- Title
- Male perspectives on gender violence in South Africa: the case of Nkonkobe municipal area
- Creator
- Danga, Talent
- Subject
- Abused wives -- South Africa
- Subject
- Abused women -- South Africa
- Subject
- Family violence -- South Africa
- Subject
- Women -- Crimes against -- South Africa
- Subject
- Family violence -- South Africa -- Research
- Subject
- Family violence -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Date Issued
- 2008
- Date
- 2008
- Type
- Thesis
- Type
- Masters
- Type
- M SW
- Identifier
- vital:11753
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10353/180
- Identifier
- Abused wives -- South Africa
- Identifier
- Abused women -- South Africa
- Identifier
- Family violence -- South Africa
- Identifier
- Women -- Crimes against -- South Africa
- Identifier
- Family violence -- South Africa -- Research
- Identifier
- Family violence -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Description
- The study explores the experiences of men who perpetrated violence against women in the domestic sphere. The study’s overarching concern is that violence has been largely seen as a women’s problem and not an issue that is central to men and yet in most cases are the perpetrators of this violence. Consequently, men have not been targeted in initiatives that curb domestic violence (Salo, 2005). It is in this frame of reference that this study saw it imperative to focus on the male perspective of gender violence. The study aims to find factors that contribute to male violence and in turn recommend practical and appropriate strategies of dealing with male violence perpetrators. The study drew its theoretical framework largely from the feminist theory, systems theory and the social learning theory in-order to gain insight into the different frameworks for making judgement about male violence against women. Feminists hold the view that, starting with people’s experiences is a powerful tool that provides the rational for their studies. The study was therefore qualitative in nature as it sought to gather men’s experiences of violent against their spouses; semi-structured interviews were utilized during data collection. A purposive sampling method was utilised to select ten men who were known to have perpetrated violence against their partners and five key informants with special knowledge on domestic violence. The research was conducted through the Department of Social Development in Alice in the Eastern Cape, which facilitated a trusting relationship between the researcher and its clients. The findings established that violence is used to maintain control and power over women. Men invoked hegemonic discourses as violence is employed as an instrument to suppress women, mostly in instances were women question their prerogatives and undermine their authority. It was evidenced that cultural practices such as ‘lobola’ (dowry) usually contribute to men’s use of violence. Most of the respondents understood violence from the physical dimension only, as violence was equated to beating and slapping. Added to that was the respondents’ inadequate understanding of domestic violence laws and legislation. The study also established that social service providers seem not to have concrete procedures and capacity to deal with perpetrators of domestic violence. In light of the problems discussed, the study recommends effective counseling and educational programs, policy improvement, capacitation of service providers and the criminal justice system and further research as strategies for dealing with male violence in the Nkonkobe District.
- Format
- ix, 158 leaves; 30 cm
- Format
- Publisher
- University of Fort Hare
- Publisher
- Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities
- Language
- English
- Rights
- University of Fort Hare
- Hits: 1505
- Visitors: 1611
- Downloads: 276
Collections
UFH Department of Social Work & Social Development
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | SOURCEPDF1 | 16 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download | |||
| View Details Download | SOURCEPDF2 | 681 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |