Labour dispute resolution in South Africa and Malawi: a comparative study
- Authors: Banda, Lisa Malopa
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa , Dispute resolution (Law) -- Malawi Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- Malawi Arbitration, Industrial -- South Africa Arbitration, Industrial -- Malawi
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/23891 , vital:30639
- Description: The aim of this treatise with the title Labour dispute resolution in South Africa and Malawi: A comparative study is to compare alternative dispute resolution between these two countries. It, furthermore, aims at drawing best practice to feed into each other. Another objective of this treatise is to learn by comparing and providing insight into the two countries’ alternative dispute resolution systems. This treatise comprises five chapters, each dealing with different aspects of alternative dispute resolution and an inter-country comparison. Chapter 1 introduces the concept of alternative dispute resolution and explains different types of methodologies in South Africa and Malawi in this regard. It also describes the different external alternative dispute resolution systems. In any conflicting situation, there is no guarantee that disputes will be resolved successfully, hence, one needs to apply different methodologies to try to resolve disputes, such as an alternative dispute resolution. Chapter 2 examines the Alternative Dispute Resolution System of South Africa and consists of three parts. Part 1 focuses on the historical legislative framework, Part 2 examines labour dispute resolution, as provided for in the Labour Relations Act of 1995 and Part 3 analyses the advantages and disadvantages of alternative dispute resolution systems in South Africa. Alternative dispute resolution has become popular and prominent across the globe as it ensures privacy and emphasises a cooperative and constructive way forward, which carries with it the possibility of improving employment relations in the long term. Chapter 3 provides an outline of Malawi’s relevant dispute resolution legal framework, regulated methodologies and system. Chapter 4 concentrates on evaluating and comparing alternative dispute resolution systems in South Africa with that of Malawi and later evaluates efficiencies, the effectiveness and challenges of alternative dispute resolution, which arise from the earlier comparison, with the aim of determining whether or not there is a need for reform of each country’s alternative dispute resolution system. The delivery of alternative dispute resolution systems can take place in a number of different settings, such as an employment tribunal, under the auspice of the Ministry of Labour, dispute resolution boards or a private dispute resolution. However, for the purpose of this study, the main mechanisms that will be analysed are arbitration, conciliation and mediation. Conclusions and recommendations are discussed in Chapter 5, which briefly summarises this study and synthesises the analysis of the South African and Malawian alternative dispute resolution system. Recommendations for legislation, methodologies and systems are also made.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Banda, Lisa Malopa
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa , Dispute resolution (Law) -- Malawi Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- Malawi Arbitration, Industrial -- South Africa Arbitration, Industrial -- Malawi
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/23891 , vital:30639
- Description: The aim of this treatise with the title Labour dispute resolution in South Africa and Malawi: A comparative study is to compare alternative dispute resolution between these two countries. It, furthermore, aims at drawing best practice to feed into each other. Another objective of this treatise is to learn by comparing and providing insight into the two countries’ alternative dispute resolution systems. This treatise comprises five chapters, each dealing with different aspects of alternative dispute resolution and an inter-country comparison. Chapter 1 introduces the concept of alternative dispute resolution and explains different types of methodologies in South Africa and Malawi in this regard. It also describes the different external alternative dispute resolution systems. In any conflicting situation, there is no guarantee that disputes will be resolved successfully, hence, one needs to apply different methodologies to try to resolve disputes, such as an alternative dispute resolution. Chapter 2 examines the Alternative Dispute Resolution System of South Africa and consists of three parts. Part 1 focuses on the historical legislative framework, Part 2 examines labour dispute resolution, as provided for in the Labour Relations Act of 1995 and Part 3 analyses the advantages and disadvantages of alternative dispute resolution systems in South Africa. Alternative dispute resolution has become popular and prominent across the globe as it ensures privacy and emphasises a cooperative and constructive way forward, which carries with it the possibility of improving employment relations in the long term. Chapter 3 provides an outline of Malawi’s relevant dispute resolution legal framework, regulated methodologies and system. Chapter 4 concentrates on evaluating and comparing alternative dispute resolution systems in South Africa with that of Malawi and later evaluates efficiencies, the effectiveness and challenges of alternative dispute resolution, which arise from the earlier comparison, with the aim of determining whether or not there is a need for reform of each country’s alternative dispute resolution system. The delivery of alternative dispute resolution systems can take place in a number of different settings, such as an employment tribunal, under the auspice of the Ministry of Labour, dispute resolution boards or a private dispute resolution. However, for the purpose of this study, the main mechanisms that will be analysed are arbitration, conciliation and mediation. Conclusions and recommendations are discussed in Chapter 5, which briefly summarises this study and synthesises the analysis of the South African and Malawian alternative dispute resolution system. Recommendations for legislation, methodologies and systems are also made.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Labour rights of fishers in Namibia
- Hamukuaya, Nghililewanga Hashali
- Authors: Hamukuaya, Nghililewanga Hashali
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- Namibia , Fishing -- law and legislation -- Namibia Employee rights -- Namibia Human rights -- Namibia
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/30061 , vital:30815
- Description: Fishers make an important contribution to the global economy and add value to a country’s gross domestic product. Their contribution is even more important in countries such as Namibia that rely heavily on the fishing industry as a source of income. The working conditions of fishers have recently come under scrutiny as a result of poor labour standards when compared to employees ashore. A background of the working conditions of fishers is provided illustrating the unique working conditions of the fishing industry. After that the international standards, namely those of the United Nations and the International Labour Organisation (hereinafter referred to as “the ILO”), are discussed and the challenges in the regulations of the condition of employment of fishers are pointed out. The ILO recently adopted the Work in Fishing Convention (hereinafter referred to as “the WIFC”) in 2007, which is the primary instrument applicable to fishers’ conditions of employment. Namibia has not ratified the Convention and, as a result, it has no legal obligation to comply with the standards it sets. The international standards were tested against the national legislation of Namibia. This was done to determine the extent of Namibia’s compliance with those standards. The dissertation revealed that, if Namibia were to immediately ratify the Convention it would not conform with the standards and, as a result, would be in breach of its international obligation. The dissertation takes a step further by comparing the approach taken in regulating the conditions of employment in Namibia to the approach taken in South Africa. The purpose of the comparison is to determine the lessons Namibia can learn, if any, to improve the regulation of the condition of employment for its fishers. The dissertation 7 reveals that there are lessons Namibia can learn from South Africa to improve the conditions of employment of the fishers. These lessons relate to introducing a bargaining council and, where necessary, statutory councils for the fishing industry. The introduction of a bargaining council and statutory councils would give organisations such as trade unions more power to negotiate a general standard across multiple sectors within the fishing industry. The standards that are negotiating could incorporate the standards provided in the WIFC even though Namibia has not ratified the convention.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Hamukuaya, Nghililewanga Hashali
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- Namibia , Fishing -- law and legislation -- Namibia Employee rights -- Namibia Human rights -- Namibia
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/30061 , vital:30815
- Description: Fishers make an important contribution to the global economy and add value to a country’s gross domestic product. Their contribution is even more important in countries such as Namibia that rely heavily on the fishing industry as a source of income. The working conditions of fishers have recently come under scrutiny as a result of poor labour standards when compared to employees ashore. A background of the working conditions of fishers is provided illustrating the unique working conditions of the fishing industry. After that the international standards, namely those of the United Nations and the International Labour Organisation (hereinafter referred to as “the ILO”), are discussed and the challenges in the regulations of the condition of employment of fishers are pointed out. The ILO recently adopted the Work in Fishing Convention (hereinafter referred to as “the WIFC”) in 2007, which is the primary instrument applicable to fishers’ conditions of employment. Namibia has not ratified the Convention and, as a result, it has no legal obligation to comply with the standards it sets. The international standards were tested against the national legislation of Namibia. This was done to determine the extent of Namibia’s compliance with those standards. The dissertation revealed that, if Namibia were to immediately ratify the Convention it would not conform with the standards and, as a result, would be in breach of its international obligation. The dissertation takes a step further by comparing the approach taken in regulating the conditions of employment in Namibia to the approach taken in South Africa. The purpose of the comparison is to determine the lessons Namibia can learn, if any, to improve the regulation of the condition of employment for its fishers. The dissertation 7 reveals that there are lessons Namibia can learn from South Africa to improve the conditions of employment of the fishers. These lessons relate to introducing a bargaining council and, where necessary, statutory councils for the fishing industry. The introduction of a bargaining council and statutory councils would give organisations such as trade unions more power to negotiate a general standard across multiple sectors within the fishing industry. The standards that are negotiating could incorporate the standards provided in the WIFC even though Namibia has not ratified the convention.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Non-standard employment in terms of the labour relations act
- Authors: Tatchell, Veronique
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , South Africa -- Labour Relations Act, 1995 , Flexible work arrangements -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49027 , vital:41594
- Description: Historically, employers utilised non-standard or atypical forms of employment in order to avoid statutory obligations in respect of these employees, and in turn justify differential treatment of said employees.1 As a result, non-standard employees were not on the same footing as their permanent counterparts. They were not remunerated on the same level, were not privy to advancement and training opportunities, and did not enjoy a sense of job security due to the ease at which their employment could be terminated, rendering them a vulnerable class of workers.2 There was pandemonium in the employment sphere of society due to the abusive practices faced by employees employed in terms of Temporary Employment Services, this was accompanied by a call to ban labour broking. The legislature, while acknowledging the important role that this form of employment plays in the labour market and broader economy, opted for increased regulation of this and other types of non-standard employment; instead of an outright ban. As a result thereof, the Labour Relations Act3 was amended by the Labour Relations Amendment Act,4 with a view of improving the regulation and protection of employees engaged in these forms of non-standard or atypical employment. This study seeks to determine whether the amendments have achieved the purpose of enhancing the job security of these employees.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Tatchell, Veronique
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , South Africa -- Labour Relations Act, 1995 , Flexible work arrangements -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49027 , vital:41594
- Description: Historically, employers utilised non-standard or atypical forms of employment in order to avoid statutory obligations in respect of these employees, and in turn justify differential treatment of said employees.1 As a result, non-standard employees were not on the same footing as their permanent counterparts. They were not remunerated on the same level, were not privy to advancement and training opportunities, and did not enjoy a sense of job security due to the ease at which their employment could be terminated, rendering them a vulnerable class of workers.2 There was pandemonium in the employment sphere of society due to the abusive practices faced by employees employed in terms of Temporary Employment Services, this was accompanied by a call to ban labour broking. The legislature, while acknowledging the important role that this form of employment plays in the labour market and broader economy, opted for increased regulation of this and other types of non-standard employment; instead of an outright ban. As a result thereof, the Labour Relations Act3 was amended by the Labour Relations Amendment Act,4 with a view of improving the regulation and protection of employees engaged in these forms of non-standard or atypical employment. This study seeks to determine whether the amendments have achieved the purpose of enhancing the job security of these employees.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Bail applications in Nigeria and South Africa
- Authors: Babalola, Abdulateef Taiwo
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Bail -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47325 , vital:39847
- Description: Between the point of arrest and conviction, an accused person has a right to be released on bail based on his or her Constitutional right to liberty as well as the right to be presumed innocent. To grant bail to an accused person serves as a form of contract of insurance or a guarantee that if the accused person is released pending the determination of the case against him, he will not frustrate the course of justice and will appear at a later date to face trial. The essence of bail is to allow the accused person enjoy his right to liberty pending the determination of the criminal charge if the interest of justice will permit for his or her release. This study aims at comparing bail proceedings in both the Nigerian and South African criminal justice systems. The constitutions of both jurisdictions make provision for bail, as well as the Administration of Criminal Justice Act applicable in Nigeria and the Criminal Procedure Act which is applicable in South Africa. By comparing both jurisdictions, the similarities and differences that exist between both systems will become evident, which makes them unique and distinct of each other. During the course of this study, it will be discovered that the Nigerian bail procedure do not meet up to international standards in protecting the right to personal liberty of accused persons. It is believed that the recommendations that will be suggested in this study will improve the Nigerian bail procedure and make it more effective and efficient.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Babalola, Abdulateef Taiwo
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Bail -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47325 , vital:39847
- Description: Between the point of arrest and conviction, an accused person has a right to be released on bail based on his or her Constitutional right to liberty as well as the right to be presumed innocent. To grant bail to an accused person serves as a form of contract of insurance or a guarantee that if the accused person is released pending the determination of the case against him, he will not frustrate the course of justice and will appear at a later date to face trial. The essence of bail is to allow the accused person enjoy his right to liberty pending the determination of the criminal charge if the interest of justice will permit for his or her release. This study aims at comparing bail proceedings in both the Nigerian and South African criminal justice systems. The constitutions of both jurisdictions make provision for bail, as well as the Administration of Criminal Justice Act applicable in Nigeria and the Criminal Procedure Act which is applicable in South Africa. By comparing both jurisdictions, the similarities and differences that exist between both systems will become evident, which makes them unique and distinct of each other. During the course of this study, it will be discovered that the Nigerian bail procedure do not meet up to international standards in protecting the right to personal liberty of accused persons. It is believed that the recommendations that will be suggested in this study will improve the Nigerian bail procedure and make it more effective and efficient.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Employee pension and provident fund rights
- Authors: Richard, Makhado Fhatuwani
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Pension funds -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Pension trusts -- South Africa Pensions -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/35156 , vital:33642
- Description: Ideally, every employee is required to retire at some stage in life. Some retire at a relatively early age, whilst others work for as long as is possible. The generally accepted retirement ages are 55, 60 or 65, but vary from company to company as stipulated in the specific company's provident or pension fund rules or policy. Once retired, an individual would rely on social insurance as a source of income in the form of pension or a provident fund. Social insurance, in this regard, refers to the earned benefits of employees and is often linked to formal employment. South Africa, as a middle-income developing country, has incorporated such elements into its social security system. The main aim of a pension or provident fund is to provide benefits for its members when they retire from employment, retrenched, unable to work due to illness and for family in the case a member dies while still working. These forms of social security are key to people’s survival and are referred to as safety nets. benefits. Participation on a voluntary basis by the self-employed is allowed but the take-up has been low Employees’ pension and provident rights under a pension or provident scheme do not arise only under the trusts of the scheme but also as contractual terms of the employment relationship between the employer and its employees. This often takes effect on the date of taking up employment, or on entering into an agreement with the employer. Employment law covers all rights and obligations within the employee employer relationship and covers a range of legal issues such as discrimination, wrongful termination, wages and taxation. Many of these issues are governed by the applicable law. Although the South African retirement fund system is in many respects financially sound and well regulated, several individuals still reach their retirement age with inadequate savings. This occurs for several reasons. For many people, during their working life, the build-up of savings is disrupted, or the costs associated with retirement fund provisioning are relatively high. This problem is not only grave for some workers in the formal sector, but largely for those in the rapidly increasing informal sector. Majority of people still lack effective access to an affordable retirement funding vehicle, for the most part, are completely excluded from social protection schemes, social insurance schemes. The South African retirement fund industry has been heavily influenced by a racially divided past and the parallel existence of developed and emerging components of the economy. In the past, racially discriminatory exclusion from the pension fund or provident fund membership was prevalent. In many cases it was indirect discrimination based on job categorisation, such as the distinction between weekly paid and monthly paid staff. Where the staff complement was racially stratified, people were excluded from membership on the grounds of race. Discrimination in the workplace can deny individuals opportunities and thereby deprive society of what those individuals can and could contribute. This has unfortunately been the case in South Africa’s history, the administration of pension and provident funds being one of many examples.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Richard, Makhado Fhatuwani
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Pension funds -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Pension trusts -- South Africa Pensions -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/35156 , vital:33642
- Description: Ideally, every employee is required to retire at some stage in life. Some retire at a relatively early age, whilst others work for as long as is possible. The generally accepted retirement ages are 55, 60 or 65, but vary from company to company as stipulated in the specific company's provident or pension fund rules or policy. Once retired, an individual would rely on social insurance as a source of income in the form of pension or a provident fund. Social insurance, in this regard, refers to the earned benefits of employees and is often linked to formal employment. South Africa, as a middle-income developing country, has incorporated such elements into its social security system. The main aim of a pension or provident fund is to provide benefits for its members when they retire from employment, retrenched, unable to work due to illness and for family in the case a member dies while still working. These forms of social security are key to people’s survival and are referred to as safety nets. benefits. Participation on a voluntary basis by the self-employed is allowed but the take-up has been low Employees’ pension and provident rights under a pension or provident scheme do not arise only under the trusts of the scheme but also as contractual terms of the employment relationship between the employer and its employees. This often takes effect on the date of taking up employment, or on entering into an agreement with the employer. Employment law covers all rights and obligations within the employee employer relationship and covers a range of legal issues such as discrimination, wrongful termination, wages and taxation. Many of these issues are governed by the applicable law. Although the South African retirement fund system is in many respects financially sound and well regulated, several individuals still reach their retirement age with inadequate savings. This occurs for several reasons. For many people, during their working life, the build-up of savings is disrupted, or the costs associated with retirement fund provisioning are relatively high. This problem is not only grave for some workers in the formal sector, but largely for those in the rapidly increasing informal sector. Majority of people still lack effective access to an affordable retirement funding vehicle, for the most part, are completely excluded from social protection schemes, social insurance schemes. The South African retirement fund industry has been heavily influenced by a racially divided past and the parallel existence of developed and emerging components of the economy. In the past, racially discriminatory exclusion from the pension fund or provident fund membership was prevalent. In many cases it was indirect discrimination based on job categorisation, such as the distinction between weekly paid and monthly paid staff. Where the staff complement was racially stratified, people were excluded from membership on the grounds of race. Discrimination in the workplace can deny individuals opportunities and thereby deprive society of what those individuals can and could contribute. This has unfortunately been the case in South Africa’s history, the administration of pension and provident funds being one of many examples.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Ratifying the ILO convention no. 102 (social security minimum standards convention, 1952) by South Africa
- Authors: Xakaxa, Xoliswa
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Social security -- South Africa , Social security -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation, International
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/36452 , vital:33945
- Description: Twenty-three (23) years have elapsed since South Africa parted ways with the apartheid system. Nevertheless, poverty, inequality, and unemployment pose the greatest threat to human dignity and social cohesion. Section 27 (1) (c) of the Constitution obligates the state to develop a comprehensive social security system. It affirms the universal right to access social security, including appropriate social assistance for those unable to support themselves and their dependants. It orders the state to take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of these rights. The underlying normative commitment of social security is the improvement of the quality of life of the population by promoting economic or material equality. The study provides a general overview of the system of Social Security in South Africa as a Member State of the ILO. In particular, the study underscores that South Africa has not ratified ILO Convention No. 102 Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 and other Conventions relevant to Social Security. The study examines the need to ratify the said Convention in order to receive extensive coverage that would, among other benefits receive guarantees for a well-established system and thereby potentially reduce poverty. The Constitution is the supreme law of the country, it clearly stipulates that when interpreting, and applying the statutes international law must be considered. The study illuminates the significant benefits the country would receive from ratifying Convention No. 102.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Xakaxa, Xoliswa
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Social security -- South Africa , Social security -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation, International
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/36452 , vital:33945
- Description: Twenty-three (23) years have elapsed since South Africa parted ways with the apartheid system. Nevertheless, poverty, inequality, and unemployment pose the greatest threat to human dignity and social cohesion. Section 27 (1) (c) of the Constitution obligates the state to develop a comprehensive social security system. It affirms the universal right to access social security, including appropriate social assistance for those unable to support themselves and their dependants. It orders the state to take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of these rights. The underlying normative commitment of social security is the improvement of the quality of life of the population by promoting economic or material equality. The study provides a general overview of the system of Social Security in South Africa as a Member State of the ILO. In particular, the study underscores that South Africa has not ratified ILO Convention No. 102 Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 and other Conventions relevant to Social Security. The study examines the need to ratify the said Convention in order to receive extensive coverage that would, among other benefits receive guarantees for a well-established system and thereby potentially reduce poverty. The Constitution is the supreme law of the country, it clearly stipulates that when interpreting, and applying the statutes international law must be considered. The study illuminates the significant benefits the country would receive from ratifying Convention No. 102.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Trade union liability for unprotected strike action and violence in furtherance thereof
- Authors: Tshentu, Nolitha
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Strikes and lockouts -- South Africa Strikes and lockouts Labor unions -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/43743 , vital:37040
- Description: The right to strike is a constitutional right and is integral to the process of collective bargaining. Collective bargaining tends to focus on sensitive issues like wages, as well as terms and conditions of employment. Resolving these issues often requires compromise from both parties through the collective bargaining process. However, in the earlier stages of labour law there was no collective bargaining. There was a master and servant relationship, there was no compromise, and it was limited only to the individual contract of hire. As much as a strikes are a constitutional right and are recognised by the law, they don’t seem to happen without violence and destruction of property. There are some views that view violence as being synonymous with strikes in South Africa. The legal framework is very clear and supports the right to strike, and emphasises that any demonstrations and picketing should be peaceful. Section 68(1)(b) of the LRA should be a solution to the violence that comes with unprotected strikes. This section refers to just and equitable compensation, it does not equate to full loss suffered and it also depends on the merits of each case. The ILO’s approach to illegitimate actions linked to strikes should be proportionate to the offence of fault committed. The Constitution saw South Africa making a clean break with the past. The Constitution is focused on ensuring human dignity, the achievement of equality and advancement of human rights and freedoms.1 According to the Constitution the right to assemble and demonstrate must be peaceful. According to Grogan the right is now seen as a necessary adjunct to collective bargaining and is constitutionally entrenched.2 The LRA supports participation in protected strikes. In cases of unprotected strikes allows employers to interdict that particular strike, sue for compensation in cases of damages and losses and also to discipline employees. The Regulations of the Gatherings Act (RGA) was introduced to reconcile the right of assemblers with the state’s interest in maintaining public order. Section 11 of this Act seeks to deter violence and discourages violation of others by ensuring that organisers are held liable. The LRA holds the trade union and its members liable for the damages and violence that is accompanied by unprotected strikes. Section 68(1)(b) seeks just and equitable compensation for damages caused during an unprotected strike. However even though there is recourse for the damages suffered during the protest, unprotected strikes still continue and the violence is still part of the strikes. It is proper to ask if this section is really serving what it was intended. Surely the intention of this section was to deter strikers from embarking on unprotected strikes as the LRA is very clear on the procedure to be followed before a strike action takes place. Another intention of this section is to curb the violence during strikes. This section seems to have fallen on deaf ears.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Tshentu, Nolitha
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Strikes and lockouts -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Strikes and lockouts -- South Africa Strikes and lockouts Labor unions -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/43743 , vital:37040
- Description: The right to strike is a constitutional right and is integral to the process of collective bargaining. Collective bargaining tends to focus on sensitive issues like wages, as well as terms and conditions of employment. Resolving these issues often requires compromise from both parties through the collective bargaining process. However, in the earlier stages of labour law there was no collective bargaining. There was a master and servant relationship, there was no compromise, and it was limited only to the individual contract of hire. As much as a strikes are a constitutional right and are recognised by the law, they don’t seem to happen without violence and destruction of property. There are some views that view violence as being synonymous with strikes in South Africa. The legal framework is very clear and supports the right to strike, and emphasises that any demonstrations and picketing should be peaceful. Section 68(1)(b) of the LRA should be a solution to the violence that comes with unprotected strikes. This section refers to just and equitable compensation, it does not equate to full loss suffered and it also depends on the merits of each case. The ILO’s approach to illegitimate actions linked to strikes should be proportionate to the offence of fault committed. The Constitution saw South Africa making a clean break with the past. The Constitution is focused on ensuring human dignity, the achievement of equality and advancement of human rights and freedoms.1 According to the Constitution the right to assemble and demonstrate must be peaceful. According to Grogan the right is now seen as a necessary adjunct to collective bargaining and is constitutionally entrenched.2 The LRA supports participation in protected strikes. In cases of unprotected strikes allows employers to interdict that particular strike, sue for compensation in cases of damages and losses and also to discipline employees. The Regulations of the Gatherings Act (RGA) was introduced to reconcile the right of assemblers with the state’s interest in maintaining public order. Section 11 of this Act seeks to deter violence and discourages violation of others by ensuring that organisers are held liable. The LRA holds the trade union and its members liable for the damages and violence that is accompanied by unprotected strikes. Section 68(1)(b) seeks just and equitable compensation for damages caused during an unprotected strike. However even though there is recourse for the damages suffered during the protest, unprotected strikes still continue and the violence is still part of the strikes. It is proper to ask if this section is really serving what it was intended. Surely the intention of this section was to deter strikers from embarking on unprotected strikes as the LRA is very clear on the procedure to be followed before a strike action takes place. Another intention of this section is to curb the violence during strikes. This section seems to have fallen on deaf ears.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Rethinking minimum sentence Legislation
- Authors: Goliath, Alphonso Augustine
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Sentences (Criminal procedure) -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47370 , vital:39851
- Description: The harsh mandatory minimum sentences, introduced by the Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997, seemed like a good idea to politicians, as a means of countering the escalating crime rate experienced when South Africa transitioned to its new democracy, and to appease the public that something is being done about the issue. The plan was that everyone who committed the same crime would receive the same guaranteed sentence. Judges and Magistrates can only deviate from the predetermined sentences if they are satisfied that substantial and compelling circumstances exist, which would justify the imposition of a lesser sentence, limiting their flexibility. By doing so sentences would always be fair, politicians could be seen to be tough on crime and everyone would be satisfied. Unfortunately, this is not how minimum sentencing legislation turned out to be, as research has shown that it is not a deterrent for crime in South Africa or anywhere else. Instead of achieving consistency in sentencing, it worsens inconsistencies and disparities. With minimum sentencing legislation, the sentence for drug trafficking and murder is the same. Instinctively, human beings want to be safe and secure, but to lock up non-violent people for years will not make people feel safer. Due to the increased number of people serving life sentences and because non-violent offences are incorporated in the minimum sentencing legislation, our prison population has increased rapidly. Minimum sentencing legislation has several negative consequences, at a huge cost to South Africans, of which overcrowding of prisons is the most significant. Courts were tolerant with the poor language of the minimum sentencing legislation, as it was only supposed to be a temporary emergency measure against the high escalating violent crime experienced in South Africa post-1994. Since this Legislation became permanent in 2007, it is considerably different from the one considered in S v Dodo and a constitutional challenge is justifiable. With reference to the above, this research will reveal that minimum sentencing legislation did not deliver the desired results South Africa was hoping for and it is a vii major contributor to South Africa’s social retrograde. The rethinking of minimum sentencing legislation becomes imperative, bearing in mind that South Africa has previously researched sentencing alternatives at its disposal.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Goliath, Alphonso Augustine
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Sentences (Criminal procedure) -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/47370 , vital:39851
- Description: The harsh mandatory minimum sentences, introduced by the Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997, seemed like a good idea to politicians, as a means of countering the escalating crime rate experienced when South Africa transitioned to its new democracy, and to appease the public that something is being done about the issue. The plan was that everyone who committed the same crime would receive the same guaranteed sentence. Judges and Magistrates can only deviate from the predetermined sentences if they are satisfied that substantial and compelling circumstances exist, which would justify the imposition of a lesser sentence, limiting their flexibility. By doing so sentences would always be fair, politicians could be seen to be tough on crime and everyone would be satisfied. Unfortunately, this is not how minimum sentencing legislation turned out to be, as research has shown that it is not a deterrent for crime in South Africa or anywhere else. Instead of achieving consistency in sentencing, it worsens inconsistencies and disparities. With minimum sentencing legislation, the sentence for drug trafficking and murder is the same. Instinctively, human beings want to be safe and secure, but to lock up non-violent people for years will not make people feel safer. Due to the increased number of people serving life sentences and because non-violent offences are incorporated in the minimum sentencing legislation, our prison population has increased rapidly. Minimum sentencing legislation has several negative consequences, at a huge cost to South Africans, of which overcrowding of prisons is the most significant. Courts were tolerant with the poor language of the minimum sentencing legislation, as it was only supposed to be a temporary emergency measure against the high escalating violent crime experienced in South Africa post-1994. Since this Legislation became permanent in 2007, it is considerably different from the one considered in S v Dodo and a constitutional challenge is justifiable. With reference to the above, this research will reveal that minimum sentencing legislation did not deliver the desired results South Africa was hoping for and it is a vii major contributor to South Africa’s social retrograde. The rethinking of minimum sentencing legislation becomes imperative, bearing in mind that South Africa has previously researched sentencing alternatives at its disposal.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Labour dispute resolution in Uganda
- Chabo, Godsent, Ndimurwimo, Leah A
- Authors: Chabo, Godsent , Ndimurwimo, Leah A
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) -- Uganda , Labor disputes -- Uganda Arbitration, Industrial -- Uganda Industrial relations -- Uganda
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48960 , vital:41566
- Description: The dissertation examines the Ugandan labour dispute resolution system by undertaking an analysis of international labour standards and a case study of South Africa’s labour dispute system. The study pronounces the legislative provisions of the Employment Act and Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act that exist for the effective and efficient resolution of labour disputes through an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system. The study contends for the provision of a proactive and expeditious dispute resolution system that helps to resolve labour disputes in the most effective and efficient manner, without necessarily having to resort to the courts. The dissertation further examines the provisions of relevant international labour standards on labour dispute resolution to ascertain their adequacy as part frameworks that apply to Uganda’s obligation to provide ADR systems that respond to the needs of the labour relations community. The study contends that ratifying particular ILO conventions creates obligations upon a country to comply and apply provisions of these conventions in national legislation. It is further argued that by having ratified those international labour standards that provide for ADR, Uganda assumes specific obligations under international law, enjoining the country to provide the required ADR system of conciliation and arbitration, which is reliable and trusted by the countries citizens. A case study of South Africa is adopted with the primary focus on whether Uganda can learn from South African’s ADR system which is arguably more effective and efficient. South Africa has a labour dispute resolution system that has influenced majority of the Southern African Development Community (SADAC) law, hence prompting this study to borrow its ADR system predominantly the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). Despite the differences between Uganda and South Africa, the study also indicates fundamental similarities. Preferably, disputes should be resolved at conciliation level, resulting in the minority of disputes being referred to arbitration or the Industrial Court. This is far from the reality of the situation in Uganda. The study acknowledges that the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act and Employment Act have put up provisions to establish a fast and effective labour dispute system, however, the gap exists at implementing these effective provisions in the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act and the Employment Act. These lacunae in implementation make the attainment of an effective and efficient labour dispute resolution difficult. For this reason, the author proposes several remedial interventions in line with international labour standards and lessons from South Africa’s system that look to the future and the continued provision of fast, effective, and user-friendly ADR services. For Uganda to solve successfully apply these remedies, a strong political will as well as concerted efforts from all role players in the labour relations community is required.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Chabo, Godsent , Ndimurwimo, Leah A
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Dispute resolution (Law) -- Uganda , Labor disputes -- Uganda Arbitration, Industrial -- Uganda Industrial relations -- Uganda
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48960 , vital:41566
- Description: The dissertation examines the Ugandan labour dispute resolution system by undertaking an analysis of international labour standards and a case study of South Africa’s labour dispute system. The study pronounces the legislative provisions of the Employment Act and Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act that exist for the effective and efficient resolution of labour disputes through an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system. The study contends for the provision of a proactive and expeditious dispute resolution system that helps to resolve labour disputes in the most effective and efficient manner, without necessarily having to resort to the courts. The dissertation further examines the provisions of relevant international labour standards on labour dispute resolution to ascertain their adequacy as part frameworks that apply to Uganda’s obligation to provide ADR systems that respond to the needs of the labour relations community. The study contends that ratifying particular ILO conventions creates obligations upon a country to comply and apply provisions of these conventions in national legislation. It is further argued that by having ratified those international labour standards that provide for ADR, Uganda assumes specific obligations under international law, enjoining the country to provide the required ADR system of conciliation and arbitration, which is reliable and trusted by the countries citizens. A case study of South Africa is adopted with the primary focus on whether Uganda can learn from South African’s ADR system which is arguably more effective and efficient. South Africa has a labour dispute resolution system that has influenced majority of the Southern African Development Community (SADAC) law, hence prompting this study to borrow its ADR system predominantly the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). Despite the differences between Uganda and South Africa, the study also indicates fundamental similarities. Preferably, disputes should be resolved at conciliation level, resulting in the minority of disputes being referred to arbitration or the Industrial Court. This is far from the reality of the situation in Uganda. The study acknowledges that the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act and Employment Act have put up provisions to establish a fast and effective labour dispute system, however, the gap exists at implementing these effective provisions in the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) Act and the Employment Act. These lacunae in implementation make the attainment of an effective and efficient labour dispute resolution difficult. For this reason, the author proposes several remedial interventions in line with international labour standards and lessons from South Africa’s system that look to the future and the continued provision of fast, effective, and user-friendly ADR services. For Uganda to solve successfully apply these remedies, a strong political will as well as concerted efforts from all role players in the labour relations community is required.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Legal position of TES employees
- Authors: Sidloyi, Sicelo
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Temporary employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Temporary help services -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/43478 , vital:36896
- Description: This paper focuses on the legal position of employees of a Temporary Employment Services (hereinafter referred to as “TES”), also referred to as a labour broker defined as a person or entity that provides workers to others, (their clients) to perform duties for the benefit of the client for compensation. This tripartite relationship is established by an employment contract between the employee and the TES (this forms the basis of the employment relationship) and a commercial contract between the TES and the client. This relationship is regulated by S198 of the Labour Relations Act1 (hereinafter referred to as “LRA”). This section provides protection to employees of a labour broker, where before it, such protection did not exist. This section along with its subsections will be discussed in length in this paper and this section will be criticized and its shortcomings will be highlighted. Due to S198’s shortcomings, The South African Government introduced proposed amendments to the LRA (hereinafter referred to as “LRAA”).2 These proposed amendments and the effect thereof on TES are studied to determine whether it will better the current issues experienced with TES. The amendments provide difficulty in its interpretation, particularly S198A (3) (b), also referred to as the deeming provision. This paper will study the amendments and its subsections. S198A(3)(b) is problematic in its interpretation because due to the manner in which it is drafted, strong arguments can be made for either a sole employment interpretation or a dual employer interpretation. The main focus of the paper will be to study provisions of S198 (A) (3) (b) and look at who the employer is, of employees in a TES relationship, between the TES and the client. This question will also ultimately indicate what the legal position is of employees in TES relationship. This paper will also look at how courts have interpreted the deeming provision and their findings will be highlighted and criticised.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Sidloyi, Sicelo
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Temporary employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Temporary help services -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Employees -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/43478 , vital:36896
- Description: This paper focuses on the legal position of employees of a Temporary Employment Services (hereinafter referred to as “TES”), also referred to as a labour broker defined as a person or entity that provides workers to others, (their clients) to perform duties for the benefit of the client for compensation. This tripartite relationship is established by an employment contract between the employee and the TES (this forms the basis of the employment relationship) and a commercial contract between the TES and the client. This relationship is regulated by S198 of the Labour Relations Act1 (hereinafter referred to as “LRA”). This section provides protection to employees of a labour broker, where before it, such protection did not exist. This section along with its subsections will be discussed in length in this paper and this section will be criticized and its shortcomings will be highlighted. Due to S198’s shortcomings, The South African Government introduced proposed amendments to the LRA (hereinafter referred to as “LRAA”).2 These proposed amendments and the effect thereof on TES are studied to determine whether it will better the current issues experienced with TES. The amendments provide difficulty in its interpretation, particularly S198A (3) (b), also referred to as the deeming provision. This paper will study the amendments and its subsections. S198A(3)(b) is problematic in its interpretation because due to the manner in which it is drafted, strong arguments can be made for either a sole employment interpretation or a dual employer interpretation. The main focus of the paper will be to study provisions of S198 (A) (3) (b) and look at who the employer is, of employees in a TES relationship, between the TES and the client. This question will also ultimately indicate what the legal position is of employees in TES relationship. This paper will also look at how courts have interpreted the deeming provision and their findings will be highlighted and criticised.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
The interests of justice in bail proceedings
- Authors: Ntontela, Mahlubandile
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Criminal procedure -- South Africa , Bail Preventive detention
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/42683 , vital:36680
- Description: Bail in the South African context is a very contentious issue. Over the years, courts have had to develop principles for the purposes of granting or refusing bail. The interim Constitution of 1994 placed an onus on the State to adduce evidence that interests of justice justified the accused’s incarceration pending trial. After the escalation of crime in the 1990’s and the subsequent public outcry, the Legislature introduced guiding principles as to what would constitute interests of justice in bail proceedings. These principles did not differ much from what the courts had developed over the years leading to the constitutional dispensation. The inquisitorial nature of the bail proceedings was further entrenched by the amendments as they tasked the courts to determine what would be in the interests of justice in every bail enquiry. The legislative amendments further introduced what was termed the reverse onus provisions which were heavily criticised at the time of their introduction. These provisions placed an onus on the accused to adduce evidence to satisfy the courts that the interests of justice were in favour of their release in serious offences, and further adduce exceptional circumstances in respect of very serious offences. It is argued in this research that, despite the development and the codification of the interests of justice concept over the years, the duty of the courts to uphold the constitutional values should not be neglected by the courts when determining what would be in the interests of justice in bail proceedings. The standard by which the courts are to uphold the concept of interests of justice in bail proceedings should reflect the task that has been placed on the courts and not on the parties to the proceedings, when reaching a just and equitable decision in bail proceedings.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Ntontela, Mahlubandile
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Criminal procedure -- South Africa , Bail Preventive detention
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/42683 , vital:36680
- Description: Bail in the South African context is a very contentious issue. Over the years, courts have had to develop principles for the purposes of granting or refusing bail. The interim Constitution of 1994 placed an onus on the State to adduce evidence that interests of justice justified the accused’s incarceration pending trial. After the escalation of crime in the 1990’s and the subsequent public outcry, the Legislature introduced guiding principles as to what would constitute interests of justice in bail proceedings. These principles did not differ much from what the courts had developed over the years leading to the constitutional dispensation. The inquisitorial nature of the bail proceedings was further entrenched by the amendments as they tasked the courts to determine what would be in the interests of justice in every bail enquiry. The legislative amendments further introduced what was termed the reverse onus provisions which were heavily criticised at the time of their introduction. These provisions placed an onus on the accused to adduce evidence to satisfy the courts that the interests of justice were in favour of their release in serious offences, and further adduce exceptional circumstances in respect of very serious offences. It is argued in this research that, despite the development and the codification of the interests of justice concept over the years, the duty of the courts to uphold the constitutional values should not be neglected by the courts when determining what would be in the interests of justice in bail proceedings. The standard by which the courts are to uphold the concept of interests of justice in bail proceedings should reflect the task that has been placed on the courts and not on the parties to the proceedings, when reaching a just and equitable decision in bail proceedings.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
The legalisation of prostitution in South Africa
- Authors: Vaveki, Vuyani Patrick
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Prostitution|xLaw and legislation , Sex and law -- South Africa Prostitution -- South Africa Women -- Legal status, laws, etc
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/43698 , vital:37034
- Description: Prostitution or Sex work has been a crime in the country for a number of decades. In earlier years sex work was not explicitly crminalised and the government relied on various laws to regulate and deal with sex work. With the passage of time sex work was formally regulated and dealt with specifically as a criminal offence by legislation. Those legislative measures still exist to ensure that sex work remains a crime in South Africa. Courts have on a number of occasion been tasked to consider the status of sex workers in the context of the human rights provided for by the Constitution of the Republic (both the interim and the final). In the two seminal cases of S v Jordan and others and Kylie v CCMA the courts approached the status of sex workers on the basis that even sex workers are entitled to the human rights enshrined in the Constitution. The Constitutional Court in Jordan, however refused to decriminalise sex work for those purposes holding that it is for the legislature to decide the issue of decriminalisation. Various interest groups have lobbied for the decriminalisation of sex work in order to give meaning to Constitutional rights of sex workers. The criminalisation of sex work appears to be a case of the state legislating morality and interfering with private individual matters. With a bad history of state interference in private affairs of individuals this practise should be guarded against in the Constitutional dispensation. Criminal law as such should have no application in private instances that cause no harm to any other person or state interests. It appears that the continued criminalisation of sex work is increasingly appearing to be without proper justification and as such it is recommended that the country adopts the New Zealand model of decriminalisation. This will ensure that the rights of sex workers are duly respected.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Vaveki, Vuyani Patrick
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Prostitution|xLaw and legislation , Sex and law -- South Africa Prostitution -- South Africa Women -- Legal status, laws, etc
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/43698 , vital:37034
- Description: Prostitution or Sex work has been a crime in the country for a number of decades. In earlier years sex work was not explicitly crminalised and the government relied on various laws to regulate and deal with sex work. With the passage of time sex work was formally regulated and dealt with specifically as a criminal offence by legislation. Those legislative measures still exist to ensure that sex work remains a crime in South Africa. Courts have on a number of occasion been tasked to consider the status of sex workers in the context of the human rights provided for by the Constitution of the Republic (both the interim and the final). In the two seminal cases of S v Jordan and others and Kylie v CCMA the courts approached the status of sex workers on the basis that even sex workers are entitled to the human rights enshrined in the Constitution. The Constitutional Court in Jordan, however refused to decriminalise sex work for those purposes holding that it is for the legislature to decide the issue of decriminalisation. Various interest groups have lobbied for the decriminalisation of sex work in order to give meaning to Constitutional rights of sex workers. The criminalisation of sex work appears to be a case of the state legislating morality and interfering with private individual matters. With a bad history of state interference in private affairs of individuals this practise should be guarded against in the Constitutional dispensation. Criminal law as such should have no application in private instances that cause no harm to any other person or state interests. It appears that the continued criminalisation of sex work is increasingly appearing to be without proper justification and as such it is recommended that the country adopts the New Zealand model of decriminalisation. This will ensure that the rights of sex workers are duly respected.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
The effective use of legal protection to combat stigma and discrimination related to HIV and AIDS in a workplace: a case study in kwa Zulu Natal
- Authors: Ndobeni, Zoliswa Nomawesile
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: AIDS (Disease) -- Law and legislation , Medical policy -- legislation & jurisprudence Public health -- legislation & jurisprudence HIV-positive persons -- Employment -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32804 , vital:32365
- Description: Stigma and discrimination continue to be the leading cause of everyday cases of new HIV/AIDS infections in spite of the current legal and medical interventions available. The purpose of the study is to explore the effective use of legal protection in combating stigma and discrimination related to HIV/AIDS in the workplace. When it comes to fighting discrimination and stigma against people living with HIV/AIDS, it is still a challenge as these aspects prevent people from coming forward for testing and for prevention as well as treatment service. The rationale for conducting the study is to examine the relationship of the human rights as per the Constitution of South Africa and the spread and impact of HIV/AIDS on individuals in the workplace. The study is of significance to conduct as the research will further provide knowledge and awareness to both the employer and employee regarding the legal framework pertaining to HIV/AIDS and perhaps unintentional consequences of the legal framework to both the employer and employee concerning productivity and growth. Various legal frameworks were determined to address HIV pandemic in South Africa which constitutes one of the utmost challenges facing the nation as well as benchmarking international law. The structure and functioning of the workplace is a key possibility to address developmental inequities in South Africa. This includes the development of healthcare centres in the workplace. HIV testing involves a great deal of risks and consequences that may not be apparent to the patient. Hence, informed consent is required. Policies and guidelines have been put in place to protect employees. HIV clinicians now argue that HIV testing should be presented as a routine procedure, to remove social barriers and stigma. The present study recommends various programmes that may assist in minimizing stigma and discrimination of people living with HIV. This stigma prevent persons from testing for HIV status. The study also seeks to evaluate and review current policies concerning HIV/AIDS.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Ndobeni, Zoliswa Nomawesile
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: AIDS (Disease) -- Law and legislation , Medical policy -- legislation & jurisprudence Public health -- legislation & jurisprudence HIV-positive persons -- Employment -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32804 , vital:32365
- Description: Stigma and discrimination continue to be the leading cause of everyday cases of new HIV/AIDS infections in spite of the current legal and medical interventions available. The purpose of the study is to explore the effective use of legal protection in combating stigma and discrimination related to HIV/AIDS in the workplace. When it comes to fighting discrimination and stigma against people living with HIV/AIDS, it is still a challenge as these aspects prevent people from coming forward for testing and for prevention as well as treatment service. The rationale for conducting the study is to examine the relationship of the human rights as per the Constitution of South Africa and the spread and impact of HIV/AIDS on individuals in the workplace. The study is of significance to conduct as the research will further provide knowledge and awareness to both the employer and employee regarding the legal framework pertaining to HIV/AIDS and perhaps unintentional consequences of the legal framework to both the employer and employee concerning productivity and growth. Various legal frameworks were determined to address HIV pandemic in South Africa which constitutes one of the utmost challenges facing the nation as well as benchmarking international law. The structure and functioning of the workplace is a key possibility to address developmental inequities in South Africa. This includes the development of healthcare centres in the workplace. HIV testing involves a great deal of risks and consequences that may not be apparent to the patient. Hence, informed consent is required. Policies and guidelines have been put in place to protect employees. HIV clinicians now argue that HIV testing should be presented as a routine procedure, to remove social barriers and stigma. The present study recommends various programmes that may assist in minimizing stigma and discrimination of people living with HIV. This stigma prevent persons from testing for HIV status. The study also seeks to evaluate and review current policies concerning HIV/AIDS.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
The national health insurance bill: a measure to realise the right to access health care services
- Authors: Moyo, Priscilla Tariro
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Medical laws and legislation -- South Africa , Health insurance -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49016 , vital:41593
- Description: The right to access health care services is enshrined in section 27 of the Constitution. It is a right afforded to everyone. The state is required to adopt legislative and other measures for the progressive realisation of this right. To that effect, the state has passed various pieces of legislation aimed at realising the right to access health care services. The key legislative measures regulating the health system are the National Health Act, the Medical Schemes Act and the Medicines Act. Despite the various legislative measures in place, not everyone has access to health care services and there is a need for reform in the health system. To remedy the problem of inaccessibility, the government introduced the NHI Bill in 2018 which was amended in 2019. The NHI Bill purports to amend the way in which health services are financed. The purpose of this research is to determine the constitutionality of selected aspects of the NHI Bill. Section 27(2) of the Constitution requires that any measure adopted by the state in realising the right to access health care services must be reasonable. This research, therefore, assesses whether the NHI Bill is a reasonable measure that meets the requirements of section 27(2). The NHI Bill will be assessed in light of the reasonableness review used to assess state compliance with the obligation in terms of section 27. In assessing the reasonableness of the NHI Bill, reference is made to the domestic obligations of the state to realise the right to access health care services, the context in which the NHI Bill was published, the provisions of international law, and the impact the NHI Bill will have on other rights specifically the right to equality. The findings of this research are that the NHI Bill is likely to be found unconstitutional insofar as it unfairly discriminates against asylum seekers and undocumented migrants and lacks clarity with respect to important issues such as the role of medical schemes. Based on this analysis, recommendations are made to ensure that the NHI Bill is constitutionally sound.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Moyo, Priscilla Tariro
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Medical laws and legislation -- South Africa , Health insurance -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/49016 , vital:41593
- Description: The right to access health care services is enshrined in section 27 of the Constitution. It is a right afforded to everyone. The state is required to adopt legislative and other measures for the progressive realisation of this right. To that effect, the state has passed various pieces of legislation aimed at realising the right to access health care services. The key legislative measures regulating the health system are the National Health Act, the Medical Schemes Act and the Medicines Act. Despite the various legislative measures in place, not everyone has access to health care services and there is a need for reform in the health system. To remedy the problem of inaccessibility, the government introduced the NHI Bill in 2018 which was amended in 2019. The NHI Bill purports to amend the way in which health services are financed. The purpose of this research is to determine the constitutionality of selected aspects of the NHI Bill. Section 27(2) of the Constitution requires that any measure adopted by the state in realising the right to access health care services must be reasonable. This research, therefore, assesses whether the NHI Bill is a reasonable measure that meets the requirements of section 27(2). The NHI Bill will be assessed in light of the reasonableness review used to assess state compliance with the obligation in terms of section 27. In assessing the reasonableness of the NHI Bill, reference is made to the domestic obligations of the state to realise the right to access health care services, the context in which the NHI Bill was published, the provisions of international law, and the impact the NHI Bill will have on other rights specifically the right to equality. The findings of this research are that the NHI Bill is likely to be found unconstitutional insofar as it unfairly discriminates against asylum seekers and undocumented migrants and lacks clarity with respect to important issues such as the role of medical schemes. Based on this analysis, recommendations are made to ensure that the NHI Bill is constitutionally sound.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
An overview of absence without leave, sick absence and absconding in the local government sector
- Authors: Kalawe, Thozama Mavis
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Absenteeism (Labor) , Local government -- South Africa Civil service -- Labor productivity -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/30430 , vital:30943
- Description: The treatise will investigate, examine and determine how the three types of absenteeism affects the local government sector, the impact absenteeism has on service delivery. The study will examine how the employers and employees are protected by legislation when confronted with absenteeism. The three types of absenteeism, namely absence without leave, desertion and abuse of sick leave can be considered as misconduct which may result in termination of contract of employment. The treatise will unpack these three types of absenteeism in relation to the provisions applicable in South African legislation, policies and collective agreements of the local government. A comparison of the local government policies with public, and private sector will be considered. The case study of local government will be provided wherein the basic services that are provided by local government will be discussed to give a better understanding of how these three types of absenteeism impact on the delivery of such services. Recommendation will be provided regarding research findings and conclusion drawn from literature review.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Kalawe, Thozama Mavis
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Absenteeism (Labor) , Local government -- South Africa Civil service -- Labor productivity -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/30430 , vital:30943
- Description: The treatise will investigate, examine and determine how the three types of absenteeism affects the local government sector, the impact absenteeism has on service delivery. The study will examine how the employers and employees are protected by legislation when confronted with absenteeism. The three types of absenteeism, namely absence without leave, desertion and abuse of sick leave can be considered as misconduct which may result in termination of contract of employment. The treatise will unpack these three types of absenteeism in relation to the provisions applicable in South African legislation, policies and collective agreements of the local government. A comparison of the local government policies with public, and private sector will be considered. The case study of local government will be provided wherein the basic services that are provided by local government will be discussed to give a better understanding of how these three types of absenteeism impact on the delivery of such services. Recommendation will be provided regarding research findings and conclusion drawn from literature review.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Substantive fairness in dismissals based on operational requirements
- Authors: Hokwana, Tina
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor discipline -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/30331 , vital:30931
- Description: This treatise interrogates the concept of substantive fairness in dismissals based on operational requirements and commences with the background and rationale to the study. It intends to achieve by virtue of specific research questions identified in the first chapter. The second chapter focuses on a discussion defining the term operational requirements and the circumstances in which employers have sought to justify dismissals based on operational requirements together with the courts’ interpretation of the term. Following an in-depth look at the South African courts’ interpretation of operational requirements, the third chapter analyses the jurisprudential development of the law of substantive fairness and assesses how the courts have applied statutory provisions relevant to operational requirement dismissals. The third chapter is then followed by a discussion on the aspects relating to selection criteria as pronounced by South African labour-law jurisprudence and deals specifically with the concept of LIFO and the employment universe. The fourth chapter also raises the various forms of fair and objective selection criteria, as well as the concept of bumping in light of the Employment Equity Act. The final chapter concludes that the primary areas requiring reform relate to the test for substantive fairness that does not include a proportionality analysis to weigh up the competing interests of the employer and the employees. The treatise further concludes with recommendations in dealing with dismissals based on operational requirements.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Hokwana, Tina
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor discipline -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/30331 , vital:30931
- Description: This treatise interrogates the concept of substantive fairness in dismissals based on operational requirements and commences with the background and rationale to the study. It intends to achieve by virtue of specific research questions identified in the first chapter. The second chapter focuses on a discussion defining the term operational requirements and the circumstances in which employers have sought to justify dismissals based on operational requirements together with the courts’ interpretation of the term. Following an in-depth look at the South African courts’ interpretation of operational requirements, the third chapter analyses the jurisprudential development of the law of substantive fairness and assesses how the courts have applied statutory provisions relevant to operational requirement dismissals. The third chapter is then followed by a discussion on the aspects relating to selection criteria as pronounced by South African labour-law jurisprudence and deals specifically with the concept of LIFO and the employment universe. The fourth chapter also raises the various forms of fair and objective selection criteria, as well as the concept of bumping in light of the Employment Equity Act. The final chapter concludes that the primary areas requiring reform relate to the test for substantive fairness that does not include a proportionality analysis to weigh up the competing interests of the employer and the employees. The treatise further concludes with recommendations in dealing with dismissals based on operational requirements.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
The legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in the contract of employment
- Authors: Mbewana, Ntsikelelo Elliot
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor contract -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48993 , vital:41575
- Description: This study seeks to determine the legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in a contract of employment. Our law seems to have two different procedures in dealing with this issue. The first aspect is to determine whether the automatic termination clause is inserted in a contract of employment merely to circumvent the provisions of the Labour Relations Act (LRA), in particular section 5(2)(b) of the LRA. If the intention is found to be to circumvent the purpose of the said provisions of the Act, then an automatic termination clause is not allowed and any termination of the contract resulting therefrom becomes a dismissal challengeable at the CCMA, Bargaining Council or Labour Court depending on the issue at hand. In the alternative, there is no dismissal for the purposes of section 186(1) of the Act in circumstances where the end of an agreed fixed term is defined by the occurrence of a particular event. Put differently, there is no dismissal when the agreed and anticipated event materialises. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that everyone has the right to fair labour practices. This provision guarantees the right not to be unfairly dismissed and is in line with Article 4 of Convention 158 of the International Labour Organisation which provides that the employment of a worker shall not be terminated unless there is a valid reason for such termination connected with the capacity or conduct of the worker or based on operational requirements of the undertaking, establishment or service. This study aims to investigate the question of the legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in a contract of employment by analysing inter alia, the Constitution, LRA, ILO recommendations and the authorities in order to determine the extent of protection afforded to employees against employers.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Mbewana, Ntsikelelo Elliot
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor contract -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/48993 , vital:41575
- Description: This study seeks to determine the legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in a contract of employment. Our law seems to have two different procedures in dealing with this issue. The first aspect is to determine whether the automatic termination clause is inserted in a contract of employment merely to circumvent the provisions of the Labour Relations Act (LRA), in particular section 5(2)(b) of the LRA. If the intention is found to be to circumvent the purpose of the said provisions of the Act, then an automatic termination clause is not allowed and any termination of the contract resulting therefrom becomes a dismissal challengeable at the CCMA, Bargaining Council or Labour Court depending on the issue at hand. In the alternative, there is no dismissal for the purposes of section 186(1) of the Act in circumstances where the end of an agreed fixed term is defined by the occurrence of a particular event. Put differently, there is no dismissal when the agreed and anticipated event materialises. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that everyone has the right to fair labour practices. This provision guarantees the right not to be unfairly dismissed and is in line with Article 4 of Convention 158 of the International Labour Organisation which provides that the employment of a worker shall not be terminated unless there is a valid reason for such termination connected with the capacity or conduct of the worker or based on operational requirements of the undertaking, establishment or service. This study aims to investigate the question of the legality and enforceability of an automatic termination clause in a contract of employment by analysing inter alia, the Constitution, LRA, ILO recommendations and the authorities in order to determine the extent of protection afforded to employees against employers.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Substantive fairness in the context of dismissal for team misconduct
- Authors: Gcayi, Siziwe
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: South Africa -- Labour Relations Act, 1995 , Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa Labor discipline -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/22134 , vital:29852
- Description: Employees have inherent common law duties towards their employers. These duties include: obedience, care, competency and good faith.1 An employee has a duty to act in good faith towards the employer. For purposes of this treatise, focus will be on competency and good faith. Section 188(1) of the Labour Relations Act,2 provides three grounds on which dismissal can be considered to be fair. These grounds are: misconduct, capacity and an employer’s operational requirements. For purposes of this research paper, focus will be on misconduct. Capacity and employer’s operational requirements will not be discussed. For purposes of the present discussion misconduct can be divided into two broad categories namely, individual misconduct and group misconduct. Individual misconduct refers to transgression by a single employee who by his or her conduct violates the company policy or valid rule in the workplace. When the employer contemplates dismissing the employee for misconduct, it has to prove on the balance of probabilities that the employee concerned is guilty of misconduct and that the misconduct concerned justified a dismissal in the sense that it had irretrievably destroyed the requisite trust element in the employment relationship. Group misconduct refers to transgression that has been committed by group of employees. The following forms part of what can be categorised as falling within group misconduct: collective guilt, derivative misconduct, common purpose and team misconduct. Ideally the manner in which group misconduct is dealt with should be different from the way individual misconduct is handled. Individual misconduct refers to a single employee or misconduct of more than one employee who can be isolated and charged/handled as individuals, whereas group misconduct refers to a number of employees, whose conduct has offended the rules of the employer. In respect of group misconduct, the employer does not have to prove individual liability for each of the 1 Module 8 CCMA candidate commissioner notes. 2 66 of 1995. affected employees. An employer may after fulfilling certain requirements penalize them as a group.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Gcayi, Siziwe
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: South Africa -- Labour Relations Act, 1995 , Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa Labor discipline -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/22134 , vital:29852
- Description: Employees have inherent common law duties towards their employers. These duties include: obedience, care, competency and good faith.1 An employee has a duty to act in good faith towards the employer. For purposes of this treatise, focus will be on competency and good faith. Section 188(1) of the Labour Relations Act,2 provides three grounds on which dismissal can be considered to be fair. These grounds are: misconduct, capacity and an employer’s operational requirements. For purposes of this research paper, focus will be on misconduct. Capacity and employer’s operational requirements will not be discussed. For purposes of the present discussion misconduct can be divided into two broad categories namely, individual misconduct and group misconduct. Individual misconduct refers to transgression by a single employee who by his or her conduct violates the company policy or valid rule in the workplace. When the employer contemplates dismissing the employee for misconduct, it has to prove on the balance of probabilities that the employee concerned is guilty of misconduct and that the misconduct concerned justified a dismissal in the sense that it had irretrievably destroyed the requisite trust element in the employment relationship. Group misconduct refers to transgression that has been committed by group of employees. The following forms part of what can be categorised as falling within group misconduct: collective guilt, derivative misconduct, common purpose and team misconduct. Ideally the manner in which group misconduct is dealt with should be different from the way individual misconduct is handled. Individual misconduct refers to a single employee or misconduct of more than one employee who can be isolated and charged/handled as individuals, whereas group misconduct refers to a number of employees, whose conduct has offended the rules of the employer. In respect of group misconduct, the employer does not have to prove individual liability for each of the 1 Module 8 CCMA candidate commissioner notes. 2 66 of 1995. affected employees. An employer may after fulfilling certain requirements penalize them as a group.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Automatic termination clauses in employment contracts
- Authors: Ndzendze, Kutala
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Labor contract -- South Africa , Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/41808 , vital:36594
- Description: This study aims to establish Automatic Termination Clauses in Employment contracts by analyzing the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Labour Relations Act and the precedents. The automatic termination of employment contract means that the contract is terminated without giving an employee the opportunity to state his or her version as per the audi alteram partem principle. In essence, the employee is deprived of his or her right to a fair dismissal as outlined in the Labour Relations Act. The automatic termination clauses in employment contract means that the employment contract will come to an end when the employee’s services are no longer required or when the employer simply does no longer want to keep the employee at work. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that “everyone has the right to fair labour practices”.1 In terms of the Labour Relations Act (hereinafter referred to as “the LRA”),2 every employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed. An employment contract between an employee and employer arises out of a contract to perform services. This is so whether the contract is in writing or not. Dismissal is defined in the LRA3 as where the employer has terminated employment with or without a notice. The thesis is composed of five chapters, each of them dealing with different aspects of automatic termination clauses in employment contracts.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Ndzendze, Kutala
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Labor contract -- South Africa , Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Unfair labor practices -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/41808 , vital:36594
- Description: This study aims to establish Automatic Termination Clauses in Employment contracts by analyzing the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Labour Relations Act and the precedents. The automatic termination of employment contract means that the contract is terminated without giving an employee the opportunity to state his or her version as per the audi alteram partem principle. In essence, the employee is deprived of his or her right to a fair dismissal as outlined in the Labour Relations Act. The automatic termination clauses in employment contract means that the employment contract will come to an end when the employee’s services are no longer required or when the employer simply does no longer want to keep the employee at work. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa provides that “everyone has the right to fair labour practices”.1 In terms of the Labour Relations Act (hereinafter referred to as “the LRA”),2 every employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed. An employment contract between an employee and employer arises out of a contract to perform services. This is so whether the contract is in writing or not. Dismissal is defined in the LRA3 as where the employer has terminated employment with or without a notice. The thesis is composed of five chapters, each of them dealing with different aspects of automatic termination clauses in employment contracts.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Equal pay for work of equal value
- Authors: Leo, Aloshea Doreen
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Equal pay for equal work -- Law and Legislation -- South Africa , Pay equity -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/40445 , vital:36166
- Description: Since the end of the Apartheid Regime, various labour legislation has been enacted over the years to eliminate discrimination and grant everyone in South Africa the right to fair labour practices, including the prohibition of unfair payment practices in terms of item 2(1)(a) of Schedule 7 of the Labour Relations Act.1 The above item was repealed and replaced with an express provision strictly prohibiting unfair discrimination in any employment practice or policy.2 However, even though this express provision strictly prohibited unfair discrimination in employment, the International Labour Organisation criticised South Africa for the failure to include an express provision dealing specifically with equal remuneration in terms of the Employment Equity Act.3 Because of this criticism, sections 6(4) and (5)4 were introduced. Section 6(4) amendments were obviously not been successful as intended, as numerous employees still are facing unfair discrimination based on the wages. Looking at Case law in the United Kingdom, there are clearly principles and successes that South Africa can learn from and incorporate in South African labour law. Some successes include the proactivity of employers who identify groups of employees, which are performing work that is of equal value, comparing their salaries, and by investigating and removing pay gap causes. Another success is the use of reports of independent experts who can assess the value of different occupations. If South Africa does this, it will alleviate the pressure placed upon courts that do not have the necessary expertise to decide on the value.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Leo, Aloshea Doreen
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Equal pay for equal work -- Law and Legislation -- South Africa , Pay equity -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/40445 , vital:36166
- Description: Since the end of the Apartheid Regime, various labour legislation has been enacted over the years to eliminate discrimination and grant everyone in South Africa the right to fair labour practices, including the prohibition of unfair payment practices in terms of item 2(1)(a) of Schedule 7 of the Labour Relations Act.1 The above item was repealed and replaced with an express provision strictly prohibiting unfair discrimination in any employment practice or policy.2 However, even though this express provision strictly prohibited unfair discrimination in employment, the International Labour Organisation criticised South Africa for the failure to include an express provision dealing specifically with equal remuneration in terms of the Employment Equity Act.3 Because of this criticism, sections 6(4) and (5)4 were introduced. Section 6(4) amendments were obviously not been successful as intended, as numerous employees still are facing unfair discrimination based on the wages. Looking at Case law in the United Kingdom, there are clearly principles and successes that South Africa can learn from and incorporate in South African labour law. Some successes include the proactivity of employers who identify groups of employees, which are performing work that is of equal value, comparing their salaries, and by investigating and removing pay gap causes. Another success is the use of reports of independent experts who can assess the value of different occupations. If South Africa does this, it will alleviate the pressure placed upon courts that do not have the necessary expertise to decide on the value.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019