field trial established with E. dunnii in Greytown, KwaZulu-Natal. Twelve treatments (2 x 6 factorial) were replicated four times and laid out in a split-plot design, with the main factor of watering regime forming the whole plots, and pitting method the sub-plots. Differences in pit size, pit quality and tree performance were assessed. Pit dimensions and soil friability for the two pitting treatments were different, but pit volumes were similar (manually prepared pits = 4.7 L; motor-manually prepared pits = 4.4 L). Differences in pit soil moisture content were detected between dry planting (4.1%) and all other treatments (9.9%). Rainfall occurred in week 1 - 4 after planting (55.2 mm). Subsequently re-watering, relative to watering only at planting, was not beneficial. No significant growth differences occurred between the two pitting methods, nor was there any interaction between the main factors (pitting methods x watering regimes). Survival for dry planting (75%) was significantly lower than all the other treatments (92%), with a weakly significant difference in Biomass index (corrected) (BIc) at one year. Different pit qualities, determined by pitting method, will not significantly affect early eucalypt performance. However, the addition of water or hydrogel (as opposed to dry planting) will improve early eucalypt survival and growth. Eucalypt survival, growth and uniformity in South Africa continue to be impacted by an increase in mechanisation, changing climate conditions and the use of unskilled labour. It is therefore necessary to implement silvicultural practices which improve survival, growth and uniformity. Planting seedlings into good quality pits (regardless of pitting method) with water has shown to improve survival. It is also beneficial in terms of survival to plant larger (prime) plants at a deeper depth especially on sites with drought conditions. Despite all the establishment trials which have been implemented under controlled conditions, high mortality is still experienced and could be due to the lack of knowledge on the effects of plant quality and handling on post planting performance (particularly survival). In future, plant quality and handling in combination with various planting densities and the application of plant stress relievers should be considered to improve survival..
- Format
- xiii, 91 leaves
- Format
- Publisher
- Nelson Mandela University
- Publisher
- Faculty of Science
- Language
- English
- Rights
- Nelson Mandela University
- Hits: 934
- Visitors: 1183
- Downloads: 292
Collections
NMU School of Natural Resource Management
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | SOURCE1 | Ullrich Hechter.pdf | 1 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |