The impact of violence during strike action on protected strikes
- Authors: Mbeleni, Xolani McGlory
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Industrial relations -- South Africa , Violence -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/45410 , vital:38614
- Description: This research has five important objectives. First, to outline the legal frame work regulating the right to strike. Outlining this legal framework is important in that it will provide an understanding of both the right to strike and the concept of a protected strike. it is crucial to understand what a protected strike is because the concept underlies the entire research. Without understanding it, it will be impossible to answer the main research question. Second, to investigate the causes of violence during protected strikes. An examination of the causes of violence enables the study to suggest possible solutions to end violent strike action in future. After all the LRA envisages in section 1, labour peace and an effective resolution of disputes. Third, to examine how the LRA regulates the use of violence during protected strikes. An understanding of how the LRA regulates violent strike action is important since the LRA is an important piece of legislation which governs South African labour relations. It is important to obtain guidance on how the law regulates such conduct. Fourth, to ascertain the courts’ approach towards violence during strikes The courts’ approach helps us understand how the courts will deal with strike violence during 5 protected strikes. It is also noteworthy that case precedents in this regard will be of importance when faced with similar acts of violence during strike action. Fifth, to examine the legal implications of violence during protected strikes. This objective directly answers the main research question and this will enable the study to offer possible recommendations in the final chapter of this study.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Mbeleni, Xolani McGlory
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Industrial relations -- South Africa , Violence -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/45410 , vital:38614
- Description: This research has five important objectives. First, to outline the legal frame work regulating the right to strike. Outlining this legal framework is important in that it will provide an understanding of both the right to strike and the concept of a protected strike. it is crucial to understand what a protected strike is because the concept underlies the entire research. Without understanding it, it will be impossible to answer the main research question. Second, to investigate the causes of violence during protected strikes. An examination of the causes of violence enables the study to suggest possible solutions to end violent strike action in future. After all the LRA envisages in section 1, labour peace and an effective resolution of disputes. Third, to examine how the LRA regulates the use of violence during protected strikes. An understanding of how the LRA regulates violent strike action is important since the LRA is an important piece of legislation which governs South African labour relations. It is important to obtain guidance on how the law regulates such conduct. Fourth, to ascertain the courts’ approach towards violence during strikes The courts’ approach helps us understand how the courts will deal with strike violence during 5 protected strikes. It is also noteworthy that case precedents in this regard will be of importance when faced with similar acts of violence during strike action. Fifth, to examine the legal implications of violence during protected strikes. This objective directly answers the main research question and this will enable the study to offer possible recommendations in the final chapter of this study.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The legal framework of concession agreements in Nigerian ports
- Authors: Sanni, Tajudeen
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Concessions -- Nigeria , Public law -- Nigeria Public-private sector cooperation -- Nigeria Marine terminals -- Economic aspects -- Nigeria
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , LLD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/20537 , vital:29317
- Description: The thesis examines the legal framework for concession agreements in Nigerian ports. The principal question is whether the legal framework for concession in ports is adequate. In order to answer this question, a number of related questions are raised and answered by analysis of laws and proposed laws related to ports. One question relates to what laws regulate concession in Nigeria. The thesis submits that a number of laws governs concession, the principal one being the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Act (ICRCA).The Act provides that Federal Government agencies may grant the private sector concession for the financing, construction and maintenance of their infrastructure. In order to examine what this means for the port sector, the thesis examines how concession is being currently implemented in the ports. It is pointed out that under concession policy, a whole lot of operational duties which used to be carried out by the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) were being transferred to private sector in the new port governance paradigm. For this purpose, the possession of key NPA assets such as terminals for handling cargos were being transferred to the private sector vide concession agreements. The official position is that provisions in the Nigeria Ports Authority Act (NPAA) which allow the NPA to grant leases provide justification for the concession agreement. The concession policy also appoints the Nigeria Shippers Council (NSC) as the economic regulator of the ports to regulate economic activities such as tariff charged in the port. The thesis proceeds to examine the question whether port concession as it is being implemented is actually consistent with NPAA and other relevant laws. The thesis submits that stripping the NPA of a whole string of operational duties on the basis of concession is inconsistent with the provisions of NPAA which establishes the NPA as a regulator, operator and landlord of the port. The thesis posits that the ICRCA does not mandate the NPA to grant concession but rather leaves the decision to do so to the relevant government agencies such as the NPA. It is further submitted that the provision allowing the NPA to lease out its asset must be read with another provision restricting such leases to assets that are not necessary for the performance of NPA’s statutory duties. The thesis argues that this is based on the canon of statutory interpretation that one section of the law must be read holistically with the other sections. It is further argued that designation of NSC as economic regulator not only runs contrary to the Nigeria Shippers Council Act but also Utilities Charges Regulatory Commission Act (UCRCA) which regulates ports tariff and appoints UCRC as the relevant agency for this purpose. The thesis proceeds to examine the question whether the proposed laws, Nigeria Port and Harbour Authority Bill (NPHB) which establishes the port authority as the landlord cum regulator of port and the National Transport Commission Bill (NTCB) which establishes port economic regulator provide adequate legal provisions for port concession. The thesis posits that both bills legalize concession for the performance of core port functions by the private sector. However both contain some clauses that run contrary to the objectives stated therein. NPHB, for example, requires that the bill must be read in the context of the specific objective of separating landlord and regulatory duty from cargo-handling functions in the port. In contrast to this, the bill grants the NPA the duty to carry out port business and the powers to run cargo-handling business in addition to its landlord and regulatory functions. It is proposed that there should be a provision in the port bill providing a separate public company to compete with concessionaires for port businesses while the port authority concentrates on its technical regulatory and landlord duty that will allow it to enter into concession agreements as an independent entity. The thesis makes other proposals for the improvement of the aspects of the bills relating to port concession including inclusion of an outline of terms of concession agreement in the bill, public access to concession agreement, among others. It is recommended that the proposals are considered when the bills are passed into laws and concession agreements renegotiated on the basis of the bills when they become laws.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Sanni, Tajudeen
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Concessions -- Nigeria , Public law -- Nigeria Public-private sector cooperation -- Nigeria Marine terminals -- Economic aspects -- Nigeria
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , LLD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/20537 , vital:29317
- Description: The thesis examines the legal framework for concession agreements in Nigerian ports. The principal question is whether the legal framework for concession in ports is adequate. In order to answer this question, a number of related questions are raised and answered by analysis of laws and proposed laws related to ports. One question relates to what laws regulate concession in Nigeria. The thesis submits that a number of laws governs concession, the principal one being the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Act (ICRCA).The Act provides that Federal Government agencies may grant the private sector concession for the financing, construction and maintenance of their infrastructure. In order to examine what this means for the port sector, the thesis examines how concession is being currently implemented in the ports. It is pointed out that under concession policy, a whole lot of operational duties which used to be carried out by the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) were being transferred to private sector in the new port governance paradigm. For this purpose, the possession of key NPA assets such as terminals for handling cargos were being transferred to the private sector vide concession agreements. The official position is that provisions in the Nigeria Ports Authority Act (NPAA) which allow the NPA to grant leases provide justification for the concession agreement. The concession policy also appoints the Nigeria Shippers Council (NSC) as the economic regulator of the ports to regulate economic activities such as tariff charged in the port. The thesis proceeds to examine the question whether port concession as it is being implemented is actually consistent with NPAA and other relevant laws. The thesis submits that stripping the NPA of a whole string of operational duties on the basis of concession is inconsistent with the provisions of NPAA which establishes the NPA as a regulator, operator and landlord of the port. The thesis posits that the ICRCA does not mandate the NPA to grant concession but rather leaves the decision to do so to the relevant government agencies such as the NPA. It is further submitted that the provision allowing the NPA to lease out its asset must be read with another provision restricting such leases to assets that are not necessary for the performance of NPA’s statutory duties. The thesis argues that this is based on the canon of statutory interpretation that one section of the law must be read holistically with the other sections. It is further argued that designation of NSC as economic regulator not only runs contrary to the Nigeria Shippers Council Act but also Utilities Charges Regulatory Commission Act (UCRCA) which regulates ports tariff and appoints UCRC as the relevant agency for this purpose. The thesis proceeds to examine the question whether the proposed laws, Nigeria Port and Harbour Authority Bill (NPHB) which establishes the port authority as the landlord cum regulator of port and the National Transport Commission Bill (NTCB) which establishes port economic regulator provide adequate legal provisions for port concession. The thesis posits that both bills legalize concession for the performance of core port functions by the private sector. However both contain some clauses that run contrary to the objectives stated therein. NPHB, for example, requires that the bill must be read in the context of the specific objective of separating landlord and regulatory duty from cargo-handling functions in the port. In contrast to this, the bill grants the NPA the duty to carry out port business and the powers to run cargo-handling business in addition to its landlord and regulatory functions. It is proposed that there should be a provision in the port bill providing a separate public company to compete with concessionaires for port businesses while the port authority concentrates on its technical regulatory and landlord duty that will allow it to enter into concession agreements as an independent entity. The thesis makes other proposals for the improvement of the aspects of the bills relating to port concession including inclusion of an outline of terms of concession agreement in the bill, public access to concession agreement, among others. It is recommended that the proposals are considered when the bills are passed into laws and concession agreements renegotiated on the basis of the bills when they become laws.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The obligation on employers to effect affirmative action measures
- Authors: Papu, Mzimkulu Gladman
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Discrimination in employment -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , South Africa -- Employment Equity Act -- 1998 , Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19738 , vital:28949
- Description: Since 1994, South Africa has undergone socio-economic, political and demographic transformation. The Employment Equity Act (No 55) of 1998 aims to facilitate workplace transformation through the elimination of unfair discrimination and the implementation of affirmative action measures to enable equitable representation of employees in all occupational categories and levels in the workplace. This legislation was amended on 1 August 2014, and South Africa has watched with keen interest to see what the impact of the amendments to the Employment Equity Act would be on the world of work. For many it was to see whether job seekers and individuals from the designated groups experienced equity in access to the workplace and fair treatment in employment. For others, it was to see to what extent businesses would either benefit from its accountability and fairness to all employees or suffer from increased regulatory compliance to employment equity and affirmative action amendments. At the heart of the amendments was a need to make the South African Constitution real for South Africans in facilitating work inclusive environments in which people are enabled and motivated to contribute to the goals of the organisation. The state must respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights in the Bill of Rights, one of these rights being equality. Affirmative action as a component of employment equity is inherently part of the process of increasing and managing diversity and identifying barriers to fair employment. Transformation does make business sense. No business will survive in the long-run, unless it reinvents itself and constantly adapts to the ever-changing demands of an increasingly competitive global environment in which it operates. An organisation’s ability to create a work culture in which diversity management is effectively managed is more likely to experience the positive effects thereof on its business. Organisations require a diverse workforce with the requisite multidisciplinary talents and knowledge to achieve its goals in an ever-changing environment. The evaluation of the extent of the progress and the narrative is to be drawn from the reported workplace demographics. This is made up of statistical analyses of the representation of individuals from designated groups at different occupational levels, as well as training and progression of designated employees by reporting employers. The ultimate test of transformation however, is in the extent to which employees would vouch for the inclusivity of the workplace environment and the total absence of unfair discrimination based on listed and arbitrary grounds. For the Commission to be able to comment on the experience of diversity management and inclusion as part of employment equity, a different approach needs to be taken. I am excited to share that the Commission’s strategic plan for the period 2016 to 2021 has prioritised the need to go beyond workforce demographic statistics and move towards a better understanding of the experience of fair treatment, diversity and “inclusion” Management. There is a significant shift in the way in which the Commission is approaching its work, in the interest of the country. It is not the aim of the Commission for Employment Equity to focus its attention on the punitive measures for non-compliance only, and accordingly the third Commission hosted the Employment Equity Awards, which recognise the good work done by organisations towards furthering the transformation agenda. The third Commission moreover developed a number of Codes of Good Practice to support the implementation of employment equity. A lot of ground was covered to enable the fourth Commission to focus on their mandate more effectively. We are grateful for their hard work and we wish them well as we look forward to realising our objectives. On a different note, the United Nations offices in New York were a hub of activity and rigorous debate during the March 2016 Summit on the Status of Women. One of the themes extensively interrogated at the summit was “Women Empowerment in the economic space”. Globally, not enough is happening to turn the economic status of women. The United Nations Sustainable Goal 5 is “Gender Equality”. A 50-50 target has been set for female representivity at all occupational levels globally. South Africa needs to work towards this goal as part of their contribution. The Summit echoed the words “Women leaders in the business world is everyone’s business”. It would do us proud in the future to be able to report significant progress in this area. Another topical issue was “Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value”. Three countries, namely Canada, Sweden and Iceland have committed themselves to pay parity across gender by 2022. South Africa on the other hand has already enacted this policy. We need to see significant change in this area. In line with the discussions during the summit, I would also like to encourage designated employers in South Africa to review policies in favour of transparency around remuneration. This will go a long way in creating an enabling environment for elimination of unfair discrimination in the workplace.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Papu, Mzimkulu Gladman
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Discrimination in employment -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , South Africa -- Employment Equity Act -- 1998 , Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19738 , vital:28949
- Description: Since 1994, South Africa has undergone socio-economic, political and demographic transformation. The Employment Equity Act (No 55) of 1998 aims to facilitate workplace transformation through the elimination of unfair discrimination and the implementation of affirmative action measures to enable equitable representation of employees in all occupational categories and levels in the workplace. This legislation was amended on 1 August 2014, and South Africa has watched with keen interest to see what the impact of the amendments to the Employment Equity Act would be on the world of work. For many it was to see whether job seekers and individuals from the designated groups experienced equity in access to the workplace and fair treatment in employment. For others, it was to see to what extent businesses would either benefit from its accountability and fairness to all employees or suffer from increased regulatory compliance to employment equity and affirmative action amendments. At the heart of the amendments was a need to make the South African Constitution real for South Africans in facilitating work inclusive environments in which people are enabled and motivated to contribute to the goals of the organisation. The state must respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights in the Bill of Rights, one of these rights being equality. Affirmative action as a component of employment equity is inherently part of the process of increasing and managing diversity and identifying barriers to fair employment. Transformation does make business sense. No business will survive in the long-run, unless it reinvents itself and constantly adapts to the ever-changing demands of an increasingly competitive global environment in which it operates. An organisation’s ability to create a work culture in which diversity management is effectively managed is more likely to experience the positive effects thereof on its business. Organisations require a diverse workforce with the requisite multidisciplinary talents and knowledge to achieve its goals in an ever-changing environment. The evaluation of the extent of the progress and the narrative is to be drawn from the reported workplace demographics. This is made up of statistical analyses of the representation of individuals from designated groups at different occupational levels, as well as training and progression of designated employees by reporting employers. The ultimate test of transformation however, is in the extent to which employees would vouch for the inclusivity of the workplace environment and the total absence of unfair discrimination based on listed and arbitrary grounds. For the Commission to be able to comment on the experience of diversity management and inclusion as part of employment equity, a different approach needs to be taken. I am excited to share that the Commission’s strategic plan for the period 2016 to 2021 has prioritised the need to go beyond workforce demographic statistics and move towards a better understanding of the experience of fair treatment, diversity and “inclusion” Management. There is a significant shift in the way in which the Commission is approaching its work, in the interest of the country. It is not the aim of the Commission for Employment Equity to focus its attention on the punitive measures for non-compliance only, and accordingly the third Commission hosted the Employment Equity Awards, which recognise the good work done by organisations towards furthering the transformation agenda. The third Commission moreover developed a number of Codes of Good Practice to support the implementation of employment equity. A lot of ground was covered to enable the fourth Commission to focus on their mandate more effectively. We are grateful for their hard work and we wish them well as we look forward to realising our objectives. On a different note, the United Nations offices in New York were a hub of activity and rigorous debate during the March 2016 Summit on the Status of Women. One of the themes extensively interrogated at the summit was “Women Empowerment in the economic space”. Globally, not enough is happening to turn the economic status of women. The United Nations Sustainable Goal 5 is “Gender Equality”. A 50-50 target has been set for female representivity at all occupational levels globally. South Africa needs to work towards this goal as part of their contribution. The Summit echoed the words “Women leaders in the business world is everyone’s business”. It would do us proud in the future to be able to report significant progress in this area. Another topical issue was “Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value”. Three countries, namely Canada, Sweden and Iceland have committed themselves to pay parity across gender by 2022. South Africa on the other hand has already enacted this policy. We need to see significant change in this area. In line with the discussions during the summit, I would also like to encourage designated employers in South Africa to review policies in favour of transparency around remuneration. This will go a long way in creating an enabling environment for elimination of unfair discrimination in the workplace.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The procedural fairness requirement in suspensions
- Authors: Japtha, Louisa Dihelena
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Labor discipline -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- Complaints against -- South Africa , Employee rights -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/17603 , vital:28400
- Description: The focal point of this treatise is the procedural requirements relating to suspensions. For a suspension to be fair it must be for a fair reason and in accordance with a fair procedure which is commonly referred to as substantive and procedural fairness. The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 does not tell or provide guidance in terms of what these procedural requirements for a suspension are. The Act is completely silent on this matter. The Act only requires that any disciplinary measure instituted against an employee must be done in terms of a fair procedure. Suspensions have been described by our courts as the employment equivalent of arrest. It is normally used as a preventative measure pending internal disciplinary investigations or as a disciplinary sanction for an employee who repeatedly engages in misconduct. This treatise highlights the impact of arbitrary suspension of employees and suspensions of employees for inordinate periods of time. Suspensions are not intended for purposes of punishment. The Labour Court has on numerous decisions cautioned employers on issues of unfair suspension because of its detrimental impact on the employee’s reputation, advancement, job security and other grounds. Situations have often arisen where an employer suspends an employee without following any procedure. This practice was particularly prevalent under the common law and before the judgment in Mogothle v the Premier of the Northwest Province and Another when employers were suspending employees as they saw fit. Following the principles in this case, bearing in mind that each case is judged on its own merits and the detrimental effect of a suspension. A suspension should only be warranted in circumstances where: The employer has a justifiable reason to believe prima facie at least that the employee has engaged in serious misconduct; There is some objectively justifiable reason to deny the employee access to the workplace based on the integrity of any pending investigation into the alleged misconduct or some other relevant factor that would place the investigation or the interest of affected parties in jeopardy. The employee is given the opportunity to state a case or to be heard before any final decision to suspend is made. Although the right to be heard is not a formally defined process, case law has developed this concept to such an extent that it will be regarded as unfair labour practice if not adhered to. A suspension of an employee can therefore never be justified without adhering to the audi alteram partem principle. This does not mean that an employer cannot suspend an employee. Our courts accept that suspension is necessary especially for purposes of good administration and is justified, following the correct procedure and where the employer continues to pay the employee. Despite the fact that the courts are playing a more active role with regards to the issue of suspensions, suspensions are often open to abuse. In this regard the treatise focused on the notion of special leave versus suspensions. We note how in the last few years, employers especially those in the public service sector, misconstrued and misused their power for a purpose not authorised in law, and continue to do so despite applications to the courts alerting it to the illegality of this practice. Employers are resorting to special leave with the aim of side stepping the procedural requirements laid down by our courts in respect of section 182 (2) of the Labour Relations Act. In this regard the courts vehemently criticised this practice and ensured that employers who are acting maliciously without adhering to their own policies and procedures are held accountable. The court held that in the event where special leave is imposed on an employee for the purposes of discipline, that special leave is regarded as a suspension. Lastly, it is quite evident that the courts are playing a much more active role pertaining to the issue of suspensions. A number of court decisions discussed in this treatise show how the courts come down hard on employers who hastily resort to suspending an employee where there is no valid reason to do so or where the procedure was manifestly unfair.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Japtha, Louisa Dihelena
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Labor discipline -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- Complaints against -- South Africa , Employee rights -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/17603 , vital:28400
- Description: The focal point of this treatise is the procedural requirements relating to suspensions. For a suspension to be fair it must be for a fair reason and in accordance with a fair procedure which is commonly referred to as substantive and procedural fairness. The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 does not tell or provide guidance in terms of what these procedural requirements for a suspension are. The Act is completely silent on this matter. The Act only requires that any disciplinary measure instituted against an employee must be done in terms of a fair procedure. Suspensions have been described by our courts as the employment equivalent of arrest. It is normally used as a preventative measure pending internal disciplinary investigations or as a disciplinary sanction for an employee who repeatedly engages in misconduct. This treatise highlights the impact of arbitrary suspension of employees and suspensions of employees for inordinate periods of time. Suspensions are not intended for purposes of punishment. The Labour Court has on numerous decisions cautioned employers on issues of unfair suspension because of its detrimental impact on the employee’s reputation, advancement, job security and other grounds. Situations have often arisen where an employer suspends an employee without following any procedure. This practice was particularly prevalent under the common law and before the judgment in Mogothle v the Premier of the Northwest Province and Another when employers were suspending employees as they saw fit. Following the principles in this case, bearing in mind that each case is judged on its own merits and the detrimental effect of a suspension. A suspension should only be warranted in circumstances where: The employer has a justifiable reason to believe prima facie at least that the employee has engaged in serious misconduct; There is some objectively justifiable reason to deny the employee access to the workplace based on the integrity of any pending investigation into the alleged misconduct or some other relevant factor that would place the investigation or the interest of affected parties in jeopardy. The employee is given the opportunity to state a case or to be heard before any final decision to suspend is made. Although the right to be heard is not a formally defined process, case law has developed this concept to such an extent that it will be regarded as unfair labour practice if not adhered to. A suspension of an employee can therefore never be justified without adhering to the audi alteram partem principle. This does not mean that an employer cannot suspend an employee. Our courts accept that suspension is necessary especially for purposes of good administration and is justified, following the correct procedure and where the employer continues to pay the employee. Despite the fact that the courts are playing a more active role with regards to the issue of suspensions, suspensions are often open to abuse. In this regard the treatise focused on the notion of special leave versus suspensions. We note how in the last few years, employers especially those in the public service sector, misconstrued and misused their power for a purpose not authorised in law, and continue to do so despite applications to the courts alerting it to the illegality of this practice. Employers are resorting to special leave with the aim of side stepping the procedural requirements laid down by our courts in respect of section 182 (2) of the Labour Relations Act. In this regard the courts vehemently criticised this practice and ensured that employers who are acting maliciously without adhering to their own policies and procedures are held accountable. The court held that in the event where special leave is imposed on an employee for the purposes of discipline, that special leave is regarded as a suspension. Lastly, it is quite evident that the courts are playing a much more active role pertaining to the issue of suspensions. A number of court decisions discussed in this treatise show how the courts come down hard on employers who hastily resort to suspending an employee where there is no valid reason to do so or where the procedure was manifestly unfair.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The regulation of sick and incapacity leave in the public sector
- Authors: Gunguta, Thembeka Maureen
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Sick leave -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Labor policy -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/16087 , vital:28319
- Description: The Public Service is service delivery driven, and is dependent on the quality, skill and performance of the employees to carry through its business. It is therefore imperative that the policies and systems pertaining to human capital are effectively and efficiently managed. The Basic Conditions of Employment Act regulates the basic conditions of employment and states that employees’ may be absent from duty due to illness. The public sector uses the Determination on the Leave of Absence in the Public Service as a tool to regulate leave in the public sector. The Determination provides employees with 36 paid sick days to be utilised by an employee within a three-year cycle. In cases where an employee has exhausted the sick leave, the employer may grant Temporary Incapacity Leave, which is discretional. The Public Service Commission has a constitutional obligation to monitor the performance of the public sector and produce reports covering the human resources management practices. With regards to the management of leave in the public sector, the reports reveal the abuse of sick leave by employees, non-compliance and the in-effective management. The Department of Public Service and Administration then developed the PILIR as a guide to manage and administer sick and incapacity leave in the public sector. This treatise therefore, discusses the regulation of sick and incapacity leave in the public sector and investigates the extent to which the applicable legislative framework is effective. The discussion uses the Labour Court judgment in the matter between The Public Service Association & Others versus the PSCBC & Others as reference, and further evaluates the judicial jurisprudence to demonstrate the extent of contentions of the private sector employers by the employees. Furthermore, this treatise seeks to evaluate the extent of similarities or differences of the practices both the private sector and the municipalities. In conclusion, the treatise makes recommendations on the best practices that can be adopted by the public sector to turn the situation around.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Gunguta, Thembeka Maureen
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Sick leave -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Labor policy -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/16087 , vital:28319
- Description: The Public Service is service delivery driven, and is dependent on the quality, skill and performance of the employees to carry through its business. It is therefore imperative that the policies and systems pertaining to human capital are effectively and efficiently managed. The Basic Conditions of Employment Act regulates the basic conditions of employment and states that employees’ may be absent from duty due to illness. The public sector uses the Determination on the Leave of Absence in the Public Service as a tool to regulate leave in the public sector. The Determination provides employees with 36 paid sick days to be utilised by an employee within a three-year cycle. In cases where an employee has exhausted the sick leave, the employer may grant Temporary Incapacity Leave, which is discretional. The Public Service Commission has a constitutional obligation to monitor the performance of the public sector and produce reports covering the human resources management practices. With regards to the management of leave in the public sector, the reports reveal the abuse of sick leave by employees, non-compliance and the in-effective management. The Department of Public Service and Administration then developed the PILIR as a guide to manage and administer sick and incapacity leave in the public sector. This treatise therefore, discusses the regulation of sick and incapacity leave in the public sector and investigates the extent to which the applicable legislative framework is effective. The discussion uses the Labour Court judgment in the matter between The Public Service Association & Others versus the PSCBC & Others as reference, and further evaluates the judicial jurisprudence to demonstrate the extent of contentions of the private sector employers by the employees. Furthermore, this treatise seeks to evaluate the extent of similarities or differences of the practices both the private sector and the municipalities. In conclusion, the treatise makes recommendations on the best practices that can be adopted by the public sector to turn the situation around.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The right to engage in collective bargaining
- Authors: Oliphant, Lukhanyo Shane
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Collective bargaining -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Industrial relations -- South Africa Employee rights -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19463 , vital:28881
- Description: The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA) was formulated by consensus from Government, Labour and Business. The advent of the new democratic dispensation brought with it the need to bring reforms to the country’s repressive labour laws, which were the hallmarks of the former apartheid regime. The new democratic dispensation’s priority was to ensure that the laws governing the employment relationship were again in line, with the International Labour Organization’s requirements (ILO). The consolidation of the country’s labour laws became critical for the new democratic dispensation because it became imperative that labour laws, once and for all became inclusive of all South Africa’s working force. During this post democratic period South Africa has been able to bring this consolidation to our regulatory framework through democratizing labour relations. This has meant that all organized workers for the first time after 1995, could have access to collective bargaining. South Africa has also enjoyed a period of relative labour stability during this period but only until recently, has the institution of collective bargaining been under the severest attack. This contestation in this labour regime is about the constitutional right to engage in collective bargaining. It has become of paramount importance to understand the meaning of this right to engage in collective bargaining, how far does this right extend to organized employees and most importantly what are now the impediments to the realization of this right? This is a broad and a very important topic in our labour law jurisprudence. The rationale for this treatise is to articulate the right to engage in collective bargaining, amid recent developments. At the same time to probe whether or not a justiciable duty to bargain in good faith (legally enforceable duty), should be reintroduced in our collective bargaining framework. This would be an option in reestablishing this institution in the face of insurmountable challenges, particularly as far as managing the conduct of bargaining parties during the collective bargaining process. The LRA does not envision such a legally enforceable duty to bargain in our labour relations framework, preferring rather apolicy based on voluntarism. The LRA has instead created a legally recognized framework were bargaining parties, determine their own collective process, without undue interference from the state and the courts. This has been the position since the inception of the new democratic order.Times have changed constitutional challenges have been mounting against provisions of the LRA, which have been deemed by some as unconstitutional. This is reference to the inaccessibility of the collective bargaining process; relating directly to the right to engage in collective bargaining.The disjuncture between the Constitution and the enabling legislation the LRA will also be scrutinized, as the result has been confusion regarding the meaning and the application of this constitutional right to engage in collective bargaining.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Oliphant, Lukhanyo Shane
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Collective bargaining -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Industrial relations -- South Africa Employee rights -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19463 , vital:28881
- Description: The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA) was formulated by consensus from Government, Labour and Business. The advent of the new democratic dispensation brought with it the need to bring reforms to the country’s repressive labour laws, which were the hallmarks of the former apartheid regime. The new democratic dispensation’s priority was to ensure that the laws governing the employment relationship were again in line, with the International Labour Organization’s requirements (ILO). The consolidation of the country’s labour laws became critical for the new democratic dispensation because it became imperative that labour laws, once and for all became inclusive of all South Africa’s working force. During this post democratic period South Africa has been able to bring this consolidation to our regulatory framework through democratizing labour relations. This has meant that all organized workers for the first time after 1995, could have access to collective bargaining. South Africa has also enjoyed a period of relative labour stability during this period but only until recently, has the institution of collective bargaining been under the severest attack. This contestation in this labour regime is about the constitutional right to engage in collective bargaining. It has become of paramount importance to understand the meaning of this right to engage in collective bargaining, how far does this right extend to organized employees and most importantly what are now the impediments to the realization of this right? This is a broad and a very important topic in our labour law jurisprudence. The rationale for this treatise is to articulate the right to engage in collective bargaining, amid recent developments. At the same time to probe whether or not a justiciable duty to bargain in good faith (legally enforceable duty), should be reintroduced in our collective bargaining framework. This would be an option in reestablishing this institution in the face of insurmountable challenges, particularly as far as managing the conduct of bargaining parties during the collective bargaining process. The LRA does not envision such a legally enforceable duty to bargain in our labour relations framework, preferring rather apolicy based on voluntarism. The LRA has instead created a legally recognized framework were bargaining parties, determine their own collective process, without undue interference from the state and the courts. This has been the position since the inception of the new democratic order.Times have changed constitutional challenges have been mounting against provisions of the LRA, which have been deemed by some as unconstitutional. This is reference to the inaccessibility of the collective bargaining process; relating directly to the right to engage in collective bargaining.The disjuncture between the Constitution and the enabling legislation the LRA will also be scrutinized, as the result has been confusion regarding the meaning and the application of this constitutional right to engage in collective bargaining.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The role of the CCMA to mitigate job losses in the context of operational requirements dismissal
- Authors: Mbali, Rian Bongani
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa South Africa. Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration -- Rules and practice , Mediation and conciliation, Industria -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/45536 , vital:38641
- Description: All employers at some point in time may find themselves under pressure, facing financial challenges, which may force them into contemplating some reductions in their operating costs. This could result in an exercise that may entail restructuring the wage bill. This in turn could eventually result in the dismissal of employees for operational reasons. The concept of job security is a new phenomenon in the labour market and with localisation and the economic crisis that have caused businesses to become competitive, workers face the threat of losing jobs daily. It must be stated that the International Labour Organisation (hereinafter referred to as ILO), which is an international body responsible for developing principles and guidelines which regulate labour relations in the world, had only in 1963 taken some steps to give due regard to the law that seek to promote employment security1. Until then, the common law dictated the nature of the relationship with regard to the rules that govern the termination of employment. The study will further investigate the international trends in the embedding of the Convention of Termination of Employment. Against this context, this treatise seeks to highlight the work done to further provide measures of employment security for workers facing dismissal based on operational requirements. The study will examine the role of the Commission for the Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (hereinafter referred to as CCMA), an impartial body in South Africa, whose main function is to prevent and resolve labour disputes, as well as to mitigate job losses in the context of operational requirements dismissals.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Mbali, Rian Bongani
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa South Africa. Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration -- Rules and practice , Mediation and conciliation, Industria -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/45536 , vital:38641
- Description: All employers at some point in time may find themselves under pressure, facing financial challenges, which may force them into contemplating some reductions in their operating costs. This could result in an exercise that may entail restructuring the wage bill. This in turn could eventually result in the dismissal of employees for operational reasons. The concept of job security is a new phenomenon in the labour market and with localisation and the economic crisis that have caused businesses to become competitive, workers face the threat of losing jobs daily. It must be stated that the International Labour Organisation (hereinafter referred to as ILO), which is an international body responsible for developing principles and guidelines which regulate labour relations in the world, had only in 1963 taken some steps to give due regard to the law that seek to promote employment security1. Until then, the common law dictated the nature of the relationship with regard to the rules that govern the termination of employment. The study will further investigate the international trends in the embedding of the Convention of Termination of Employment. Against this context, this treatise seeks to highlight the work done to further provide measures of employment security for workers facing dismissal based on operational requirements. The study will examine the role of the Commission for the Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (hereinafter referred to as CCMA), an impartial body in South Africa, whose main function is to prevent and resolve labour disputes, as well as to mitigate job losses in the context of operational requirements dismissals.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The safety of navigation and the role of port state jurisdiction: a South African perspective
- Authors: Metuge, Denning Ngomele
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Harbors -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Law of the sea -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19343 , vital:28853
- Description: This thesis set to examine whether South Africa has incorporated the provisions on vessel navigational safety standards established in the relevant international instruments developed by the IMO: the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS) as amended, the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (STCW) as amended, and the Convention on International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREGs) as amended. It also set to determine the regulatory scope for the exercise of port State jurisdiction from a South African perspective. To establish whether a vessel’s condition complies to prescribed navigational safety standards, the relevant international instruments require States that have ratified the instruments not only to ensure that vessels registered under their flag are inspected for compliance before they can navigate, but that foreign visiting vessels must be surveyed to ensure that they also comply with the safety standards. These surveys are conducted while vessels are in the port of a port State. In addition, the Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 (LOSC), provides in article 218 that the port State may enforce anti-pollution regulations committed by a vessel that calls at one of its ports, after committing an illegal discharge outside the territorial waters of the State and its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). However, the provisions of article 218 LOSC have been the center of scholarly debate on the scope of port State jurisdiction (PSJ). Whilst one school of thought holds that PSJ refers only to the provisions of article 218 LOSC, another contends that in defining PSJ, its meaning must be awarded a broader scope to include the regulation of navigational safety standards. Due to the varied opinions on the scope of PSJ, this thesis examined the regulatory framework for the exercise of port State jurisdiction (PSJ) in South Africa. The discussion was relevant to determine the role of PSJ to enhance navigational safety from a South African perspective. This thesis comprised of an in-depth analysis of primary and secondary sources of data relevant to the regulation of navigational safety. The data obtained was critically discussed to establish whether the relevant international navigational safety standards are incorporated into South African law. The process included critical discussions on the principle of jurisdiction, and its exercise by States under international law. The discussions analysed the complexities associated with defining jurisdiction and determining its scope, which are relevant in respect of States’ competence to prescribe and enforce domestic laws, in conformity with the requirements of the LOSC. International law awards jurisdiction to the State to regulate laws within its national territory subject to some restrictions. However, the meaning of jurisdiction is not easily discernible even to lawyers. The discussions showed that the Republic exercises jurisdiction in conformity with generally accepted grounds for the exercise of jurisdiction, and that it is the prerogative of the State to adopt laws it deems necessary within its territory. Thus, the incorporation of international instruments on the safety of navigation is not a forgone conclusion, as it is dependent on the will of the State to ratify, and give effect to the provisions of the relevant instruments in its domestic law. Furthermore, this thesis discussed the relevant international safety instruments in contrast to the provisions of South African merchant shipping regulations, to identify any regulatory gaps in the incorporation of their provisions in South African law. Against a background of comparative analyses of the international norms and the provisions of South African merchant shipping regulations, this research found that a significant number of the relevant international safety instruments are incorporated into south African law by Merchant Shipping Act (MSA) as amended, and regulations made in terms of the Act. The provisions of South African merchant shipping regulations are administered by the South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA). However, whilst this research found little doubt that the provisions of the STCW and COLREGs are given full effect in South African law, it identified regulatory differences in respect of the most relevant of all international instruments with regard to the safety of navigation, SOLAS. Some SOLAS provisions in respect of navigational safety are not incorporated into domestic law, and in some instances where they are incorporated, the provisions of domestic law contrasts that of SOLAS, or are not as comprehensive. For instance, there is a contrast in the provisions of the Navigation Bridge Visibility Regulations (NVBR), that make the regulations applicable to vessels of 45m or more in length constructed before 1 July 2008. Whereas, SOLAS regulations in respect of the navigation bridge visibility standards of vessels apply to vessels 55m or more length. Furthermore, a 5 months extension may be awarded in respect of a safety certificate issued for a South African vessel that is not in the Republic on the date of its expiry. This provision goes beyond the requirement of SOLAS, which requires that no extension be granted for a period longer than 3 months. Likewise, SAMSA may grant an extension of a safety certificate other than a cargo vessel construction certificate, for a period no longer than five month to enable a foreign vessel to complete its journey to its country of registry or point of inspection. This extension again, is longer than the 3 months requirement under SOLAS. Moreover, the survey requirements applicable to all South African vessels where ever they may be, and all foreign merchant vessels that come into the Republic, do not reflect the specific provisions of SOLAS. A significant amendment was made to SOLAS by SOLAS PROT 1988. SOLAS PROT 1988 introduced the harmonised system of survey and certification (HSSC) into the provisions of SOLAS, thereby harmonising its survey standards with those of other international instruments. SOLAS PROT 1988 has come into force for all States that have ratified the Protocol since the year 2000. This thesis finds that while South Africa is a party to SOLAS as amended by SOLAS PROT 1978, the Republic has not yet ratified SOLAS PROT 1988. Hence, the Republic is not bound to any requirements of SOLAS PROT 1988. Furthermore, although States that are not party to an international instrument requiring the implementation of the HSSC are invited to implement the HSSC anyway, there is no provision in the MSA that incorporates the HSSC. Of central importance to the regulation of merchant shipping standards, States are not only required to adopt domestic laws giving effect to international standards, but they are required to implement international standards in a uniform manner. This is aimed at avoiding a merchant shipping arena plagued by conflicting unilateral domestic rules. SOLAS PROT 1988 has been ratified by States comprising of 96% of the world’s merchant fleet by tonnage. The massive acceptance of SOLAS PROT 1988 is indicative of the international trend, towards uniformity in the implementation of international norms. This thesis recommends that, for the Republic’s merchant shipping regulations to reflect the international trend, the Republic should amend its merchant shipping regulation to incorporate the HSSC. Alternatively, the Republic may ratify SOLAS PROT 1988, and give full effect to its survey and certification standards and the relevant navigational safety provisions in the ANNEX of SOLAS.In addition, whilst a debate abounds on the international scene in respect of the scope of port State jurisdiction, the analysis of the regulatory framework for the exercise of port State jurisdiction in South Africa found that the regulatory framework for the exercise of port State jurisdiction by the Republic includes the regulation of not only environment-related navigational standards prescribed by article 218 LOSC, but also, navigational safety standards, and significantly, its scope is not burdened by the international law limitations to the exercise of coastal State jurisdiction. As such, a recommendation is made to the effect that when defining PSJ, its scope should not be limited to the enforcement of standards contained in article 218 LOSC, rather, it should be awarded a broader scope to include the regulation of other navigational standards including safety.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Metuge, Denning Ngomele
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Harbors -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Law of the sea -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19343 , vital:28853
- Description: This thesis set to examine whether South Africa has incorporated the provisions on vessel navigational safety standards established in the relevant international instruments developed by the IMO: the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS) as amended, the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (STCW) as amended, and the Convention on International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREGs) as amended. It also set to determine the regulatory scope for the exercise of port State jurisdiction from a South African perspective. To establish whether a vessel’s condition complies to prescribed navigational safety standards, the relevant international instruments require States that have ratified the instruments not only to ensure that vessels registered under their flag are inspected for compliance before they can navigate, but that foreign visiting vessels must be surveyed to ensure that they also comply with the safety standards. These surveys are conducted while vessels are in the port of a port State. In addition, the Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 (LOSC), provides in article 218 that the port State may enforce anti-pollution regulations committed by a vessel that calls at one of its ports, after committing an illegal discharge outside the territorial waters of the State and its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). However, the provisions of article 218 LOSC have been the center of scholarly debate on the scope of port State jurisdiction (PSJ). Whilst one school of thought holds that PSJ refers only to the provisions of article 218 LOSC, another contends that in defining PSJ, its meaning must be awarded a broader scope to include the regulation of navigational safety standards. Due to the varied opinions on the scope of PSJ, this thesis examined the regulatory framework for the exercise of port State jurisdiction (PSJ) in South Africa. The discussion was relevant to determine the role of PSJ to enhance navigational safety from a South African perspective. This thesis comprised of an in-depth analysis of primary and secondary sources of data relevant to the regulation of navigational safety. The data obtained was critically discussed to establish whether the relevant international navigational safety standards are incorporated into South African law. The process included critical discussions on the principle of jurisdiction, and its exercise by States under international law. The discussions analysed the complexities associated with defining jurisdiction and determining its scope, which are relevant in respect of States’ competence to prescribe and enforce domestic laws, in conformity with the requirements of the LOSC. International law awards jurisdiction to the State to regulate laws within its national territory subject to some restrictions. However, the meaning of jurisdiction is not easily discernible even to lawyers. The discussions showed that the Republic exercises jurisdiction in conformity with generally accepted grounds for the exercise of jurisdiction, and that it is the prerogative of the State to adopt laws it deems necessary within its territory. Thus, the incorporation of international instruments on the safety of navigation is not a forgone conclusion, as it is dependent on the will of the State to ratify, and give effect to the provisions of the relevant instruments in its domestic law. Furthermore, this thesis discussed the relevant international safety instruments in contrast to the provisions of South African merchant shipping regulations, to identify any regulatory gaps in the incorporation of their provisions in South African law. Against a background of comparative analyses of the international norms and the provisions of South African merchant shipping regulations, this research found that a significant number of the relevant international safety instruments are incorporated into south African law by Merchant Shipping Act (MSA) as amended, and regulations made in terms of the Act. The provisions of South African merchant shipping regulations are administered by the South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA). However, whilst this research found little doubt that the provisions of the STCW and COLREGs are given full effect in South African law, it identified regulatory differences in respect of the most relevant of all international instruments with regard to the safety of navigation, SOLAS. Some SOLAS provisions in respect of navigational safety are not incorporated into domestic law, and in some instances where they are incorporated, the provisions of domestic law contrasts that of SOLAS, or are not as comprehensive. For instance, there is a contrast in the provisions of the Navigation Bridge Visibility Regulations (NVBR), that make the regulations applicable to vessels of 45m or more in length constructed before 1 July 2008. Whereas, SOLAS regulations in respect of the navigation bridge visibility standards of vessels apply to vessels 55m or more length. Furthermore, a 5 months extension may be awarded in respect of a safety certificate issued for a South African vessel that is not in the Republic on the date of its expiry. This provision goes beyond the requirement of SOLAS, which requires that no extension be granted for a period longer than 3 months. Likewise, SAMSA may grant an extension of a safety certificate other than a cargo vessel construction certificate, for a period no longer than five month to enable a foreign vessel to complete its journey to its country of registry or point of inspection. This extension again, is longer than the 3 months requirement under SOLAS. Moreover, the survey requirements applicable to all South African vessels where ever they may be, and all foreign merchant vessels that come into the Republic, do not reflect the specific provisions of SOLAS. A significant amendment was made to SOLAS by SOLAS PROT 1988. SOLAS PROT 1988 introduced the harmonised system of survey and certification (HSSC) into the provisions of SOLAS, thereby harmonising its survey standards with those of other international instruments. SOLAS PROT 1988 has come into force for all States that have ratified the Protocol since the year 2000. This thesis finds that while South Africa is a party to SOLAS as amended by SOLAS PROT 1978, the Republic has not yet ratified SOLAS PROT 1988. Hence, the Republic is not bound to any requirements of SOLAS PROT 1988. Furthermore, although States that are not party to an international instrument requiring the implementation of the HSSC are invited to implement the HSSC anyway, there is no provision in the MSA that incorporates the HSSC. Of central importance to the regulation of merchant shipping standards, States are not only required to adopt domestic laws giving effect to international standards, but they are required to implement international standards in a uniform manner. This is aimed at avoiding a merchant shipping arena plagued by conflicting unilateral domestic rules. SOLAS PROT 1988 has been ratified by States comprising of 96% of the world’s merchant fleet by tonnage. The massive acceptance of SOLAS PROT 1988 is indicative of the international trend, towards uniformity in the implementation of international norms. This thesis recommends that, for the Republic’s merchant shipping regulations to reflect the international trend, the Republic should amend its merchant shipping regulation to incorporate the HSSC. Alternatively, the Republic may ratify SOLAS PROT 1988, and give full effect to its survey and certification standards and the relevant navigational safety provisions in the ANNEX of SOLAS.In addition, whilst a debate abounds on the international scene in respect of the scope of port State jurisdiction, the analysis of the regulatory framework for the exercise of port State jurisdiction in South Africa found that the regulatory framework for the exercise of port State jurisdiction by the Republic includes the regulation of not only environment-related navigational standards prescribed by article 218 LOSC, but also, navigational safety standards, and significantly, its scope is not burdened by the international law limitations to the exercise of coastal State jurisdiction. As such, a recommendation is made to the effect that when defining PSJ, its scope should not be limited to the enforcement of standards contained in article 218 LOSC, rather, it should be awarded a broader scope to include the regulation of other navigational standards including safety.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The social security law position of employees involved in motor vehicle accidents
- Authors: Njamela, Marrof Zalisile
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Social security -- Law and legislation Traffic accidents
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/20121 , vital:29126
- Description: The primary purpose of the study is to highlight the social security law position of employees involved in MVAs. The study concludes and notes that: The current social security system provides an inadequate prevention strategy for employees involved in MVAs. A blanket program of fitness for work as an occupational accident prevention tool should be legislated and be part of the OHSA general duties of employers to their employees. A social security system that attempts to address loss of ability to earn as a result of occupational injury must incorporate an integrated approach towards prevention of risks, compensation and rehabilitation. Social security legal instruments currently providing compensation for employees involved in MVAs (RAF and COIDA) are promulgated for more benefits. A RTW plan, Vocational assessment and rehabilitation of injured employees, all processes that will aid continued employment for injured employees, will be included. This will ensure that employees continue to earn income which forms the basis of social security.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Njamela, Marrof Zalisile
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Social security -- Law and legislation Traffic accidents
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/20121 , vital:29126
- Description: The primary purpose of the study is to highlight the social security law position of employees involved in MVAs. The study concludes and notes that: The current social security system provides an inadequate prevention strategy for employees involved in MVAs. A blanket program of fitness for work as an occupational accident prevention tool should be legislated and be part of the OHSA general duties of employers to their employees. A social security system that attempts to address loss of ability to earn as a result of occupational injury must incorporate an integrated approach towards prevention of risks, compensation and rehabilitation. Social security legal instruments currently providing compensation for employees involved in MVAs (RAF and COIDA) are promulgated for more benefits. A RTW plan, Vocational assessment and rehabilitation of injured employees, all processes that will aid continued employment for injured employees, will be included. This will ensure that employees continue to earn income which forms the basis of social security.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The status of employees employed by temporary employment services
- Authors: Strydom, Masunet
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Employment agencies -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- South Africa Personnel management -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/13680 , vital:27295
- Description: The traditional employer-employee relationship came under an increased threat the past two decades with employers finding the option of utilising the services of Labour Brokers more attractive. Various reasons existed for this tendency amongst employers to opt for the use of Labour Brokers, some of these reasons being valid but mostly some reasons being born out of fear for the unknown labour law duties and obligations that were proposed to be placed on employers post 1994. In the absence of an action plan between the role players in the labour fraternity pathing the way traditional employer-employee relationships could be salvage, employers resorted to the appointment of Labour Brokers and Government on their part retaliated by considering either the total ban of Labour Brokers or the regulation of the profession to such an extent that same became largely unattractive and problematic. The non-addressing of problems and fears faced with by employers post 1994 resulted in an opportunity waisted to narrow the gap between employers and employees with the fight over work force power being the more important factor taken into consideration. This treatise will explore the options that faced the roll players post 1994 in the labour market, the reason for choices made and the effect same has had since on the labour market. The problematic amendments made to Section 198 of the Labour Relations Act in an attempt to iron out the wrinkles poor choices made by the stake holders over the regulations of Labour Brokers, will be discussed. The ripple effect the amendments to Section 198 of the Labour Relations Act had on other pieces of South African legislation will be considered and the uncertainty and confusion it has created discussed. Specific attention needs to be drawn to the intention of the legislature as to which party, the Labour Broker or employer, will be responsible for the ramifications of the wrong doings of an employee. Also, which party will be responsible to the employee to fulfil its labour rights as granted in the Constitution of South Africa. Unleashing reaction to the regulations of Temporary Employment Services does not seem to be a problem, the problem arises where the regulations proposed did not unleashed the desired reaction and roll players finding themselves frustrated and with having no alternative as to turn the Courts to solve the largely self-inflicted conundrum. The courts are left with the task of clarifying the legislature’s true intension in amending section 198 of the Labour Relations Act, which impact the writer with all due respect do not think the legislature even appreciated when the amendments were drafted. Currently, there is dividing views on the future of Labour Brokers per se in South Africa and the interpretation concerning Section 198 of the Labour Relations Act, as amended. The focus of this treatise is to highlight the different interpretations given to these amendments this far and highlight that if it is in fact the wish of stake holders in the Labour fraternity that Labour Brokers should continue to exist, clarification is needed by our Constitution Court on certain vital issues and as discussed in this treatise.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Strydom, Masunet
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Employment agencies -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- South Africa Personnel management -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/13680 , vital:27295
- Description: The traditional employer-employee relationship came under an increased threat the past two decades with employers finding the option of utilising the services of Labour Brokers more attractive. Various reasons existed for this tendency amongst employers to opt for the use of Labour Brokers, some of these reasons being valid but mostly some reasons being born out of fear for the unknown labour law duties and obligations that were proposed to be placed on employers post 1994. In the absence of an action plan between the role players in the labour fraternity pathing the way traditional employer-employee relationships could be salvage, employers resorted to the appointment of Labour Brokers and Government on their part retaliated by considering either the total ban of Labour Brokers or the regulation of the profession to such an extent that same became largely unattractive and problematic. The non-addressing of problems and fears faced with by employers post 1994 resulted in an opportunity waisted to narrow the gap between employers and employees with the fight over work force power being the more important factor taken into consideration. This treatise will explore the options that faced the roll players post 1994 in the labour market, the reason for choices made and the effect same has had since on the labour market. The problematic amendments made to Section 198 of the Labour Relations Act in an attempt to iron out the wrinkles poor choices made by the stake holders over the regulations of Labour Brokers, will be discussed. The ripple effect the amendments to Section 198 of the Labour Relations Act had on other pieces of South African legislation will be considered and the uncertainty and confusion it has created discussed. Specific attention needs to be drawn to the intention of the legislature as to which party, the Labour Broker or employer, will be responsible for the ramifications of the wrong doings of an employee. Also, which party will be responsible to the employee to fulfil its labour rights as granted in the Constitution of South Africa. Unleashing reaction to the regulations of Temporary Employment Services does not seem to be a problem, the problem arises where the regulations proposed did not unleashed the desired reaction and roll players finding themselves frustrated and with having no alternative as to turn the Courts to solve the largely self-inflicted conundrum. The courts are left with the task of clarifying the legislature’s true intension in amending section 198 of the Labour Relations Act, which impact the writer with all due respect do not think the legislature even appreciated when the amendments were drafted. Currently, there is dividing views on the future of Labour Brokers per se in South Africa and the interpretation concerning Section 198 of the Labour Relations Act, as amended. The focus of this treatise is to highlight the different interpretations given to these amendments this far and highlight that if it is in fact the wish of stake holders in the Labour fraternity that Labour Brokers should continue to exist, clarification is needed by our Constitution Court on certain vital issues and as discussed in this treatise.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The WTO agreement on technical barriers to trade : a critical appraisal of its implementation within the Southern African Development Community
- Authors: Chimeri, Vongai
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Tariff -- Law and legislation Non-tariff trade barriers -- Law and legislation Foreign trade regulation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/2855 , vital:28108
- Description: The World Trade Organisation Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement) was crafted with the aim of ensuring that technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment procedure do not constitute unnecessary obstacles to international trade. Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries have since ratified this Agreement and took a step further to incorporate its principles into the Technical Barriers to Trade Annex to the SADC Protocol on Trade. Despite this effort, SADC countries are still grappling with implementing the TBT Agreement in their domestic frameworks. Consequently, technical barriers to trade have become impediments to both regional and international trade. It is in this context that this study aims to examine the implementation of the TBT Agreement within the SADC. The study answers the question what are the challenges facing SADC Member states to fully implement the TBT Agreement? The study demonstrates that SADC Member face challenges which include of lack adequate resources, technical expertise and enforcement mechanisms to effectively implement the TBT Agreement. In the finality, the study recommends SADC Member states to deepen regional integration in order to collaborate on matters relating to technical barriers to trade within the region. Member states should also share information and learn from the experiences of other countries on how to effectively implement the TBT Agreement. Further, government officials should be educated on trade-friendly regulations that do not compromise on the principles of the TBT Agreement. To this end, regulatory impact assessments should be established in order to assess the trade effects of both new and old regulations. Effective enforcement mechanisms should also be introduced in order to coerce Member states to comply with their regional obligations. By effecting these recommendations, SADC states have the opportunity to eradicate technical barriers to trade thereby increasing both regional and international trade.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Chimeri, Vongai
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Tariff -- Law and legislation Non-tariff trade barriers -- Law and legislation Foreign trade regulation
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/2855 , vital:28108
- Description: The World Trade Organisation Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement) was crafted with the aim of ensuring that technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment procedure do not constitute unnecessary obstacles to international trade. Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries have since ratified this Agreement and took a step further to incorporate its principles into the Technical Barriers to Trade Annex to the SADC Protocol on Trade. Despite this effort, SADC countries are still grappling with implementing the TBT Agreement in their domestic frameworks. Consequently, technical barriers to trade have become impediments to both regional and international trade. It is in this context that this study aims to examine the implementation of the TBT Agreement within the SADC. The study answers the question what are the challenges facing SADC Member states to fully implement the TBT Agreement? The study demonstrates that SADC Member face challenges which include of lack adequate resources, technical expertise and enforcement mechanisms to effectively implement the TBT Agreement. In the finality, the study recommends SADC Member states to deepen regional integration in order to collaborate on matters relating to technical barriers to trade within the region. Member states should also share information and learn from the experiences of other countries on how to effectively implement the TBT Agreement. Further, government officials should be educated on trade-friendly regulations that do not compromise on the principles of the TBT Agreement. To this end, regulatory impact assessments should be established in order to assess the trade effects of both new and old regulations. Effective enforcement mechanisms should also be introduced in order to coerce Member states to comply with their regional obligations. By effecting these recommendations, SADC states have the opportunity to eradicate technical barriers to trade thereby increasing both regional and international trade.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Unfair dismissal in the context of a transfer of a going concern
- Authors: Mdlaka, Solomzi Siyabonga
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19310 , vital:28848
- Description: The employment relationship between the employer and employee is regulated by individual labour law. Generally, these rules can be found in the contract of employment, the common law and legislation, subject to the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa of 1996. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (hereinafter referred to as the Constitution) provides that ‘everyone has the right to fair labour practices’.1 The term ‘fair labour practice’ is not defined in the Constitution, yet this fundamental right encompasses far more than is expressed in the narrow definition of the term in the Labour Relations Act.2 The right to fair labour practices has its origins in the equity based jurisprudence of the Industrial Court. These decisions cover the labour relations field from individual labour law to collective labour law.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Mdlaka, Solomzi Siyabonga
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/19310 , vital:28848
- Description: The employment relationship between the employer and employee is regulated by individual labour law. Generally, these rules can be found in the contract of employment, the common law and legislation, subject to the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa of 1996. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (hereinafter referred to as the Constitution) provides that ‘everyone has the right to fair labour practices’.1 The term ‘fair labour practice’ is not defined in the Constitution, yet this fundamental right encompasses far more than is expressed in the narrow definition of the term in the Labour Relations Act.2 The right to fair labour practices has its origins in the equity based jurisprudence of the Industrial Court. These decisions cover the labour relations field from individual labour law to collective labour law.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
The protection of Company Capital in Contemporary Company Law: South Africa and Selected Commonwealth Jurisdictions
- Bidie, Simphiwe Sincere https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-2715
- Authors: Bidie, Simphiwe Sincere https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-2715
- Date: 2016-12
- Subjects: Corporation law -- South Africa , Stock repurchasing -- Law and legislation , Commonwealth countries
- Language: English
- Type: Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/29141 , vital:77057
- Description: Rules regulating how the affairs of a company are expected to be conducted have existed since time immemorial changing from one form to another with the advent of time. Common law as espoused by courts played the leading role. In recent years legislation has taken the centre stage informed by a desire for fundamental policy change. The policy change expressed in such legislation suggests that some commonwealth nations are prepared to embrace progressive contemporary measures which may better cater for the relationship of all stakeholders interested in the affairs of the company. The statutory regulation of distributions of company money or property became firmly entrenched in South Africa since 2011. In that year the Companies Act 71 of 2008 formally replaced the Companies Act 61 of 1973. Specifically the Act set out an elaborate list of rules which companies are required to comply with when they wish to distribute some of their money or property. Historically the challenge with the practical application of the capital maintenance principle was that it favoured the interests of creditors above other stakeholders. Even so this principle was not a completely secure mechanism for the protection of creditor interests as the funds they looked to for the satisfaction of their claims continued to be used for the operational requirements of the company or could be far less than the credit they would provide to companies. From that context its replacement by a more secure mechanism was inevitable. The solvency and liquidity test has become the preferred mechanism adopted by many countries across the world to replace the capital maintenance principle. This is the test which must now be observed by companies before directors distribute the company’s capital. In addition a number of prescribed procedural requirements must also be observed. For the purposes of this study the 2008 Companies Act defines distribution of company money or property in four ways. The purpose of this thesis is to critically examine these forms of distributing company money or property. It also seeks to examine the procedural rules by which these forms of distribution may be carried out. Subsequently, rules pertaining to non-compliance with distribution requirements will be analysed to determine when directors may be held personally liable for corporate contraventions or individual misconduct. , Thesis (LLD) -- Faculty of Law, 2016
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016-12
- Authors: Bidie, Simphiwe Sincere https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-2715
- Date: 2016-12
- Subjects: Corporation law -- South Africa , Stock repurchasing -- Law and legislation , Commonwealth countries
- Language: English
- Type: Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/29141 , vital:77057
- Description: Rules regulating how the affairs of a company are expected to be conducted have existed since time immemorial changing from one form to another with the advent of time. Common law as espoused by courts played the leading role. In recent years legislation has taken the centre stage informed by a desire for fundamental policy change. The policy change expressed in such legislation suggests that some commonwealth nations are prepared to embrace progressive contemporary measures which may better cater for the relationship of all stakeholders interested in the affairs of the company. The statutory regulation of distributions of company money or property became firmly entrenched in South Africa since 2011. In that year the Companies Act 71 of 2008 formally replaced the Companies Act 61 of 1973. Specifically the Act set out an elaborate list of rules which companies are required to comply with when they wish to distribute some of their money or property. Historically the challenge with the practical application of the capital maintenance principle was that it favoured the interests of creditors above other stakeholders. Even so this principle was not a completely secure mechanism for the protection of creditor interests as the funds they looked to for the satisfaction of their claims continued to be used for the operational requirements of the company or could be far less than the credit they would provide to companies. From that context its replacement by a more secure mechanism was inevitable. The solvency and liquidity test has become the preferred mechanism adopted by many countries across the world to replace the capital maintenance principle. This is the test which must now be observed by companies before directors distribute the company’s capital. In addition a number of prescribed procedural requirements must also be observed. For the purposes of this study the 2008 Companies Act defines distribution of company money or property in four ways. The purpose of this thesis is to critically examine these forms of distributing company money or property. It also seeks to examine the procedural rules by which these forms of distribution may be carried out. Subsequently, rules pertaining to non-compliance with distribution requirements will be analysed to determine when directors may be held personally liable for corporate contraventions or individual misconduct. , Thesis (LLD) -- Faculty of Law, 2016
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016-12
Accountability and transparency deficits and the problem of non-tariff barriers in the Southern African Development Community : a critical assessment of intra-regional trade promotion initiatives
- Authors: Muleza, Charles
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Southern African Development Community Non-tariff trade barriers
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/18812 , vital:42735
- Description: The Southern African Development Community (SADC) was established with a view to pursuing economic growth and development in the region. However, even after the establishment of the Free Trade Area (FTA), the presence of significant non-tariff barriers (NTBs) has contributed to the lack of progress in achieving these objectives. Therefore, the premise of this study is that the successful realisation of the economic goals of SADC can only be accomplished on the basis of a legal and institutional framework that promotes accountability and transparency at the national and regional level. It is undeniable that this approach is gaining prominence worldwide as more attention is directed towards the removal of NTBs. For the purposes of advancing trade liberalisation within the context of a more transparent and predictable trade regime, this study analyses the strengths and weaknesses of the SADC legal and institutional framework. To that end, it addresses pertinent issues such as, inter alia, the effectiveness of supranational or intergovernmental approaches in regional institutions, the appropriate status of community law within Member States’ jurisdictions and the role of state sovereignty in regional integration. To achieve a clearer understanding of these issues, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) is assessed to obtain insights on the multilateral standards that it sets for the accountability and transparency measures of regional trade agreements (RTAs). The comparative analysis of the European Union (EU), which is viewed as the gold standard for regional integration, also assists in enabling this study to draw lessons for SADC, particularly in the determination of recommendations for legal and institutional reform.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
- Authors: Muleza, Charles
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Southern African Development Community Non-tariff trade barriers
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/18812 , vital:42735
- Description: The Southern African Development Community (SADC) was established with a view to pursuing economic growth and development in the region. However, even after the establishment of the Free Trade Area (FTA), the presence of significant non-tariff barriers (NTBs) has contributed to the lack of progress in achieving these objectives. Therefore, the premise of this study is that the successful realisation of the economic goals of SADC can only be accomplished on the basis of a legal and institutional framework that promotes accountability and transparency at the national and regional level. It is undeniable that this approach is gaining prominence worldwide as more attention is directed towards the removal of NTBs. For the purposes of advancing trade liberalisation within the context of a more transparent and predictable trade regime, this study analyses the strengths and weaknesses of the SADC legal and institutional framework. To that end, it addresses pertinent issues such as, inter alia, the effectiveness of supranational or intergovernmental approaches in regional institutions, the appropriate status of community law within Member States’ jurisdictions and the role of state sovereignty in regional integration. To achieve a clearer understanding of these issues, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) is assessed to obtain insights on the multilateral standards that it sets for the accountability and transparency measures of regional trade agreements (RTAs). The comparative analysis of the European Union (EU), which is viewed as the gold standard for regional integration, also assists in enabling this study to draw lessons for SADC, particularly in the determination of recommendations for legal and institutional reform.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
Alcoholism and being under the influence of alcohol
- Authors: Maliti, Zandisile
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Alcoholism and employment , Misconduct in office , Alcoholism -- Diagnosis
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/8416 , vital:26354
- Description: Being under the influence of alcohol at work or during working hours is dealt with as misconduct. On the other hand, in a case where an employee suffers from alcoholism, such a case is treated as incapacity due to ill health. The possibility of overlap between the two has contributed to a misconception. Alcoholism cases, are at times, incorrectly treated as misconduct. The same applies to cases of being under the influence of alcohol where such cases would be treated as incapacity instead of being treated as misconduct. The distinction between alcoholism and being under the influence of alcohol was made clear in Transnet Freight Rail v Transnet Bargaining Council C644/2009 [2011] ZALCJHB (4 March 2011) where the Labour Court held that employers have an obligation of assisting employees who suffer from alcoholism with counselling and rehabilitation. Such an obligation does not arise when an employee, who is not an alcoholic, comes to work under the influence of alcohol. Whilst the nature of work is taken into consideration in determining whether an employee is under the influence of alcohol or not, the major cause of disharmony in the determination is a common defence of having consumed alcohol during a night before and whether the physical observations combined with positive breathalyser test results or on their own are indicative, on the balance of probabilities, that an employee is under the influence of alcohol or not. There is no need for an employee to injure himself or herself or other employees before a determination is made that he or she is under the influence of alcohol. Physical observations combined with breathalyzer test results, can be indicative of an employee that is being under the influence of alcohol. The nature of work should be an aggravating or mitigating factor rather than a determining factor of guilt.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
- Authors: Maliti, Zandisile
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Alcoholism and employment , Misconduct in office , Alcoholism -- Diagnosis
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/8416 , vital:26354
- Description: Being under the influence of alcohol at work or during working hours is dealt with as misconduct. On the other hand, in a case where an employee suffers from alcoholism, such a case is treated as incapacity due to ill health. The possibility of overlap between the two has contributed to a misconception. Alcoholism cases, are at times, incorrectly treated as misconduct. The same applies to cases of being under the influence of alcohol where such cases would be treated as incapacity instead of being treated as misconduct. The distinction between alcoholism and being under the influence of alcohol was made clear in Transnet Freight Rail v Transnet Bargaining Council C644/2009 [2011] ZALCJHB (4 March 2011) where the Labour Court held that employers have an obligation of assisting employees who suffer from alcoholism with counselling and rehabilitation. Such an obligation does not arise when an employee, who is not an alcoholic, comes to work under the influence of alcohol. Whilst the nature of work is taken into consideration in determining whether an employee is under the influence of alcohol or not, the major cause of disharmony in the determination is a common defence of having consumed alcohol during a night before and whether the physical observations combined with positive breathalyser test results or on their own are indicative, on the balance of probabilities, that an employee is under the influence of alcohol or not. There is no need for an employee to injure himself or herself or other employees before a determination is made that he or she is under the influence of alcohol. Physical observations combined with breathalyzer test results, can be indicative of an employee that is being under the influence of alcohol. The nature of work should be an aggravating or mitigating factor rather than a determining factor of guilt.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
An analysis of the South African common law defence of moderate and reasonable child chastisement
- Authors: Maqhosha, Noluthando
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Common law Corporal punishment
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , Degree
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/5447 , vital:29248
- Description: The study sought to analyse the South African common law defence of moderate and reasonable child chastisement. Regarded by those with religious and cultural beliefs as a way of instilling child discipline, child chastisement has been a centre of contestation in recent years. Constitutionally, children have rights to care, dignity and protection. Thus, child chastisement infringes upon these rights. However, regardless of its intentions, child chastisement has an effect of inflicting pain onto its victims thereby infringing on their rights to human dignity, equality and protection. It can also lead to unintended consequences such as injury or death to its victims. Subjecting children to this cruel, inhuman and degrading action affects the development of children and sometimes haunts them at a later stage in life. In addition, child chastisement lacks the measure of determining whether it is moderate or severe, thereby making it prone to abuse or misuse. The study used a qualitative research paradigm, where data was collected from existing documents and analysed towards understanding child chastisement and finding sustainable ways of improving child welfare in the home or in society. The study also analysed the legal framework on child welfare and chastisement globally, regionally and locally. Instruments such as the UNCRC, ACRWC and the UDHR have a clear stance abolishing child chastisement. The study established that, despite the existence of global instruments promoting child care and protection, the common law defence of corporal punishment in the home and society remains a loophole that needs closing and enactment of laws that outlaws it completely.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
- Authors: Maqhosha, Noluthando
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Common law Corporal punishment
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , Degree
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/5447 , vital:29248
- Description: The study sought to analyse the South African common law defence of moderate and reasonable child chastisement. Regarded by those with religious and cultural beliefs as a way of instilling child discipline, child chastisement has been a centre of contestation in recent years. Constitutionally, children have rights to care, dignity and protection. Thus, child chastisement infringes upon these rights. However, regardless of its intentions, child chastisement has an effect of inflicting pain onto its victims thereby infringing on their rights to human dignity, equality and protection. It can also lead to unintended consequences such as injury or death to its victims. Subjecting children to this cruel, inhuman and degrading action affects the development of children and sometimes haunts them at a later stage in life. In addition, child chastisement lacks the measure of determining whether it is moderate or severe, thereby making it prone to abuse or misuse. The study used a qualitative research paradigm, where data was collected from existing documents and analysed towards understanding child chastisement and finding sustainable ways of improving child welfare in the home or in society. The study also analysed the legal framework on child welfare and chastisement globally, regionally and locally. Instruments such as the UNCRC, ACRWC and the UDHR have a clear stance abolishing child chastisement. The study established that, despite the existence of global instruments promoting child care and protection, the common law defence of corporal punishment in the home and society remains a loophole that needs closing and enactment of laws that outlaws it completely.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
An analysis of the South African common law defence of moderate and reasonable child chastisement
- Authors: Maqhosha, Noluthando
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Common law Common law -- South Africa -- Cases Corporal punishment
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MA (Human Rights)
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/2556 , vital:27894
- Description: The study sought to analyse the South African common law defence of moderate and reasonable child chastisement. Regarded by those with religious and cultural beliefs as a way of instilling child discipline, child chastisement has been a centre of contestation in recent years. Constitutionally, children have rights to care, dignity and protection. Thus, child chastisement infringes upon these rights. However, regardless of its intentions, child chastisement has an effect of inflicting pain onto its victims thereby infringing on their rights to human dignity, equality and protection. It can also lead to unintended consequences such as injury or death to its victims. Subjecting children to this cruel, inhuman and degrading action affects the development of children and sometimes haunts them at a later stage in life. In addition, child chastisement lacks the measure of determining whether it is moderate or severe, thereby making it prone to abuse or misuse. The study used a qualitative research paradigm, where data was collected from existing documents and analysed towards understanding child chastisement and finding sustainable ways of improving child welfare in the home or in society. The study also analysed the legal framework on child welfare and chastisement globally, regionally and locally. Instruments such as the UNCRC, ACRWC and the UDHR have a clear stance abolishing child chastisement. The study established that, despite the existence of global instruments promoting child care and protection, the common law defence of corporal punishment in the home and society remains a loophole that needs closing and enactment of laws that outlaws it completely.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
- Authors: Maqhosha, Noluthando
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Common law Common law -- South Africa -- Cases Corporal punishment
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MA (Human Rights)
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/2556 , vital:27894
- Description: The study sought to analyse the South African common law defence of moderate and reasonable child chastisement. Regarded by those with religious and cultural beliefs as a way of instilling child discipline, child chastisement has been a centre of contestation in recent years. Constitutionally, children have rights to care, dignity and protection. Thus, child chastisement infringes upon these rights. However, regardless of its intentions, child chastisement has an effect of inflicting pain onto its victims thereby infringing on their rights to human dignity, equality and protection. It can also lead to unintended consequences such as injury or death to its victims. Subjecting children to this cruel, inhuman and degrading action affects the development of children and sometimes haunts them at a later stage in life. In addition, child chastisement lacks the measure of determining whether it is moderate or severe, thereby making it prone to abuse or misuse. The study used a qualitative research paradigm, where data was collected from existing documents and analysed towards understanding child chastisement and finding sustainable ways of improving child welfare in the home or in society. The study also analysed the legal framework on child welfare and chastisement globally, regionally and locally. Instruments such as the UNCRC, ACRWC and the UDHR have a clear stance abolishing child chastisement. The study established that, despite the existence of global instruments promoting child care and protection, the common law defence of corporal punishment in the home and society remains a loophole that needs closing and enactment of laws that outlaws it completely.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
An evaluation of the approaches of the arbitrators to the promotion of disputes resolution in public education
- Authors: Dolopi, Nkosana
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) Arbitrators
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/15378 , vital:28236
- Description: Public Education like other sectors such as Health, International Relations, Finance, Local Government and Environmental Affairs that fall under Public Administration as well as business in private, factory and industrial institutions are embraced or characterized by the concept of employer and employee relationships. These relationships are not always wholesome and harmonious but are overshadowed by disputes and strikes which bring about paralysis and polarization of the operation of business and educational stability in public service and administration sectors as well as at learning institutions. These disputes arise from inter alia, disagreements regarding wage negotiations, unfair dismissals, unfair labour practice involving appointments, promotions and transfers, mutual interest, severance pay, automatically dismissals, operational requirements dismissals (both single and multiple), disclosure of information disputes, organizational rights disputes, agency shop disputes, picketing disputes, unfair discrimination disputes in terms of the Employment Equity of Act as amended, and disputes involving the enforcement of collective agreements or the non-compliance with the Basic Conditions of Employment Act and others. Whilst there are similar trends and patterns of disputes in all these sectors, they are, however, not only differ in intensity and rapid occurrence but also in how they are negotiated and settled because the work environments are different at the level of operation, administration and management. What is common in all disputes is that they are all conciliated and arbitrated by arbitrators at the Commission for Conciliation, and Arbitration (hereafter referred to as the CCMA), Education Labour Relations Council (ELRC), Private Resolution Agencies and the Labour Court. The Apartheid era administration had labour laws which dealt with these disputes, but were not progressive and effective in handling them. This placed a heavy burden on the new ANC led government to change the laws of the previous regime. Most of these changes happened in the labour relations and the labour policies. In view of the above situation, the new political dispensation that came into existence and operation in 1994 developed a new labour legislative framework with specific focus on the review of the collective bargaining dispensation. Of significant importance was the entrenchment of labour rights in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Section 23 of the Constitution is extensive in highlighting the importance to protect amongst others, the right of every trade union to organize and engage in collective bargaining, disclosure of information, restricted rights in domestic sector, rights to establish threshold of representativeness, organizational rights in collective agreements and disputes about organizational rights.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
- Authors: Dolopi, Nkosana
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) Arbitrators
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/15378 , vital:28236
- Description: Public Education like other sectors such as Health, International Relations, Finance, Local Government and Environmental Affairs that fall under Public Administration as well as business in private, factory and industrial institutions are embraced or characterized by the concept of employer and employee relationships. These relationships are not always wholesome and harmonious but are overshadowed by disputes and strikes which bring about paralysis and polarization of the operation of business and educational stability in public service and administration sectors as well as at learning institutions. These disputes arise from inter alia, disagreements regarding wage negotiations, unfair dismissals, unfair labour practice involving appointments, promotions and transfers, mutual interest, severance pay, automatically dismissals, operational requirements dismissals (both single and multiple), disclosure of information disputes, organizational rights disputes, agency shop disputes, picketing disputes, unfair discrimination disputes in terms of the Employment Equity of Act as amended, and disputes involving the enforcement of collective agreements or the non-compliance with the Basic Conditions of Employment Act and others. Whilst there are similar trends and patterns of disputes in all these sectors, they are, however, not only differ in intensity and rapid occurrence but also in how they are negotiated and settled because the work environments are different at the level of operation, administration and management. What is common in all disputes is that they are all conciliated and arbitrated by arbitrators at the Commission for Conciliation, and Arbitration (hereafter referred to as the CCMA), Education Labour Relations Council (ELRC), Private Resolution Agencies and the Labour Court. The Apartheid era administration had labour laws which dealt with these disputes, but were not progressive and effective in handling them. This placed a heavy burden on the new ANC led government to change the laws of the previous regime. Most of these changes happened in the labour relations and the labour policies. In view of the above situation, the new political dispensation that came into existence and operation in 1994 developed a new labour legislative framework with specific focus on the review of the collective bargaining dispensation. Of significant importance was the entrenchment of labour rights in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Section 23 of the Constitution is extensive in highlighting the importance to protect amongst others, the right of every trade union to organize and engage in collective bargaining, disclosure of information, restricted rights in domestic sector, rights to establish threshold of representativeness, organizational rights in collective agreements and disputes about organizational rights.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
Comparative perspectives on the doctrine of vicarious liability
- Authors: Roets, Maria Elizabeth
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Liability (Law) -- South Africa , Respondeat superior
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/3675 , vital:20452
- Description: The doctrine of vicarious liability provides justification for a deviation from the general rule that fault is an indispensable requirement to attach liability to an individual. The doctrine provides that an aggrieved party may hold an employer liable for the wrongful or delictual conduct of its employees. The South African legal system inherited the doctrine of vicarious liability from common-law and the doctrine is deeply rooted in English-law. The South African legal sphere is subject to constant transformation and as a result hereof, the common-law doctrine of vicarious liability should also be subjected to transformation. Uncertainty reigned in relation to whether the judiciary or the legislature carried the burden to develop the doctrine of vicarious liability in order to accommodate the needs of a modern society. The doctrine of vicarious liability is a universal concept and the transformation that the doctrine has undergone in other common-law countries could prove to be useful guidelines to assist with the development of the doctrine within the South African legal context. The doctrine places a tremendous burden on employers by providing that employers can be held accountable for the unlawful and delictual actions of its employees. One of the stumbling blocks that the South African judiciary had to overcome was to determine in which instances the liability of employers should be restricted in relation to the conduct of their employees. It is common cause that the doctrine, due to its onerous nature, cannot be regarded as absolute. Perhaps one of the most significant restrictions that has been placed on the application of the doctrine has been the fact that employers may only be held accountable for the wrongful conduct of its employees in instances where the employee has acted within the scope of his or her employment. The dividing line between acts committed within the scope of employment and acts committed outside of the scope of employment is a very fine line and the judiciary tend to tread carefully upon pronouncing on such matters. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 reiterates the importance of ensuring that the constitutional values of reasonableness and fairness are adhered to. An aggrieved party would be left with deep scars in the event that the individual is prohibited from instituting an action against an employer for harm or loss suffered as a result of a wrongful action of an employee of that employer. The employer would suffer prejudice in the event that the employer is held accountable for the wrongful conduct of an employee which is unrelated to the business of the employer. The answer to the conundrum lies in striking a balance between the prejudice suffered by the aggrieved party and the prejudice suffered by the employer. The aim of the judiciary should be to ensure that restrictions made to the application and interpretation of the doctrine of vicarious liability would be justifiable and reasonable in terms of the Constitution. The balancing of the interests of the employer and the balancing of the interests of the aggrieved parties are essential to ensure that justice prevails. It is common cause that no general test exist in the South African legal sphere in order to determine the liability of an employer for the wrongful conduct of its employees. Due to the complex nature of the doctrine of vicarious liability it can be averred that a general test would not address the technicalities of the doctrine. An important consideration to determine the liability of an employer is to establish whether a sufficiently close connection existed between the duties of the employee and the wrongful conduct of the employee. This factor can be considered as the “golden thread” that must be present to determine the liability of the employer. The doctrine of vicarious liability is a concept which has proved to be imperative in the South African legal sphere. Employers should be held accountable for the wrongful conduct of its employees, but simultaneously the constitutional values of reasonableness and fairness should be adhered to. Even though vicarious liability is an onerous concept for employers, justice would prevail if the values of the Constitution are applied religiously.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
- Authors: Roets, Maria Elizabeth
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Liability (Law) -- South Africa , Respondeat superior
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/3675 , vital:20452
- Description: The doctrine of vicarious liability provides justification for a deviation from the general rule that fault is an indispensable requirement to attach liability to an individual. The doctrine provides that an aggrieved party may hold an employer liable for the wrongful or delictual conduct of its employees. The South African legal system inherited the doctrine of vicarious liability from common-law and the doctrine is deeply rooted in English-law. The South African legal sphere is subject to constant transformation and as a result hereof, the common-law doctrine of vicarious liability should also be subjected to transformation. Uncertainty reigned in relation to whether the judiciary or the legislature carried the burden to develop the doctrine of vicarious liability in order to accommodate the needs of a modern society. The doctrine of vicarious liability is a universal concept and the transformation that the doctrine has undergone in other common-law countries could prove to be useful guidelines to assist with the development of the doctrine within the South African legal context. The doctrine places a tremendous burden on employers by providing that employers can be held accountable for the unlawful and delictual actions of its employees. One of the stumbling blocks that the South African judiciary had to overcome was to determine in which instances the liability of employers should be restricted in relation to the conduct of their employees. It is common cause that the doctrine, due to its onerous nature, cannot be regarded as absolute. Perhaps one of the most significant restrictions that has been placed on the application of the doctrine has been the fact that employers may only be held accountable for the wrongful conduct of its employees in instances where the employee has acted within the scope of his or her employment. The dividing line between acts committed within the scope of employment and acts committed outside of the scope of employment is a very fine line and the judiciary tend to tread carefully upon pronouncing on such matters. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 reiterates the importance of ensuring that the constitutional values of reasonableness and fairness are adhered to. An aggrieved party would be left with deep scars in the event that the individual is prohibited from instituting an action against an employer for harm or loss suffered as a result of a wrongful action of an employee of that employer. The employer would suffer prejudice in the event that the employer is held accountable for the wrongful conduct of an employee which is unrelated to the business of the employer. The answer to the conundrum lies in striking a balance between the prejudice suffered by the aggrieved party and the prejudice suffered by the employer. The aim of the judiciary should be to ensure that restrictions made to the application and interpretation of the doctrine of vicarious liability would be justifiable and reasonable in terms of the Constitution. The balancing of the interests of the employer and the balancing of the interests of the aggrieved parties are essential to ensure that justice prevails. It is common cause that no general test exist in the South African legal sphere in order to determine the liability of an employer for the wrongful conduct of its employees. Due to the complex nature of the doctrine of vicarious liability it can be averred that a general test would not address the technicalities of the doctrine. An important consideration to determine the liability of an employer is to establish whether a sufficiently close connection existed between the duties of the employee and the wrongful conduct of the employee. This factor can be considered as the “golden thread” that must be present to determine the liability of the employer. The doctrine of vicarious liability is a concept which has proved to be imperative in the South African legal sphere. Employers should be held accountable for the wrongful conduct of its employees, but simultaneously the constitutional values of reasonableness and fairness should be adhered to. Even though vicarious liability is an onerous concept for employers, justice would prevail if the values of the Constitution are applied religiously.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
Constitutionalism and separation of powers in South Africa after the promulgation of the 1996 constitution : a comparative perspective
- Authors: Ramatsekisa, Tsietsi Given
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Separation of powers -- South Africa Constitutional law -- South Africa Democracy -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , LLD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/12642 , vital:39295
- Description: Constitutionalism and separation of powers is the most dynamic topic worldwide. Montesquieu, the French philosopher is credited with the doctrine of separation of powers. Various countries adopted the doctrine and modified it, in order to fit their systems of governments. The reason behind is that there is no universally recognized model of separation of powers or one size fit all. Countries apply this doctrine differently in a fashion that fits their domestic laws and constitutional requirements. Montesquieu gave a classic exposition and the rationale for separation of powers in one of his well-celebrated work “The Spirit of Laws”. The concept of separation of powers emerged premised on the theory that the arms of state namely, the judiciary, the legislature and the executive, should operate within their providence without one interfering with the other. From the South African perspective, the Constitution of South Africa of 1996 requires separation of powers even though it is not explicitly so stated in the text. This research examines the unique South African model of separation of powers and how the courts have navigated through it from the time the Constitution was promulgated. It seeks to establish whether or not a South African model of separation of powers has come to the fore. The research further examines the problem of interference amongst the arms of state and mechanism of checks and balances which can be applied to prevent or minimise such interference. In doing so, the study pursued a desktop survey of primary and secondary materials, including scientific literature, legislation, courts’ jurisprudence, and official documents. A comparative perspective was also made in order to learn from the experiences of other jurisdictions where the doctrine is applied. The findings reveal that South Africa has a unique model of separation of powers. The model was learned and enriched from various foreign jurisdictions. The courts have contributed enormously to this model, which contrive to be fluid and living.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
- Authors: Ramatsekisa, Tsietsi Given
- Date: 2016
- Subjects: Separation of powers -- South Africa Constitutional law -- South Africa Democracy -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , LLD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/12642 , vital:39295
- Description: Constitutionalism and separation of powers is the most dynamic topic worldwide. Montesquieu, the French philosopher is credited with the doctrine of separation of powers. Various countries adopted the doctrine and modified it, in order to fit their systems of governments. The reason behind is that there is no universally recognized model of separation of powers or one size fit all. Countries apply this doctrine differently in a fashion that fits their domestic laws and constitutional requirements. Montesquieu gave a classic exposition and the rationale for separation of powers in one of his well-celebrated work “The Spirit of Laws”. The concept of separation of powers emerged premised on the theory that the arms of state namely, the judiciary, the legislature and the executive, should operate within their providence without one interfering with the other. From the South African perspective, the Constitution of South Africa of 1996 requires separation of powers even though it is not explicitly so stated in the text. This research examines the unique South African model of separation of powers and how the courts have navigated through it from the time the Constitution was promulgated. It seeks to establish whether or not a South African model of separation of powers has come to the fore. The research further examines the problem of interference amongst the arms of state and mechanism of checks and balances which can be applied to prevent or minimise such interference. In doing so, the study pursued a desktop survey of primary and secondary materials, including scientific literature, legislation, courts’ jurisprudence, and official documents. A comparative perspective was also made in order to learn from the experiences of other jurisdictions where the doctrine is applied. The findings reveal that South Africa has a unique model of separation of powers. The model was learned and enriched from various foreign jurisdictions. The courts have contributed enormously to this model, which contrive to be fluid and living.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016