- Title
- A comparison of the labour dispute resolution systems of South Africa and Swaziland
- Creator
- Majinda, Maseko Moses
- Subject
- Labor disputes -- South Africa
- Subject
- Labor disputes -- Swaziland
- Subject
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa
- Subject
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Swaziland
- Subject
- Mediation and conciliation, Industrial -- South Africa
- Subject
- Mediation and conciliation, Industrial -- Swaziland
- Date Issued
- 2007
- Date
- 2007
- Type
- Thesis
- Type
- Masters
- Type
- LLM
- Identifier
- vital:10204
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10948/833
- Identifier
- Labor disputes -- South Africa
- Identifier
- Labor disputes -- Swaziland
- Identifier
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa
- Identifier
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- Swaziland
- Identifier
- Mediation and conciliation, Industrial -- South Africa
- Identifier
- Mediation and conciliation, Industrial -- Swaziland
- Description
- History and Background: The history of statutory labour dispute resolution of South Africa dates back to 1909, when the Transvaal Disputes Prevention Act of 1909 was promulgated which applied only to the Transvaal. The Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924 established industrial councils and ad hoc conciliation boards and excluded black workers from the statutory definition of employee and this resulted in a dual industrial relations system that existed up to 1979. The history of statutory labour dispute resolution of Swaziland dates back to 1980 when the first Industrial Relations Act of 1980 was promulgated which established the first Industrial Court. Research Findings: The dispute resolution systems of South Africa and Swaziland contain both similarities and differences. Lessons for Swaziland include combining general and specific dispute resolution procedures, providing the right of a referring party to apply for condonation for late referral of a dispute, using conciliation-arbitration, making arbitration proceedings public hearings, influence of parties on the appointment of arbitrators, court adjudication, pre-dismissal arbitration, court adjudication by judges only, establishment of a constitutional court, full protection of protected strikes/ lockouts from interdicts, legalization of sympathy strikes, and removal of strikes/ lockout ballot. Lessons for South Africa include plural representation of parties at conciliation and arbitration, re-direction of some disputes by the Labour Court to the Commission for arbitration, reporting of labour disputes direct to the Head of State for determination.
- Format
- x, 111 leaves
- Format
- Publisher
- Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
- Publisher
- Faculty of Law
- Language
- English
- Rights
- Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
- Hits: 2675
- Visitors: 2883
- Downloads: 337
Collections
NMMU Department of Mercantile Law
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | SOURCEPDF | 728 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |