- Title
- The contribution of submerged macrophytes and macroalgae to nutrient cycling in the Great Brak Estuary
- Creator
- Human, Lucienne Ryno Daniel
- Subject
- Nutrient cycles -- South Africa -- Great Brak Estuary
- Subject
- Microalgae -- South Africa -- Great Brak Estuary
- Subject
- Estuarine ecology -- South Africa -- Great Brak Estuary
- Date Issued
- 2013
- Date
- 2013
- Type
- Thesis
- Type
- Doctoral
- Type
- PhD
- Identifier
- vital:10364
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1021102
- Description
- An ecological reserve study by the Department of Water Affairs on the Great Brak Estuary stated that there was a need to determine how much nitrogen and phosphorus was flowing through the estuary as well as how effective the macroalgae were at removing N and P. The objective of this study was to investigate the physico-chemical characteristics in the estuary and the influence of these on the submerged macrophytes and macroalgae. A nutrient budget for the estuary was developed in order to quantify the contribution of the submerged macrophytes and macroalgae relative to other contributing sources. The Wolwedans Dam located 3 km upstream from the estuary has reduced the amount of freshwater flow to the estuary by as much as 56 percent. The estuary has been allocated 2 x 106 m3 per annum of freshwater (ecological reserve) that is used to breach the mouth once or twice a year in spring or summer. Even though this water has been made available it is not sufficient to flush the estuary. Reduced flushing has led to an accumulation of organic matter and degradation in the water quality. Physico-chemical measurements between September 2010 and July 2012 showed that dissolved oxygen values were generally below 6 mg l-1. The average NH4+ concentration in the estuary was 7 μM and increased with depth to 12 μM at 2 m depths. Concentrations >45 μM were found in February and April 2011 at the 5 m deep hole at 3.4 km upstream. Negative correlations between dissolved oxygen and NH4+ during November 2010, February 2011, April 2011 and July 2011 (r = -0.68; -0.67; -0.63; -0.96) indicated that remineralisation of organic matter had occurred. Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) followed a similar trend to the NH4+ and was generally below 1 μM in the water column for most months, and had peaks at 1.0 km and 3.4 km in the bottom water. The abundance of submerged macrophytes and macroalgae below the N2 bridge were mostly influenced by mouth state and river inflow. During the closed phase the dominant macroalga Cladophora glomerata had an area cover ranging from 3000 to 6000 m2 while Zostera capensis and Ruppia cirrhosa covered an area of 2000 to 3500 m2 and 1500 to 2900 m2, respectively. After an artificial breach in February 2011, water drained out of the estuary leaving the alga stranded on the marshes and as the flood tide entered the macroalga was once again redistributed in the lower reaches. The alga utilised the available nutrients in the water column and expanded its area cover from 35000 m2 in February 2011 to 64000 m2 in March 2011. However, after the floods in June 2011, Cladophora glomerata had been washed out of the system while the submerged macrophytes responded positively extending their area cover. By comparing the artificial breach with the natural breach, and the effect on the estuary, an important observation was highlighted. Increasing the current allocated ecological reserve, and using a larger volume of water to breach the mouth artificially, would result in better scouring of sediment and associated organic matter out of the estuary. This would enable better oxygenation of the water column, reduce remineralisation and minimise algal blooms.
- Format
- xi, 182 pages
- Format
- Publisher
- Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
- Publisher
- Faculty of Science
- Language
- English
- Rights
- Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
- Hits: 658
- Visitors: 686
- Downloads: 172
Collections
NMMU School of BioMolecular and Chemical Sciences
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | SOURCEPDF | 4 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |