- Title
- Re-evaluating the law of vicarious liability in South Africa
- Creator
- Small, Jonathan Noel
- Subject
- Independent contractors -- South Africa Law -- South Africa Torts -- South Africa Courts -- South Africa Jurisdiction -- South Africa International law -- South Africa Roman law Roman-Dutch law
- Date Issued
- 2008
- Date
- 2008
- Type
- Thesis
- Type
- Masters
- Type
- LLM
- Identifier
- vital:3704
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1004771
- Description
- This thesis is an analysis of the law of vicarious liability and its application within the legal framework of delict in South Africa. A brief overview of the historical development of this branch of law is given, with reference to the influences of Roman, Roman-Dutch and English law. That is followed by an exposition of the 'modem' interpretation of vicarious liability as applied in South African courts, highlighting apparent inconsistencies and the need for reform in what has become a persistently controversial area of law. Specific attention is paid to the so-called 'course and scope enquiry' and to the enduring difficulties associated with attributing liability to employers for the deliberate wrongful conduct of their employees. It is argued that the courts have yet to reach consensus on a general principle capable of being applied to the facts of so-called 'deviation cases', and that consequently the legal divergence on these matters gives rise to uncertainty and concern. It is submitted that the way in which the traditional test for vicarious liability is currently applied fails to give true effect to the policy considerations upon which this branch of law is founded. By way of comparison with the South African position, a detailed account of the law of vicarious liability in comparable foreign jurisdictions is given, with emphasis placed on recent developments in England and the British Commonwealth. The study then moves to an analysis of the various policy considerations behind vicarious liability, with particular attention being paid to the role of risk-related liability and the role of risk-assumption in the 'course and scope' enquiry. A comparative analysis follows, highlighting differences between the approaches of the foreign jurisdictions and that taken by the South African courts. The work concludes with a proposal that the South African courts should broaden the scope of vicarious liability and opt for a model similar to that which has recently been adopted in Canada.
- Format
- 191 leaves
- Format
- Publisher
- Rhodes University
- Publisher
- Faculty of Law, Law
- Language
- English
- Rights
- Small, Jonathan Noel
- Hits: 1544
- Visitors: 1679
- Downloads: 216
Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
View Details Download | SOURCEPDF | 23 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |