An exploration of whether using a global employment company could mitigate the South African tax risks in relation to inbound expatriates in multinational companies
- Authors: Pavey, Janet Gail
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Double taxation -- South Africa , Corporations, Foreign -- South Africa , Foreign workers -- Taxation -- South Africa , International business enterprises -- South Africa , Corporations -- Taxation -- South Africa , Value-added tax -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MCom
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/61368 , vital:28019
- Description: The main objective of this research paper was to explore whether a multinational company could use a global employment company to employ its expatriates to mitigate, simplify or limit the tax risk for that foreign company when sending expatriates to South Africa. To investigate this topic, an interpretive research approach was used, a doctrinal research methodology was followed, and inductive reasoning was applied. The documentary data used in this research was publicly available. Firstly, the meaning of the term “expatriate” was explored, together with the types of employment arrangements commonly used to employ this type of employee. The South African tax consequences that an inbound expatriate may create for a multinational company were then analysed. These tax consequences were applied to the common types of employment arrangements to determine what the South African tax impact of these arrangements is likely to be and which entity within a multinational group is likely to be affected. It was investigated whether using a foreign global employment company provides any tax simplification or tax mitigation strategies for the multinational company for expatriates inbound to South Africa. The primary conclusions of this research were that it was found that using a global employment company may only provide a tax benefit in South Africa in very specific circumstances: (i) where the economic employer of the expatriate is the South African entity; (ii) where flexibility is required to easily move the expatriate to other jurisdictions; and (iii) where there are multiple home-host country combinations that the multinational group needs to consider when moving its expatriates. It would appear that using a global employment company as the employment arrangement for an inbound expatriate to South Africa may have a fairly limited application if its purpose is to mitigate tax risks. In effect, a global employment company is likely to provide tax benefits only where it acts as an international labour broker for the multinational company of which it is a part.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Pavey, Janet Gail
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Double taxation -- South Africa , Corporations, Foreign -- South Africa , Foreign workers -- Taxation -- South Africa , International business enterprises -- South Africa , Corporations -- Taxation -- South Africa , Value-added tax -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MCom
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/61368 , vital:28019
- Description: The main objective of this research paper was to explore whether a multinational company could use a global employment company to employ its expatriates to mitigate, simplify or limit the tax risk for that foreign company when sending expatriates to South Africa. To investigate this topic, an interpretive research approach was used, a doctrinal research methodology was followed, and inductive reasoning was applied. The documentary data used in this research was publicly available. Firstly, the meaning of the term “expatriate” was explored, together with the types of employment arrangements commonly used to employ this type of employee. The South African tax consequences that an inbound expatriate may create for a multinational company were then analysed. These tax consequences were applied to the common types of employment arrangements to determine what the South African tax impact of these arrangements is likely to be and which entity within a multinational group is likely to be affected. It was investigated whether using a foreign global employment company provides any tax simplification or tax mitigation strategies for the multinational company for expatriates inbound to South Africa. The primary conclusions of this research were that it was found that using a global employment company may only provide a tax benefit in South Africa in very specific circumstances: (i) where the economic employer of the expatriate is the South African entity; (ii) where flexibility is required to easily move the expatriate to other jurisdictions; and (iii) where there are multiple home-host country combinations that the multinational group needs to consider when moving its expatriates. It would appear that using a global employment company as the employment arrangement for an inbound expatriate to South Africa may have a fairly limited application if its purpose is to mitigate tax risks. In effect, a global employment company is likely to provide tax benefits only where it acts as an international labour broker for the multinational company of which it is a part.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
An investigation into the tax consequences for individuals performing work abroad
- Authors: De Ponte, Celeste Lidia
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: South Africa. Income Tax Act, 1962 , Income tax -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Double taxation -- South Africa , International business enterprises -- Taxation -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MCom
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/141235 , vital:37955
- Description: This thesis considered the income tax implications for South African tax resident individuals who render services abroad. The research included an analysis of the impact that the amendment to the section 10(1)(o)(ii) exemption has on individuals rendering services abroad and companies who send their employees abroad. In doing so, this thesis sought to highlight the key factors for consideration, for both employers and individuals. A doctrinal methodology was applied, and an analysis was carried out of relevant tax legislation, commentary of experts in the field of tax law and the relevant case law of South Africa, the United Kingdom (UK), Australia and the United States of America (US), where relevant. It was established that residency is key to determining the tax liability of a person and has an impact on the relief mechanisms that are available where double taxation arises. In addition, the amendment to section 10(1)(o)(ii) was considered. It was concluded that when rendering services abroad, both the employer and employee need to consider the tax consequences that may arise and highlights the factors which may be relevant. The thesis illustrates that, whilst the R1 million exemption alleviates the double tax consequences to a certain extent, further guidance is needed as to how the R1 million threshold will be calculated.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: De Ponte, Celeste Lidia
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: South Africa. Income Tax Act, 1962 , Income tax -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Double taxation -- South Africa , International business enterprises -- Taxation -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MCom
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/141235 , vital:37955
- Description: This thesis considered the income tax implications for South African tax resident individuals who render services abroad. The research included an analysis of the impact that the amendment to the section 10(1)(o)(ii) exemption has on individuals rendering services abroad and companies who send their employees abroad. In doing so, this thesis sought to highlight the key factors for consideration, for both employers and individuals. A doctrinal methodology was applied, and an analysis was carried out of relevant tax legislation, commentary of experts in the field of tax law and the relevant case law of South Africa, the United Kingdom (UK), Australia and the United States of America (US), where relevant. It was established that residency is key to determining the tax liability of a person and has an impact on the relief mechanisms that are available where double taxation arises. In addition, the amendment to section 10(1)(o)(ii) was considered. It was concluded that when rendering services abroad, both the employer and employee need to consider the tax consequences that may arise and highlights the factors which may be relevant. The thesis illustrates that, whilst the R1 million exemption alleviates the double tax consequences to a certain extent, further guidance is needed as to how the R1 million threshold will be calculated.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »